JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Bombers players were treated like guinea pigs

Date

Richard Baker, Nick McKenzie and Jake Niall

EXCLUSIVE

Admission: Essendon captain Jobe Watson says he has taken AOD9604.

Admission: Essendon captain Jobe Watson says he has taken AOD9604. Photo: Getty Images

Essendon captain Jobe Watson and several teammates were used as human guinea pigs by the club, receiving injections or infusions of banned drug AOD9604 in volumes and at a frequency far exceeding its clinical trials.

Fairfax Media can reveal that the Australian Sports Anti-doping Authority is investigating whether the physical performance of Essendon players given certain supplements, including AOD9604, was measured against teammates who had not received the drugs and whether results were passed to external parties.

Essendon's investigator, Ziggy Switkowski, termed it a ''pharmacologically experimental environment''. An unknown number of players is understood to have been regularly injected with AOD9604 - which is not approved for human use - for several months last year.

Scientific documents obtained by Fairfax Media show the Melbourne company which holds worldwide patents for AOD9604, Metabolic Pharmaceuticals, conducted four Australian human clinical trials to determine its safety and effect as an anti-obesity medication.

In one of the trials, the drug was delivered intravenously and participants were given AOD9604 just three times and the average dose ranged between 9.7 milligrams to 58.2 milligrams. The trials found the drug to be safe at that frequency and volume but ineffective as a fat-buster. There were 118 adverse events, three of them severe.

Watson's admission last week that he was injected with AOD9604, which is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency because it is not approved for human use, has fuelled debate about possible player sanctions and Brownlow medal revocation. However, the issue causing greater concern is that of player welfare.

Documents show that some AOD9604 trial participants reported a euphoric effect. An international patent was filed in 2003 to develop the drug as an antidepressant. The reported euphoric effect raises questions about whether the repeated injecting of AOD9604 in Essendon players posed the risk of addiction.

Essendon's former sports science chief Stephen Dank has stressed he never gave anything harmful or illegal to the players. But no one from Essendon has explained yet why fit young men would need a failed anti-obesity drug or extracts of pigs brains - the drug cerebrolysin - used to treat dementia.

Contacted by Fairfax Media on Friday, Dank denied measuring the effects of various drugs in Essendon players and said he was unaware of any information being passed to external parties.

Metabolic chief executive David Kenley has previously said his company had no financial link to Dank and in April said he had been surprised when the sports scientist told him last year he was using AOD9604 at Essendon to aid player recovery. ''I wasn't sure it was the right environment,'' Kenley told Fairfax Media in April. ''At that stage we had no firm animal data to indicate that it could work in a human in ways that he wanted.''

Fairfax Media has not seen any evidence to suggest a financial link between Dank or Metabolic. Metabolic said yesterday it had given Dank no incentive to use AOD9604 at Essendon. Nor has evidence been produced to suggest information on the performance of Essendon players given certain supplements was passed to external parties.

Documents lodged with the Australian Stock Exchange last year by Metabolic's listed parent company, Calzada, show the company had lodged patent applications covering AOD9604's use in cartilage and muscle repair at the same time as the drug was being used at Essendon.

The patent applications came after Metabolic received results of Canadian testing in animal cells that showed AOD9604 ''has a positive (anabolic) effect on cartilage tissue formation'', the company told the ASX.

Internal Metabolic emails from 2011 obtained by Fairfax Media show the company was trying to gather all data related to AOD9604's effect on muscle cells. Its executives were excited by the drug's popularity in the body-building scene and the big sums being earned by Chinese black market manufacturers.

Dank last year helped to arrange for Essendon chairman David Evans, who runs an investment broking firm, and coach James Hird, a trained stockbroker, to receive a stockbroker briefing on the company's prospects. Essendon Football Club said it had no knowledge of any such trial. ''The club has no knowledge of any 'clinical trial' and if this is found to be true, it is deeply distressing and disturbing, and goes to the heart of what may have been perpetrated at our club.

''We are in the hands of ASADA and we continue to support our players during this process and we have brought in independent medical and pharmacological advice which has provided comfort to the club about the safety of our players.''

11 comments so far

  • Another fine piece of guesswork that does nothing but perpetuate the hysteria going on at the moment. Alot of words that still are not evidence of anything. Alot of speculation based solely on guesswork. Come back to us when you have the real story.

    Commenter
    Sherlock Holmes
    Date and time
    June 30, 2013, 2:36AM
    • If Jobe Watson was half the man everybody claims he is, he'd give back the Brownlow that he has unfairly won. It's pretty simple really. The man is showing no integrity or leadership in this matter what so ever.

      Commenter
      Mike
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      June 30, 2013, 6:26AM
      • Guinea pigs generally don't sign consent forms...

        Commenter
        Skeptical
        Location
        Sydney
        Date and time
        June 30, 2013, 6:35AM
        • This is written like an exclusive exposé but the only new information here relates to the clinical trials of AOD-9604, not to its use by Essendon. In other words it's a beat-up. The wonder is that took three to write it. Fair dinkum!

          Commenter
          Philip Maguire
          Date and time
          June 30, 2013, 8:16AM
          • This is a disgraceful piece of sensationalist, tabloid journalism. No facts presented at all, but rather a large number of 'this was denied' and 'that didnt happen' type statements aimed at suggesting practices that have been denied by various parties did happen, without any evidence to support the accusations.

            Has the Age/SMH taken over from the Truth newspaper as the home of smear and innuendo, where journalists will use any means to advance their careers at the expense of the subjects of their stories?

            Commenter
            Time for accountability
            Location
            The regulator
            Date and time
            June 30, 2013, 8:20AM
            • Truly awful stuff. Not even the Bombers deserve to be treated like this.

              Commenter
              Peter Warrington
              Location
              Marrickville
              Date and time
              June 30, 2013, 8:41AM
              • Read this and consider taking a more balanced view of the ramifications for platers etc: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/afl/afl-news/murky-antidoping-web-aims-an-unloaded-gun-at-watson-20130628-2p2pw.html?skin=text-only

                Commenter
                Mazza
                Location
                Victoria
                Date and time
                June 30, 2013, 10:16AM
                • These guys have become pincushions. What a crappy sport.

                  Commenter
                  luke r
                  Date and time
                  June 30, 2013, 10:31AM
                  • Its pretty obvious from your headlines that all of your journalists that write on this issue should re-read the Media Alliance Code Of Ethics or perhaps they never have.

                    Commenter
                    CCC
                    Location
                    CCC
                    Date and time
                    June 30, 2013, 11:47AM
                    • A guinea pig can not ask questions. A human SHOULD, and want to know active ingredients in ANYTHING that THEY are consuming. That's why all bottles and foods are labelled in this country with all manner of active ingredients, nutritional information and even trace items. Would you make your kid swallow medicines YOU know nothing about?.. well if the doctor won't, (or can't), inform the player what's going into them, then why are they the full time doctor risking the teams integrity and the players achievements?! If you think it's too hard to keep track of all the things they are taking, then try a database!... it's not that hard people. Obviously, Jobe was given an unfair advantage and unlike the Eagles saga that all & sundry love to harp on, the Bomber(s?) WERE taking performance enhancing drugs. As for the booing and poor daddies comments, how would he have felt going up against cheats in his day?.... grow up Daddy, it's a mans game and sledging is not illegal from the crowd. You can not sanitise 30000+ peoples' opinions and sterilise the game more than the whingers have already.

                      Commenter
                      AFL rules
                      Date and time
                      June 30, 2013, 1:41PM

                      More comments

                      Make a comment

                      You are logged in as [Logout]

                      All information entered below may be published.

                      Error: Please enter your screen name.

                      Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

                      Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

                      Error: Please enter your comment.

                      Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

                      Post to

                      You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

                      Thank you

                      Your comment has been submitted for approval.

                      Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

                      Featured advertisers