JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

The new values for public servants

The Minister for the Public Service Mark Dreyfus speaks to the media.

The Minister for the Public Service Mark Dreyfus speaks to the media. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

The nation's public servants were told bluntly on Tuesday that behaving ethically was critical to maintaining confidence in the public sector.

One of the dilemmas they face is how to react when offered lunches, dinners and footy tickets from a contractor.

The Minister for the Public Service Mark Dreyfus said there was no one answer to that, but public servants could apply a new set of public service values when deciding what to do.

Speaking to the new class of about 170 graduates, he said the new set of values would help them make decisions about issues such as how far can they go in helping a mate get a job in the public service.

"Behaving ethically is critical in the public sector," he told the audience.

"A democracy cannot function without public trust in government nor without a system of public administration in which the community can have confidence.

"From the perspective of government and the community, the public service is only as trustworthy as each of its employees.

"In adhering to these values in its work, the APS will ensure that Australians can trust that our government is conducted to the highest ethical and performance standards.

"Australia will have a public service where its staff can be proud of their work and have confidence that they have delivered professional and impartial services to the very best of their ability."

The new values launched by Mr Dreyfus come into effect on July 1, together with changes to strengthen the role of the Public Service Commissioner.

The former set of values was long, difficult to remember and not sufficiently focussed on contemporary requirements, Mr Dreyfus said.

“The current 15 Australian Public Service values will be replaced with a shorter set of values that are intended to be more meaningful, memorable and effective in driving changes," he said.

The values were fundamental to the integrity of the public service, he said.

'They lie at the heart of the democratic process and the confidence the public has in the way public servants deliver services and exercise authority when meeting government objectives," he said.

"Good public administration is a protection not only against inefficiency and poor performance, but also against fraud, corruption, inequity, inability to conduct business confidently and infringement of human rights."

Along with the new values, recent amendments require decisions to appoint or sack departmental secretaries to be made by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, rather than by a decision of the Prime Minister, and set five years as the minimum appointment period, unless the secretary requests otherwise.

"A five-year term will help to avoid the perception that appointments can be tied to the electoral cycle," Mr Dreyfus said.

The new Australian Public Service values:

  • Impartial: The APS is apolitical and provides the government with advice that is frank, honest, timely and based on the best available evidence.
  • Committed to service: The APS is professional, objective, innovative and efficient, and works collaboratively to achieve the best results for the Australian community and the government.
  • Accountable: The APS is open and accountable to the Australian community under the law and within the framework of ministerial responsibility.
  • Respectful: The APS respects all people, including their rights and their heritage.
  • Ethical: The APS demonstrates leadership, is trustworthy, and acts with integrity, in all that it does

23 comments

  • >>One of the dilemmas they [public servants] face is how to react when offered lunches, dinners and footy tickets from a contractor.

    How is that a dilemma, please? How else should you react when offered a bribe?

    Commenter
    Ben C of Canberra
    Date and time
    June 18, 2013, 12:42PM
    • Same way Private sector would? Take it with both hands and run?

      Commenter
      o.O
      Date and time
      June 18, 2013, 1:30PM
    • Interesting that these are new Australian Public Service values.

      What were the old ones?

      Commenter
      Nimby
      Date and time
      June 18, 2013, 3:02PM
    • @o.O hahaha,

      Commenter
      markymark
      Location
      sydney
      Date and time
      June 18, 2013, 4:04PM
  • We won't be looking to our lords and masters to set the standards; do as we say not as we do.

    Commenter
    Wing Nut
    Date and time
    June 18, 2013, 12:51PM
    • Correct, Ms/Mr Nut, or can we just call you Wing?

      Ethics, like treacle trickle down from the top.

      SES = Sub-Ethical Standards

      Commenter
      Nimby
      Date and time
      June 18, 2013, 2:07PM
  • How about the politicians focus on leading by example and ensure THEY act ethically. Why is there one set of rules for the Public Service but the pollies from the PM down seem to think they are beyond acting ethically and with dignity. Their behaviour at times both in and out of Parliamant is something they should be so ashamed of.

    Commenter
    tara
    Date and time
    June 18, 2013, 1:00PM
    • So true. They are the leaders of the public service so to speak. But never work cooperatively or respectfully with other politicians unless they are of the same political alliance. Government should be about good policy, not competition and point scoring.

      Commenter
      Snaddle
      Date and time
      June 18, 2013, 10:08PM
  • It doesn't matter what commandments are handed down from above, it matters how they are implemented. For example, when management are given feedback from within their organisation that points to a bad culture existing within it, 99 times out of 100 they ignore it because it is too hard to fix. Now, if they are prepared to slay an ordinary public servant for a relatively minor offence and are simultaneously ignoring the big picture stuff themselves, in my book they run foul of the Public Service values to a much greater extent than the ordinary public servant. So are we going to see something substantive on this front, or are management just going to publicly slay a few individuals on the altar of expediency to create the illusion they are doing something? If so, then Dreyfus's comments are no more than a public relations exercise.

    The way the system is going, it will continue to trundle on indiscriminately bowling over the good and bad. The politicians and senior PS management need to do more than working up a new set of written values on paper. Whatever happened to working through issues on their merits? These days everyone's either too lazy or afraid to.

    Commenter
    RobP
    Date and time
    June 18, 2013, 1:25PM
    • Like their leaders?

      Can anyone say when they last heard an ethical rationalisation by a politician for a decision they made? When do they ever justify their decisions or behaviour under a ethical theory and present arguments to back up their assertions!

      Commenter
      TheJoker1214324
      Date and time
      June 18, 2013, 2:08PM

      More comments

      Comments are now closed
      Featured advertisers

      Special offers

      Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo