JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

End this farce

Date

The AFL must act swiftly before the basic premise of the game is altered.

Judgment day: Chris Judd at the AFL tribunal on Tuesday night.

Judgment day: Chris Judd at the AFL tribunal on Tuesday night. Photo: Simon O'Dwyer

POLICING AFL football has never been an easy task. But the administering of the rules of the game and the league's judicial process is in danger of descending into farce.

What began as a sound enough idea to simplify the disciplinary process via a standardised points system, has become an unwieldy, wildly inconsistent and contradictory mess, one which threatens to leave most of the football community completely disillusioned.

The Chris Judd drama only added fuel to the already raging fires of discontent among the playing fraternity and a significant portion of the fan base about the entire system. And the eventual four-game penalty handed to North Melbourne's Jack Ziebell has brought into question allegedly the game's most fundamental premise: winning the ball.

The old stand-alone tribunal certainly meant lots of paperwork and late nights for more people, but at least it usually delivered a reasonably uniform set of findings. Now we're stuck with an overly complex system a vast majority of people can't comprehend, in which penalties seldom reflect the merits of the incident being assessed.

More importantly, a system in which three levels of officialdom - umpires, the match review panel and the tribunal - deliver verdicts regularly in contrast to and effectively undermining each other.

In the Ziebell case, the tribunal backed the review panel, but certainly not umpire Justin Schmitt, who hadn't paid a free kick as two players - Ziebell and Carlton's Aaron Joseph - collided in their pursuit of the ball.

Schmitt told the Carlton players remonstrating with Ziebell: "He was going for the ball. He just went the ball."

Review panel chairman Mark Fraser, in laying a charge, conceded that Ziebell was looking at the ball, and indeed got his hands to the ball, but slapped a "negligent" rating on Ziebell's actions anyway.

The tribunal determined that Ziebell had a "realistic alternative" to contest the ball rather than jumping in the air, but felt no compunction to explain what it actually was.

I certainly can't fathom what it might have been, other than to stand back and let Joseph have first dibs. If that's what players are now going to have to do, then we've just effectively altered the very essence of our game. And not for the better.

The slide tackle incident kerfuffle earlier this season was more convoluted and ludicrous officiating at work.

North Melbourne's Lindsay Thomas won a free kick for high contact by Sydney's Gary Rohan, only to find himself handed a three-match suspension by the review panel for rough conduct. Rohan broke his leg when the two players, coming from opposite directions on slippery turf, made contact.

The tribunal overturned that verdict, arriving at the conclusion that no one but the review panel had seriously challenged, that this was an unfortunate accident. It also overturned the one-match penalty given to Fremantle's Greg Broughton for a slide into Gold Coast's David Swallow, mainly because the Docker had arrived first to the ball.

Fraser's response after that reversal was hardly encouraging on the consistency front. "Obviously the tribunal decisions … will change our thinking a little bit, because the tribunal didn't believe that that was rough conduct," he said.

So, two judicial bodies with wildly conflicting ideas about what is punishable. And, from the sounds of it, doing very little comparing of notes.

The Thomas and Broughton verdicts were just one of a number of review panel findings with which the tribunal has disagreed. It overturned the ridiculously harsh two-match penalty given to Hawthorn's Brendan Whitecross after Geelong skipper Joel Selwood cannoned into him, a rough conduct charge dished out to the Cats' Steve Johnson, while a striking charge on St Kilda's Leigh Montagna was withdrawn. Montagna had been charged after Melbourne's James Magner ended up with a cut eye, found later to have been accidentally caused by Montagna's knee.

Tribunal counsel Jeff Gleeson was told by Fraser: "Had the match review panel been aware that the contact was made by the knee, the [panel] would not have charged Montagna."

Hang on a second. So the review panel wasn't sure what caused the cut, didn't bother to find out, but charged him anyway. Yep, there's a system ticking over beautifully. Not.

Don't we have a major problem if an umpire, on the spot and viewing an incident in real time and in context, can award a free kick, only for the player who wins the free to end up being suspended?

And don't we have an even bigger problem if the AFL's judicial bodies pick and choose who and what they're going to make an example of? You could argue the Judd "chicken wing" effort was a very bad look, and an adequate suspension symbolically important.

But was Josh Hunt's effort in needlessly standing forcefully on Eddie Betts' hand a few weeks ago any less damaging a look? It was just as unrequired, unsportsmanlike and, to be frank, cowardly. Judd got four weeks, fair enough. Hunt got a $1350 fine.

There's just too many contradictions like that going on, from penalty to penalty, between the umpires running the game and those who deliver the verdicts after it, between the verdicts themselves, overloaded with the asterisks and footnotes of loading, discounts and early pleas. And frankly, in the wake of the Ziebell case particularly, between what we know as the spirit of the game, and how it's being policed.

It's one big mess and nobody - players, fans or club officials - is happy. If the AFL is, it's either content with some pretty low standards or in complete denial about a system that has spun way out of control.

175 comments so far

  • well said. the game as a whole is too focused on removing all grey area from officiating. an on field example is the holding the ball rule, with ridiculous free kicks paid to players second to a contest who actively hold the ball in. what's wrong with letting a human expert make a judgement call?

    Commenter
    micknickbrewer
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    July 18, 2012, 1:44PM
    • Human expert huh. The umpire didn't award the free kick for the Zeibel incident and 25 odd thousand amateurs all voiced their disbelief. The umpiring was poor at times surpassed only by the attitude of the blues players which was abysmal. You need the MRT to catch umpiring mistakes likely brought on by the continual umpire intereference by the AFL higher ups.

      Commenter
      blue bayou
      Date and time
      July 18, 2012, 4:21PM
    • If we are concerned about player welfare, then how about charging players who injure their own teammates through negligent and reckless attacks on the ball?

      Commenter
      J Dog
      Location
      The Yarra
      Date and time
      July 18, 2012, 4:32PM
    • I cannot fathom how Ziebell's infringement, in going for the ball is somehow just as bad as Judd intentionally ripping an arm out of the socket.
      And Judd's claim that he released the arm as soon as he realised that Adams was in pain is bulldust. The only thing stopping Adams from further injury was the fact that his team-mates threw Judd away, which incidentally resulted in Judd receiving a free kick.

      Commenter
      kozeyekan
      Date and time
      July 18, 2012, 7:15PM
    • I agree J Dog. If a player deliberately injures another player the common assault charges should be laid by the police.

      Commenter
      Doug Small
      Date and time
      July 18, 2012, 11:18PM
    • kozeyekan, they were not judged the same. Judd got 4 weeks. Ziebell would have got 2 weeks if his record was any good, but with the bad record loading and no guilty plea it went up to 4.

      Commenter
      Nick
      Location
      Perth
      Date and time
      July 19, 2012, 12:51PM
    • I don't think this is well said at all. Rohan totally forgets the reasoning behind the MRP coming in. Before some people were being suspended for 6 weeks and a guy doing the same the next week got 2. There was no consistency. People now disagree with the consistency, but people that commit the same act, with the same outcomes and the same priors get the same penalties. The issue is so many commentators and fans either don't understand the rules, don't agree with the rules or don't understand the impact of priors or guilty pleas on the suspensions.

      Commenter
      Nick
      Location
      Perth
      Date and time
      July 19, 2012, 12:59PM
  • Nailed it, Rohan. Who knew that the MRP and the Tribunal were separate agencies? I was under the impression the Tribunal dealt with stuff that was too serious for the MRP. Turns out it operates almost entirely independently. So we have Judd's QC and the Tribunal chairman telling the jury to ignore Judd's priors, when for the MRP they have a very heavy bearing on the penalty.
    If the Tribunal's role is to determine guilt or level of charge that's fine but responsibility for the penalty should then go back to the MRP so that at least there is consistency with the penalties.
    I read a report last night which included an alleged quote from Gleeson asking what Judd was prepared to plead guilty to. If this was true, when did plea bargaining come into the process? Why wasn't Ziebel given the option of pleading guilty to negligent but not reckless (or the other way round - whichever is the less serious)?
    As with the bewildering interpretations of holding the ball, in the back, and dropping the ball, which only those behind desks seem to understand and certainly not those playing or paying to watch the games, the MRP/Tribunal imbroglio is yet another fine mess by the AFL. If they didn't have a monopoly, they'd all be on the dole.

    Commenter
    Tom Wills
    Location
    Yarra Park
    Date and time
    July 18, 2012, 1:44PM
    • Yeah, you've nailed it, Rohan. How about this scenario - 1st week of the finals, substitute Dane Swan for Ziebell. Swan jumps in the air to contest the ball and collects an opposition player - MRP gives him four weeks. Collingwood go to Tribunal, penalty stands. Collingwood appeal, penalty stands. Ok, now what. Collingwood go to court and blow the whole shootin' match to the sh*t-house! I don't support the Pies, but if it came to this, I'd support their decision. Rohan, your headline says it all - an absolute farce.

      Commenter
      Sandy
      Location
      Sandy
      Date and time
      July 18, 2012, 3:32PM
    • Tom, Ziebell was charged with negligent contact (the lowest form of contact worth only 1 activation point), he plead not guilty to this. He had the option to plead guilty, but chose to contest it as he said his eyes were on the ball and erroneously thought that was a valid defence. While it is true his eyes were on the ball, the MRP ruled he had other options to compete for the ball (eg; spoil or tackle when Joseph got the ball), therefore as his actions caused head high contact, he must be suspended per the rules as they are currently written. There is no provision in the rules for: "I was trying to get the ball". If you made head high contact and had another option to contest the ball, then you will get suspended. If that was a kick from Murphy and not a handball he likely would not have got suspended. Rightly or wrongly, these are the way the rules are written to try and limit head high contact.

      Commenter
      Nick
      Location
      Perth
      Date and time
      July 19, 2012, 12:56PM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Related Coverage

HuffPost Australia

AFL 2015

Round 1
Thu, 02 AprTimes shown AEDT
CAR 78vs RIC 105 Report Stats
Sat, 04 AprTimes shown AEDT
MEL 115vs GCF 89 Stats
SYD 72vs ESS 60 Stats
BRI 74vs COL 86 Stats
WBU 97vs WCE 87 Stats
Sun, 05 AprTimes shown AEST
STK 78vs GWS 87 Stats
ADE 140vs NTH 63 Stats
FRE 75vs PTA 68 Stats
Mon, 06 AprTimes shown AEST
HAW 123vs GEE 61 Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 2
Fri, 10 AprTimes shown AEST
WCE 131vs CAR 62 Stats
Sat, 11 AprTimes shown AEST
RIC 66vs WBU 85 Report Stats
GWS 101vs MEL 56 Stats
COL 63vs ADE 90 Report Stats
GCF 76vs STK 104 Stats
PTA 44vs SYD 92 Stats
Sun, 12 AprTimes shown AEST
GEE 60vs FRE 104 Stats
ESS 78vs HAW 76 Stats
NTH 133vs BRI 51 Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 3
Fri, 17 AprTimes shown AEST
COL 140vs STK 66 Stats
Sat, 18 AprTimes shown AEST
CAR 84vs ESS 105 Stats
ADE 80vs MEL 55 Stats
SYD 111vs GWS 90 Report Stats
NTH 105vs PTA 113 Stats
BRI 58vs RIC 137 Stats
Sun, 19 AprTimes shown AEST
HAW 127vs WBU 57 Stats
GEE 105vs GCF 96 Stats
WCE 81vs FRE 111 Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 4
Fri, 24 AprTimes shown AEST
RIC 51vs MEL 83 Stats
Sat, 25 AprTimes shown AEST
STK 81vs CAR 121 Report Report Stats
ESS 49vs COL 69 Report Stats
GWS 119vs GCF 53 Stats
PTA 99vs HAW 91 Stats
FRE 74vs SYD 60 Stats
Sun, 26 AprTimes shown AEST
BRI 65vs WCE 118 Stats
GEE 67vs NTH 83 Stats
WBU 125vs ADE 68 Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 5
Fri, 01 MayTimes shown AEST
CAR 45vs COL 120 Stats
Sat, 02 MayTimes shown AEST
RIC 76vs GEE 85 Stats
SYD 73vs WBU 77 Stats
GCF 118vs BRI 54 Stats
NTH 70vs HAW 130 Stats
WCE 120vs GWS 33 Stats
Sun, 03 MayTimes shown AEST
MEL 50vs FRE 118 Stats
STK 80vs ESS 82 Stats
ADE 91vs PTA 115 Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 6
Fri, 08 MayTimes shown AEST
COL 59vs GEE 100 Stats
Sat, 09 MayTimes shown AEST
NTH 109vs RIC 74 Stats
WBU 87vs STK 94 Stats
GWS 108vs HAW 98 Stats
GCF 78vs ADE 119 Stats
MEL 50vs SYD 88 Stats
FRE 80vs ESS 52 Stats
Sun, 10 MayTimes shown AEST
CAR 75vs BRI 84 Report Stats
PTA 68vs WCE 78 Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 7
Fri, 15 MayTimes shown AEST
ESS 82vs NTH 93 Stats
Sat, 16 MayTimes shown AEST
ADE 119vs STK 73 Stats
HAW 155vs MEL 50 Stats
CAR 57vs GWS 135 Stats
SYD 120vs GEE 77 Stats
WCE 135vs GCF 43 Stats
Sun, 17 MayTimes shown AEST
WBU 88vs FRE 101 Stats
RIC 105vs COL 100 Report Stats
BRI 102vs PTA 65 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 8
Fri, 22 MayTimes shown AEST
GEE 140vs CAR 63 Report Stats
Sat, 23 MayTimes shown AEST
STK 78vs WCE 131 Report Stats
GWS 108vs ADE 84 Report Stats
GCF 63vs COL 132 Report Stats
HAW 69vs SYD 73 Report Stats
FRE 115vs NTH 42 Report Stats
Sun, 24 MayTimes shown AEST
ESS 136vs BRI 78 Report Stats
MEL 103vs WBU 64 Report Stats
PTA 43vs RIC 76 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 9
Fri, 29 MayTimes shown AEST
SYD 122vs CAR 62 Report Stats
Sat, 30 MayTimes shown AEST
HAW 93vs GCF 40 Report Stats
MEL 54vs PTA 115 Report Stats
WBU 113vs GWS 68 Report Stats
RIC 72vs ESS 59 Report Stats
ADE 57vs FRE 68 Report Stats
Sun, 31 MayTimes shown AEST
BRI 86vs STK 108 Report Stats
COL 112vs NTH 95 Report Stats
WCE 120vs GEE 64 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 10
Fri, 05 JunTimes shown AEST
FRE 70vs RIC 97 Report Stats
Sat, 06 JunTimes shown AEST
CAR 90vs ADE 99 Report Stats
GCF 41vs SYD 93 Report Stats
ESS 53vs GEE 122 Report Stats
PTA 100vs WBU 62 Report Stats
Sun, 07 JunTimes shown AEST
GWS 97vs BRI 67 Report Stats
NTH 85vs WCE 75 Report Stats
STK 69vs HAW 132 Report Stats
Mon, 08 JunTimes shown AEST
MEL 85vs COL 110 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 11
Fri, 12 JunTimes shown AEST
PTA 69vs GEE 92 Report Stats
Sat, 13 JunTimes shown AEST
GCF 46vs FRE 53 Report Stats
WCE 96vs ESS 46 Report Stats
NTH 75vs SYD 91 Report Report Stats
Sun, 14 JunTimes shown AEST
COL 119vs GWS 77 Report Stats
STK 85vs MEL 83 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 12
Thu, 18 JunTimes shown AEST
ADE 85vs HAW 114 Report Stats
Fri, 19 JunTimes shown AEST
RIC 70vs WCE 90 Report Stats
Sat, 20 JunTimes shown AEST
CAR 110vs PTA 106 Report Stats
GWS 61vs NTH 117 Report Stats
WBU 146vs BRI 74 Report Stats
Sun, 21 JunTimes shown AEST
GEE 89vs MEL 113 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 13
Thu, 25 JunTimes shown AEST
FRE 80vs COL 73 Report Stats
Fri, 26 JunTimes shown AEST
SYD 77vs RIC 95 Report Stats
Sat, 27 JunTimes shown AEST
HAW 114vs ESS 76 Report Stats
BRI 69vs ADE 82 Report Stats
STK 56vs WBU 62 Report Stats
Sun, 28 JunTimes shown AEST
CAR 103vs GCF 69 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 14
Thu, 02 JulTimes shown AEST
SYD 94vs PTA 84 Report Stats
Fri, 03 JulTimes shown AEST
COL 91vs HAW 101 Report Stats
Sat, 04 JulTimes shown AEST
RIC 78vs GWS 69 Report Stats
GCF 125vs NTH 70 Report Stats
WBU 64vs CAR 53 Report Stats
MEL 60vs WCE 114 Report Stats
Sun, 05 JulTimes shown AEST
ESS 52vs STK 162 Stats
ADE vs GEE 15:20Adelaide Oval
FRE 84vs BRI 48 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 15
Thu, 09 JulTimes shown AEST
PTA 66vs COL 63 Report Stats
Fri, 10 JulTimes shown AEST
RIC 71vs CAR 41 Report Stats
Sat, 11 JulTimes shown AEST
ESS 69vs MEL 60 Report Stats
WBU 95vs GCF 73 Report Stats
NTH 120vs GEE 79 Report Stats
WCE 147vs ADE 91 Report Stats
Sun, 12 JulTimes shown AEST
GWS 84vs STK 49 Report Stats
HAW 115vs FRE 43 Report Stats
BRI 49vs SYD 70 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 16
Fri, 17 JulTimes shown AEST
NTH 93vs ESS 68 Report Stats
Sat, 18 JulTimes shown AEST
GEE 72vs WBU 64 Report Stats
GCF 79vs GWS 94 Report Stats
COL 56vs WCE 87 Report Stats
SYD 57vs HAW 146 Report Stats
FRE 95vs CAR 53 Report Stats
Sun, 19 JulTimes shown AEST
MEL 60vs BRI 36 Report Stats
PTA 113vs ADE 116 Report Stats
STK 73vs RIC 89 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 17
Fri, 24 JulTimes shown AEST
CAR 35vs HAW 173 Report Stats
Sat, 25 JulTimes shown AEST
GWS 42vs GEE 69 Stats
ADE 125vs GCF 80 Stats
RIC 78vs FRE 82 Stats
ESS 116vs PTA 129 Stats
BRI 38vs NTH 110 Report Stats
Sun, 26 JulTimes shown AEST
WBU 104vs COL 86 Report Stats
MEL 46vs STK 83 Report Stats
WCE 103vs SYD 51 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 18
Fri, 31 JulTimes shown AEST
HAW 53vs RIC 71 Report Stats
Sat, 01 AugTimes shown AEST
GEE 113vs BRI 57 Stats
COL 54vs MEL 91 Report Stats
SYD 117vs ADE 65 Report Stats
CAR 54vs NTH 118 Report Stats
GCF 83vs WCE 83 Report Stats
Sun, 02 AugTimes shown AEST
PTA 112vs STK 49 Report Stats
ESS 40vs WBU 127 Report Stats
FRE 84vs GWS 63 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 19
Fri, 07 AugTimes shown AEST
ADE 88vs RIC 52 Report Stats
Sat, 08 AugTimes shown AEST
COL 105vs CAR 87 Report Stats
WBU 128vs PTA 64 Report Stats
BRI 100vs GCF 114 Report Stats
GEE 95vs SYD 63 Report Stats
WCE 74vs HAW 88 Report Stats
Sun, 09 AugTimes shown AEST
MEL 92vs NTH 127 Report Stats
GWS 93vs ESS 61 Report Stats
STK 59vs FRE 96 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 20
Fri, 14 AugTimes shown AEST
SYD 87vs COL 76 Report Stats
Sat, 15 AugTimes shown AEST
ESS 59vs ADE 171 Report Stats
NTH 120vs STK 83 Report Stats
PTA 111vs GWS 90 Report Stats
GEE 85vs HAW 121 Report Stats
BRI 131vs CAR 67 Report Stats
Sun, 16 AugTimes shown AEST
RIC 138vs GCF 55 Report Stats
WBU 153vs MEL 55 Report Stats
FRE 80vs WCE 104 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 21
Fri, 21 AugTimes shown AEST
HAW 86vs PTA 108 Report Stats
Sat, 22 AugTimes shown AEST
COL 56vs RIC 147 Report Stats
GWS 44vs SYD 133 Report Stats
GCF 97vs ESS 95 Report Stats
STK 97vs GEE 97 Report Stats
ADE 131vs BRI 44 Report Stats
Sun, 23 AugTimes shown AEST
NTH 94vs FRE 83 Report Stats
CAR 78vs MEL 55 Report Stats
WCE 162vs WBU 85 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 22
Fri, 28 AugTimes shown AEST
GEE 62vs COL 110 Report Stats
Sat, 29 AugTimes shown AEST
GWS 132vs CAR 51 Report Stats
HAW 134vs BRI 62 Report Stats
NTH 73vs WBU 96 Report Stats
ESS 47vs RIC 74 Report Stats
GCF 51vs PTA 88 Report Stats
Sun, 30 AugTimes shown AEST
ADE 126vs WCE 69 Report Stats
STK 38vs SYD 135 Report Stats
FRE 108vs MEL 54 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 23
Fri, 04 SepTimes shown AEST
RIC ($1.29)vs NTH ($3.60) 19:50ES
Sat, 05 SepTimes shown AEST
GEE ($2.60)vs ADE ($1.50) 13:05SS
BRI ($4.50)vs WBU ($1.20) 13:45G
PTA ($1.10)vs FRE ($6.50) 15:50Adelaide Oval
HAW ($1.01)vs CAR ($17.00) 16:40MCG
SYD ($1.04)vs GCF ($11.00) 19:20SCG
WCE ($1.04)vs STK ($11.00) 19:40Domain Stadium
Sun, 06 SepTimes shown AEST
MEL ($3.20)vs GWS ($1.36) 13:10ES
COL ($1.28)vs ESS ($3.70) 15:20MCG
View All Fixtures
AFL 2015
Overall standings
Team P W L D % Pts
Fremantle 21 17 4 0 125.10 68
West Coast Eagles 21 15 5 1 143.00 62
Hawthorn 21 15 6 0 156.77 60
Sydney Swans 21 15 6 0 124.11 60
Richmond 21 14 7 0 121.39 56
Western Bulldogs 21 14 7 0 116.76 56
Adelaide Crows 20 13 7 0 119.10 54
North Melbourne 21 13 8 0 109.08 52
View all
 

Follow Us on Facebook

Featured advertisers