JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Heavy-handed officials ruin potential of Kingston Green Square restoration

Kingston Traders and TAMS are battling over grass in Green Square at the Kingston Shops.

Kingston Traders and TAMS are battling over grass in Green Square at the Kingston Shops. Photo: Graham Tidy

The ACT government was squandering a golden opportunity to foster community ownership of green space by its heavy-handed approach to restoring grass in Kingston's Green Square, said University of Canberra academic Andrew MacKenzie.

Dr MacKenzie, assistant professor of landscape architecture, said Territory and Municipal Services was engaged in a "clumsy and unimaginative attempt to shift the cost, risk and red tape on to the local vendors" by giving them a bill for an estimated $70,000 to replant and water grass.

After years of protracted squabbling over Green Square, which was planted with drought-resistant natives in 2010, traders have offered to cover the bill for relaying the grass.

But this week they went public with their disgust over a TAMS memorandum of understanding that shifted $20 million in public liability insurance and two $20,000 ten-year bonds to traders.

Kingston Traders spokesman and building owner Pawl Cubbin, who had offered to pay up to $20,000 for the grass, described it as "bureaucracy gone mad".

Dr MacKenzie said TAMS should be "jumping for joy" at the offer and be prepared to work with traders and hand responsibility for the grass over to them.

"If Kingston Green can be willingly maintained by the community without having to privatise the space through development then a new model for caring for managing the Canberra landscape could be mobilised across many of the city's parks and commons," Dr MacKenzie said.

TAMS officials contacted Mr Cubbin on Tuesday to organise a meeting on Thursday to resolve the matter urgently.

Dr MacKenzie said the TAMS memorandum would not work because "it lacks imagination and fails to consider how to devolve the decisions about open space management to those that have the greatest to gain from investing in and maintaining Kingston Green''.

''By giving local vendors greater authority along with responsibility for maintaining some open spaces, TAMS might be able to support a new way of keeping Canberra clean and green in an increasingly constrained financial environment as revenues decline.''

Meanwhile, former and current traders said the government spent considerable time consulting with them in the early 1990s to come up with a plan to regenerate Green Square with drought-resistant grass and sub-soil irrigation, but reneged at the last minute and the work was never undertaken.

John Cusack, of the Cusack family store, which had been operating in Kingston since 1938, said it was unacceptable that tenants be

expected to cover the cost of new grass when it was the government's responsibility.

"They should have done the job properly in the first place, after spending months and months talking to us in endless meetings.

''I don't see why traders should be hit with the whole thing now. It is not fair at all."

Former Kingston tenant Peter Jansen also took part in the consultation at the time and said it was outrageous to expect local businesses to stump up money for government neglect.

"It really got my goat to read that the traders are now expected to pay for all of this,'' he said. ''If the government had done their job properly in the first place this wouldn't be happening.

''I think the government should go right back to their original plan and do what they said they would do - and pay for it. In the meantime, the rates and land taxes in Kingston have gone through the roof, and for what?"

Mr Cusack said impending commercial competition from the Kingston foreshore development meant a solution to Kingston's Green Square woes was required urgently, lest businesses suffer further.

"Grass would definitely enhance the area, and they need to do it quickly because there is going to be a lot more competition in the future."

Liberal MLA Steve Doszpot said the issue showed the government was ''seriously out of touch'' with the business community.

''I'm hoping this can be resolved without delay so these traders who have the community at heart can get on with running their businesses,'' he said.

6 comments so far

  • As a Kingston resident of over 10 years, the only sensible conclusion one can come to is that this government is completely incompetent. It's simply unacceptable that public money can be wasted on the weeds that have been planted when no-one wanted them in the first place. Money flushed down the toilet, again. The government must restore Green Square to its former glory with grass immediately.

    Commenter
    Scott
    Date and time
    January 08, 2014, 9:05AM
    • Remember when we we're fighting for gay marriage - now we're fighting over grass... I miss big cities.

      Commenter
      Tom
      Date and time
      January 08, 2014, 11:24AM
  • Typical ACT government. Spend a million dollars on studying the problem. (It's grass for goodness sake. How complicated can it be?). Then run out of money and slug anyone and everyone with a big bill and rates increases. Then spend another million dollars arguing about it. Then start the consultation process all over again. Rinse repeat.

    Commenter
    John
    Date and time
    January 08, 2014, 10:49AM
    • To me, it looks as though someone is thoroughly wedded to the landscape design as it stands and is putting up as many road blocks as possible to thwart its removal. To top it off, if the traders do bite the bullet, there is a caveat that the Government can bulldoze the lot and return it to the drought resistant setting it is now whenever it pleases. Perhaps some ministerial and public servant names should be attributed to these conditions and questions asked about what role they had in establishing the current setting.

      Commenter
      YS
      Date and time
      January 08, 2014, 11:14AM
      • Im still shocked you can get a Doctorate in Landscape Architecture and still be taken seriously....he's a gardener right or is he a garden designer?

        Commenter
        Frank
        Date and time
        January 08, 2014, 11:25AM
        • just another sign of a govt that thinks its bigger than the people it serves. Can you believe that the people who dream up this crap are being paid to do so!.

          But alas, Canberra folk dont like libs it seems.

          Its a joke, especially when you had one bloke ready to stump up the money!.

          Commenter
          I like grass
          Date and time
          January 08, 2014, 12:40PM

          Make a comment

          You are logged in as [Logout]

          All information entered below may be published.

          Error: Please enter your screen name.

          Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

          Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

          Error: Please enter your comment.

          Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

          Post to

          You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

          Thank you

          Your comment has been submitted for approval.

          Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

          Related Coverage

          Featured advertisers

          Special offers

          Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo