JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Builders demand simpler planning

Date

Stephanie Anderson

MBA ACT Deputy Jerry Howard with apprentice Luke Gilbert.

MBA ACT Deputy Jerry Howard with apprentice Luke Gilbert. Photo: Colleen Petch

Canberra's building industry is facing a dramatic downturn and widespread job losses unless the ACT government takes action to cut red tape, the Master Builders' Association has warned.

MBA ACT deputy executive director Jerry Howard said the local industry was being strangled by regulation, adding significant costs to the bottom line for builders and renovators.

Residential construction starts in the capital fell by 18.5 per cent in the December quarter, seasonally adjusted, a drop which the MBA in part blames on regulatory costs and delays caused by excessive red tape.

''Maybe we're getting to the point in the construction industry where people cannot afford to build,'' Mr Howard said.

''It's going to affect the government's bottom line because if people can't afford to build in Canberra and if we don't create an environment that supports investment in building, they'll just go across the border.''

MBA ACT is calling for urgent action in the wake of last week's federal budget, which has put increased pressure on the industry by cutting public service jobs within the capital.

''The bottom line is that unless a definitive strategy is put in place, we will face considerable pressure on an industry which employs around 15,000 in the ACT and contributes heavily in terms of job creation and apprenticeships,'' Mr Howard said.

''We can't control what the feds do, but we can control what we do within our own building and planning system.''

Mr Howard said an important step in the reforms would be addressing building and planning anomalies, including difficulties surrounding draft variations.

He said the recent case involving the development of two heritage-listed 1920s cottages in Yarralumla was an example of a project for which the development application had expired and would have to be reassessed.

He said it could be demolished if it did not meet current planning legislation introduced after the initial development application, such as DV 306. ''I find it quite bizarre that a draft variation has de facto force of law before any consultation has occurred or, for that matter, consideration by the Legislative Assembly,'' he said.

However, a spokesman for the environment and sustainable development minister said the measure was necessary.

''If interim effect is not made, developers have the opportunity to rush in with development applications before the draft variation is considered by the minister, getting around the intent of the change,'' he said. The spokesman said the government, along with industry bodies such as the MBA, had already invested substantial time, effort and funding into creating better regulation.

''The stated goal of the project is to create a clear and concise regulatory framework that assists the economic development of the city whilst at the same time improving the quality of the built form within the city,'' he said.

The spokesman said for most building projects valued at less than $20 million, regulatory costs have decreased in the past year.

3 comments so far

  • Maybe if Canberra builders weren't so dodgy they would still have customers. Perhaps the HIA and MBA should clean up their own backyard first...

    Commenter
    dodgy
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    May 16, 2012, 9:15AM
    • Great. Might be able to finally get a tradies who will do a quality job for a reasonable price and not the other way around. No one associated with housing is going to get much sympathy.

      Commenter
      Waynes Black Swan
      Date and time
      May 16, 2012, 10:55AM
      • I bought a block from the lda at auction and after planning, submitted the DA 4 months later. The proposed DA is within the guidelines of the territory plan. It has been over 11 Months since submission of the DA which is still not approved or unapproved??? If the territory releases land for the intended uses, why are they taking so long to approve DA's? Meanwhile under the crown lease my timelines to start and complete construction are running out at theyre expense- one of which i get fined if i do not start and complete in the specified time.... How much red tape do we need??

        Commenter
        Greener pastures
        Location
        North canberra
        Date and time
        May 19, 2012, 1:55AM

        Make a comment

        You are logged in as [Logout]

        All information entered below may be published.

        Error: Please enter your screen name.

        Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Please enter your comment.

        Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

        Post to

        You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

        Thank you

        Your comment has been submitted for approval.

        Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

        Featured advertisers

        Special offers

        Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo