JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

AFL moves to win back fans

'The fixture next year will be drawn up squarely through the lens of attendances': Gillon McLachlan.

'The fixture next year will be drawn up squarely through the lens of attendances': Gillon McLachlan. Photo: Getty Images

The AFL has established a blueprint to win back Victorian fans, admitting that the MCG and Etihad Stadium no longer set the benchmark as match-day venues and that the game's heartland has suffered due to a highly experimental 2014 fixture and a messy ticketing system.

Less than two months into his term as the game's new boss, Gillon McLachlan has conceded the AFL has made it too difficult for fans to get to games, has not worked in true partnership with the MCG and Etihad Stadium and the recently relaunched stadiums in Adelaide and the Gold Coast were leading the way in providing for football supporters. McLachlan has called on all 10 Victorian clubs and Melbourne's two AFL venues to help develop a united push to lift Melbourne attendances.

Victorian crowds have fallen by almost 4000 a game on last season to a game average of 37,250, while attendances have risen marginally across Australia.

"The fixture next year will be drawn up squarely through the lens of attendances," McLachlan said.


Proposals for 2015 and beyond include:

■An annual 24-hour hotline offering fans the chance to buy tickets at bargain prices to every home and away game.

■The abolition of the two-bye season, all Sunday night games and most Sunday MCG twilight fixtures and a return to traditional time slots that could see a Good Friday game taken off the agenda until 2016.

■A revamping of the MCG scoreboard to reflect the passion of the home teams, in the belief that venue's internal broadcast has become pedestrian and outdated.

■The establishment of a central ticketing body based on operations such as Webjet.

■A push for Melbourne clubs to widen their focus beyond simply attracting big membership numbers, instead transforming those members into match-day fans.

■A more flexible approach to use of the retractable roof at Etihad Stadium, including opening it at short notice in good conditions.

■An already established working party of Melbourne clubs and stadiums to help create a match-day experience at MCG and Etihad games comparable with the recently rebuilt Adelaide Oval and the Gold Coast's Metricon.

■The promotion and advertising of games at the MCG and Etihad in a manner similar to interstate fixtures.

McLachlan stressed the campaign to increase Melbourne attendances was not a knee-jerk response to the falling crowds, insisting the fan-friendly strategy had been part of a longer-term agenda.

Some 15 months ago – while still Andrew Demetriou's deputy – McLachlan is understood to have delivered a paper to the commission detailing a strategy to improve the AFL experience for customers.

''We have an amazing game, we have amazing stadiums and we have amazing supporters,'' said McLachlan.

''How can we take down the barriers which seem to be complicating the match experience to improve that and bring all of the above together in a more simple way?''We're working very closely with the venues and the clubs to look at every aspect of the match day more broadly. That includes getting our fixture right and taking the barriers away from getting to the games, which involves a new approach to ticketing.''

However, several Melbourne clubs remained sceptical about the roles they could play in lifting attendances, claiming they were constrained by the MCG's control over the ground and its scoreboard. Two clubs told Fairfax Media they had already stretched their resources in the promotion and marketing of home games.

The AFL has identified four key factors for the fall in Victorian attendances this season. In short, it blames its own fixture, complex ticketing, poor performances by Richmond, Carlton and St Kilda and fan fatigue over the Essendon drug scandal and its messy fallout.

The 24-hour sale proposal has been pencilled in for late March, on the eve of next season, and would sell tickets online to every game – potentially even providing a small package for Anzac Day –  at a cost of $15 for adults and $2 for children. McLachlan has also worked to improve the league's prickly relationship with Etihad Stadium boss Paul Sergeant. The pair met for two hours earlier this month.

There has also has been significant tension between the AFL Commission and the MCG over the stadium's control of that venue and its scoreboard.

''The fact is we've had relationships not partnerships with our two Melbourne stadiums,'' said McLachlan. ''We need to evolve that.''

Some Melbourne clubs believe the Adelaide Oval has shown up the MCG and Etihad this season, with the Crows' and Port Adelaide's home games complemented by light and laser shows radiating the home team's colours across the ground, live music and, in Port's case, a fan march to each home game accompanied by themed music. Switches in momentum during games and home team goals are reflected on the highly parochial scoreboards.

Having taken responsibility for an experimental fixture that has hurt a number of big clubs – notably Collingwood and Carlton – the league also accepts it erred in its approach to ticketing this season, pointing to an already complex and multi-layered system further hampered by the fact Etihad and the MCG sell their tickets through rival agencies.

''The fixture next year will be drawn up squarely through the lens of attendances,'' said McLachlan, who has admitted the AFL tested new time slots for its broadcast partners. But he rejected the suggestion the AFL had prioritised expansion into the Sydney and southern Queensland markets at the expense of its heartland.

McLachlan also scoffed at claims the most recent broadcast agreement and its focus on full live coverage of all games had hurt attendances, pointing to last Saturday's record Hawthorn-Sydney crowd of more than 72,000 that attracted a massive TV audience.

Next season's fixture will include the return to just one bye, probably staged over three consecutive weeks each boasting six games, and more consistent time slots that will take Sunday twilight games away from the MCG and stage them more often in Perth, Adelaide and at Etihad Stadium.

The Magpies' Melbourne crowds have fallen well below their high standards – down almost 6000 fans a game to an average 55,445. Last Sunday's twilight clash against Adelaide saw the Magpies attract about 42,000 after the AFL had conservatively predicted a 48,000 attendance.

195 comments so far

  • Also get rid of free agency.
    It stabs at the very heart of why we follow and are loyal to a club. The more Franklin like episodes the less passion people will have for their teams and membership money will fall away.

    Captain Grumpy
    Date and time
    July 31, 2014, 7:31AM
    • I would have thought if you are going to experiment with something, try it on the bigger clubs who can handle a bit of pain. Ok it didn't work so change it! The more worrying thing is the progressive decline in numbers for carlton and Collingwood.....crowd numbers are always performance based......just look at Melbourne and the dogs this want hope!

      @ captian grumpy....all you progressive socialists out there have no concept of what free agency is all about....if your good at what you do an you have an opportunity to earn more money somewhere else, shouldn't it be up to the individual to decide how loyal he is?? All these coaches talk about equalisation of the competition but all I'm seeing is that the ones complaining are the ones that have had it pretty good for a while now. Chris Scott is complaining that they are being pillaged......he should ask himself why these people are leaving in the first place!!!!!!

      Why should clubs who have handled their finances better be punished by not being able to lure good players.....if you want the better players the clubs have to do better on and OFF the field.....simple as that.

      I can guarantee nothing would change if every club had access to the same amount of dollars!! Absolutely nothing!!! Socialists of the world unite!! Give me a spell.

      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 8:18AM
    • and while you're at it get rid of Essendon and replace them with Tassie. this saga has dragged on too long. they have cheated with impunity and have been whipped over the bum with a wet featherduster. The AFL tried to orchestrate an outcome suitable to all - but most of all their image - and all it has done is condone cheating, pissed off the public and made some lawyers very very very wealthy

      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 8:41AM
    • The Franklin "episode" certainly didn't affect the passion of the Hawks fans. They not only have a record membership following it (as do the Swans), the games between the two clubs this year broke attendance records both in Sydney and in Melbourne. The game was one of the highest rating games this yer on TV. So it appears to be having the exact opposite effect to your prediction.

      the sky
      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 9:13AM
    • Jeez you're all a bunch of sooks in Melbourne - Buddy gave nine years to the hawks and the same whining was heard when Ablett went to the Suns. One eyed melbourne tossers want the players treated like slaves. Sydney memberships have gone up plenty since the budster signed on so free agency isn't stabbing at our heart. And here's a tip - we'll keep taking em as long as they're happy to come up - which they all are to escape you sooks down there !!

      $ydney Wallets
      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 9:30AM
    • Free agency is the antithesis of supporter loyalty, but it's probably here to stay. However free agency is utter corruption unless all clubs are allowed to spend the same amount.

      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 11:38AM
    • Dear $ydney Wallets - your club is supported (sponsored)by the AFL. Don't you think it strange that Sydney was the only club who could meet Franklins demands?

      The Real Johno
      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 11:39AM
    • @ Gaz,

      don't be a fool. Essendon is a club with a proud history which has sadly been tainted by the actions of certain officials. While the administration may need changing, the club itself will continue on, whether you like it or not.

      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 12:03PM
    • @ $ydney Wallets,

      the Ablett situation was a bit different.

      Firstly, Ablett was part of the 2007 Grand Final playing group that made an oath to stick together, even if it meant taking a significant pay cut.

      Secondly, had Ablett been up front and honest with his teammates and club, that he was considering going to Gold Coast for new opportunities that he wouldn't get at Geelong (such as captaining the team), then most would have wished him well. It was that he chose to maintain a veil of secrecy which impacted on the club for the whole of 2010, and then made as though he'd only decided last minute to defect.

      All that aside, Geelong supporters still have a soft spot for Ablett, and only wish him the best.

      Date and time
      July 31, 2014, 12:08PM
  • As a club member, the main reason I didn't go to most of the away games is the cost, sitting up where I need binoculars to see the game and paying $55 is absurd and plain greedy.

    Date and time
    July 31, 2014, 7:36AM

    More comments

    Make a comment

    You are logged in as [Logout]

    All information entered below may be published.

    Error: Please enter your screen name.

    Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Please enter your comment.

    Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

    Post to

    You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

    Thank you

    Your comment has been submitted for approval.

    Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

    Related Coverage

    Follow Us on Facebook

    Featured advertisers