JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Carlton trio fined for tweets critical of umpires


Martin Blake

Jarrad Waite, one of the three Carlton players involved in the Twitter incident.

Jarrad Waite, one of the three Carlton players involved in the Twitter incident. Photo: Sebastian Costanzo

THE three Carlton players involved in public criticism of umpires have been stung $2500 by the AFL, but the decision that sparked most of their ire was deemed to be wrong.

Injured trio Marc Murphy, Jeremy Laidler and Jarrad Waite were fined after an AFL investigation ended yesterday, all for taking to Twitter during the Carlton-West Coast match at Subiaco last weekend. Coach Brett Ratten was given a formal warning for his comment in a press conference about latent bias against teams visiting Subiaco.

''What can you say? We come here knowing that is the lay of the land,'' Ratten had said in response to a journalist's question.

But the AFL umpiring department's review of the most controversial decision, a holding-the-ball adjudication against Aaron Joseph that handed West Coast a goal, found that the umpire concerned had made an error.

''Yes, Joseph did dive on the ball,'' umpiring head Jeff Gieschen told the AFL website yesterday. ''You see him slide in, but he does actually handball the ball. When he handballed the ball away, it was trapped by [West Coast's Jack] Darling, [Michael] Jameson, a number of other players, from that point it was going nowhere. We would have preferred the umpire just blow his whistle and ball the ball up.''

Gieschen said Joseph had been ''harshly treated'', but added the league rules required players who chose to dive on the football to immediately get the ball out. ''We've got to move away from saying 'it's very courageous' and 'it's the essence of the game','' he told the website. ''There are other options.''

The AFL asked Carlton to explain the comments earlier this week and yesterday took into account the fact the players had apologised.

AFL general manager football operations Adrian Anderson said a strong stance was required on criticism of umpires.

''The AFL will not tolerate public denigration or humiliation of umpires as we continue to face very real problems with the retention of umpires throughout Australia. The Sanders Report into umpiring highlighted the need for the AFL to have a zero tolerance approach to criticism of umpires,'' he said.

''A player's use of social media to make comments around umpiring will be subject to the AFL's rules in exactly the same way as comments made in a formal interview or any other media environment, as the AFL competition must continue to set a positive example on conduct towards umpires.''

Gieschen also reached a conclusion on the incredible point kicked by West Coast's Nic Naitanui in the game. Some have suggested Naitanui had broken the rules by moving up to 35 metres in control of the ball without bouncing it, prior to his kick for a behind. But Gieschen said the review found Naitanui momentarily lost control of the ball.

2 comments so far

  • Well! Big Brother "AFL" is here. What can't comment in mistakes as the Umpires are too precious. What about the truth. Even "The Giesh" says it was a mistake! What a joke. No wonder they can't recruit quality Umpires!

    Jay Lafond
    Date and time
    June 20, 2012, 12:51PM
    • Yes clearly commenting on an umpiriring decision via a mobile phone / laptop is a lot more serious than intentionally standing on an opposing player's hand. Get serious AFL. There is still room for others to join me on the Storm bandwagon is this game turns to a joke.

      Adam Blues
      Date and time
      June 20, 2012, 1:02PM

      Make a comment

      You are logged in as [Logout]

      All information entered below may be published.

      Error: Please enter your screen name.

      Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

      Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

      Error: Please enter your comment.

      Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

      Post to

      You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

      Thank you

      Your comment has been submitted for approval.

      Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

      Follow Us on Facebook

      Featured advertisers