JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

At home or away, the umpire pays no favours

Free to celebrate: Joy for Geelong after a thrilling win against Fremantle at the weekend.

Free to celebrate: Joy for Geelong after a thrilling win against Fremantle at the weekend. Photo: Getty Images

Loud, boisterous, braying parochial home crowds in most cases do not influence an umpire’s decisions, according to umpires director Wayne Campbell.

While the assumption of fans is that umpires feel pressured by home crowds, Campbell said the numbers this year indicate the home side has had more missed free kicks than away teams.

At the weekend, Fremantle lost to Geelong at Simonds Stadium by only two points but they lost the free kick count by an astonishing number. Geelong received 25 free kicks to Fremantle’s 10 to half-time. According to Champion Data it was the first time since 2011 that a side had been paid 25 free kicks in a half. The Cats received only six free kicks in the second half.

‘‘It was a bit of an outlier game really,’’ Campbell said. ‘‘And I think if you go back to the Bulldogs-Geelong game at Simonds Stadium, the raw figures were quite different for the home team [the Bulldogs received 12 more frees than Geelong].

‘‘Our whole point is that the raw for-and-against numbers do not matter, what really matters is the correct decision, the missed decisions and the unwarranted free kicks,’’ he said.

‘‘We have looked at games this year that you would call parochial-crowd games. So not every game a round, but about four games per round. 

‘‘Of the parochial games we have looked at – in 35 games the free kicks were in favour of the home team, 28 were the away team and in eight the numbers were equal. Of those games, there were 222 frees missed for the home team and 202 missed for the away team.

‘‘Adelaide-Hawthorn in round 17 for instance, the free kicks were 14-13 Adelaide’s way, but there were eight frees missed for Adelaide and one missed for Hawthorn. So the figures would suggest the home team should have received more frees. 

‘‘Now, as for the psychology of that, I don’t know. Is it the psychology of the umpire in front of a home crowd, or the players in front of a home crowd?’’

In Perth on Sunday, West Coast received 12 frees to Collingwood’s three at quarter-time in a game the Eagles won by 10 goals. The 17 free-kick differential between teams in the West Coast-Collingwood and Geelong-Fremantle games were the biggest of the season.

According to Champion Data’s raw for-and-against free kick numbers, West Coast at home fares the best of any club, with the Eagles having the better of the free kick count in nine of 11 games there, and with a differential overall of more than 50 free kicks compared with their opponents. Adelaide is next best, having ‘‘won’’ the free kick count in seven of 10 home games with a free kick differential in the Crows favour of 40.

The Cats at home are next best having won the free kick count in four of their six home games and overall they have been 25 frees up on their opponents.

In contrast, Fremantle has only won the free kick count in four of their 10 home games and overall are down seven free kicks on opponents. Gold Coast has had more frees than its opponent in only two of its nine home games and is overall down 14 frees on  opponents. Campbell said free-kick numbers were up to an average of 38 a game over the past four weeks.

6 comments so far

  • I read an article last week where umpires had favourite players who got more frees. This kind of disputes your argument then.

    Date and time
    August 13, 2014, 12:20PM
    • Raw numbers disguise many things.

      Its frees that result in goals - or shots at goals that really count.
      And non frees that allow a goal to be kicked.

      A push int he back when a guy was about to run in and kick a goal anyway. Big deal.

      Go back to the Freo v Geelong game earlier in year. First qtr - Freo got 3 goals from frees.
      They got about 5 or 6 from the match. They kicked another goal when a Geelong player was attacked front on, and no free, while attempting to mark.

      They are the one that count. Not 15 across half back.

      Date and time
      August 13, 2014, 12:44PM
      • Always thought that Adelaide were robbed in the match against Hawthorn. Thanks for confirming this.

        Date and time
        August 13, 2014, 3:18PM
        • After playing and watching the game for over seventy years, I have an understanding of the difficulties facing umpires particularly when the tackling is so fierce and the speed at which the game is played is so hectic. However, irrespective of who is the home team, umpires are still having trouble with several rules as the interpretation appears to vary from decision to decision. In the WBU and St Kilda game last Sunday, the St Kilda players on the ground dragged the ball in on no less than four occasions, clearly holding the ball but the umpire ruled 'a bounce'. WBU players did ithe same thing on at least three occasions and were penalised for holding the ball. The other rules that brings a number of different interpretations are the punching to the back of the neck and head and holding the player off the ball. Probably, I see three or four games each week-end and I am still confused by the different interpretaions used throughout the same game.

          Date and time
          August 13, 2014, 4:11PM
          • that umpiring in the wce v coll game was an absolute disgrace. At one stage wce kicked a goal off 3 rapid fire dubious free kicks from a centre bounce. wce's stats for free kicks at home tells the real story....

            silent majority
            Date and time
            August 13, 2014, 5:32PM
            • the theory only works if u r a non victorian team playing a victorian team - then the umpires go out of their way to pull free kicks out of their proverbial - usually for soemthing you havent seen penalised for years

              Date and time
              August 13, 2014, 5:38PM

              Make a comment

              You are logged in as [Logout]

              All information entered below may be published.

              Error: Please enter your screen name.

              Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

              Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

              Error: Please enter your comment.

              Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

              Post to

              You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

              Thank you

              Your comment has been submitted for approval.

              Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

              Follow Us on Facebook

              Featured advertisers