It's every drafter's dream. The number one pick. You can snap up any player you want, and lock the best man in the game into your side right from the word 'go'. The only question is, who is it?
If you take a look at the draft rankings from the Footy Prophet team, you'll see unanimous support for Gary Ablett Jnr as the number one pick. This is no surprise. Gary is a proven fantasy gun. He's averaged 110 or better five years running, longer than any other player in the competition, and lifted his average over 120 in 2012. “You'd be mad to go past Gary with the number one pick.” That's what I said, two months ago, before I started work on our upcoming fantasy draft prospectus. Now, I've got to eat my words. If I score the number one pick in a draft this year, the name I read out won't be Gary's. It'll be Dane Swan. And if you're in the same situation, you should be saying the exact same thing - here's why.
#1: Swan's a better scorer
What you want in a fantasy draft is to get the maximum points for your pick. So, when you've got the first overall, it's hard to go past Swanny, who finished with a higher average than any other player in the competition in 2012. Many wonder if Swanny can keep it up. I don't know for sure that he'll manage 130+ again, but I would back him to be the best in the competition again in 2013. Swanny's got seven years of 100+ averages under his belt, and three years of 120+. He seems to defy the rules, most notably, the one about things that go up needing to come down.
Ultimate Footy preview
Swans hold off brilliant Blues
Cats too potent for Crows
Saints edge wounded Dogs
Harvey Roo's record breaker
Shane Yarran in for Pavlich
FootyFix: will Adelaide upset Geelong at home?
Bombers rookie detained over Uber incident
Ultimate Footy preview
Sports journalist Michael Gleeson previews Ultimate Footy, a new draft style fantasy AFL game.
- This article refers to Ultimate Footy, The Age's new draft-based fantasy football game. CLICK HERE to find out more
The terrifying thing is that Swan might even take a step forward in 2013. He massively increased his average in the second half of 2012, with his after-the-bye average being a 16 points increase on his before-the-bye average. He finished the year with a run of ten straight scores above 100. It bodes very well for a bountiful 2013.
In comparison, Gary played second fiddle to Swan in terms of his 2012 average. He's got five years of 110+ scoring, but this is his first year at that “ultra premium” 120+ mark. It's something very few achieve, and even fewer can hold on to. I think Gary can keep it up, but the fact that Swan is a proven performer at this level, with the capacity to go even higher, gives him the edge.
#2: He's more consistent
There's no worse feeling in a draft league than when your captain and star player goes missing on the field and only brings in sixty or seventy points for the week. Blech! It's bound to happen every now and then, though, and there's really no avoiding it, right? Well... no. There is no avoiding it. Sorry if I got your hopes up. But you can minimise it, and Swanny is the perfect choice for that. In 2013, every player in the league had at least four games where they failed to score above 100, which is generally the pass-mark for a good captaincy selection. Ever player, that is, except Swanny. In 18 games last year, he only scored below 100 once – and even then, managed 95, which is so damn close it's scary. Whether he can replicate such excellent consistency again in 2013 remains to be seen, but there's no doubt he stands head and shoulders above the rest.
By way of comparison, Gary dipped below 100 on four occasions in 2012. Two were fairly respectable scores of 97 and 99, barely worth noting, but the others were 89 and, at his lowest point, 61. In a draft league, a 61 from your captain can be the difference between a win or a loss.
#3: He'll play more games.... probably.
If you've taken a look at Gary and Swanny yourself, you've probably seen one thing about their respective 2012 seasons that seemingly sets Gary at a level above Swanny, and that's the number of games they each played. Gary managed 20, while Swanny could pull only 18. High scoring and consistency aside, no one likes a star player posting doughnuts, and if you can find one who does so less often, you'll take it.
Let's take a look at Swanny's absences. He missed two early with a hamstring, but he's got no lingering injury concerns. The others are more glaring. He sensationally missed two towards the end of the season with a club-imposed suspension, after breaking a pact the players had made about not drinking alcohol until the end of the season. What you've got to ask yourself is, will this be feature of Swanny in the future? Taking a look back at his record, Swan is practically a golden boy (in fantasy terms at least!). Before 2012 he'd played 20+ games for six years running, and during that period, he had four straight years where he played every game in the season. I think Swanny's learnt his lesson over the suspension, and with no injury concerns to speak of, could easily play a full season in 2012, or at least get 20+ once again. By way of comparison, Gary is a little less consistent with his games. He has dropped below 20 games twice in the past, and hasn't played a full season since 2007. He might have racked up more games than Swan in 2012, and there's the chance he could again in 2013, but I think Swan is just as likely, if not more likely, to play a full season. In short, this isn't a big enough point of difference to put Gary above Swanny in the rankings.
Look, if you were getting a free car, and one was faster and less likely to break down, which one would you pick? The one that doesn't play for Collingwood, obviously, so I'll understand if you prefer Gary to Swan. He's as good a choice as any. That said, I think the numbers speak for themselves – if you want the number one man with the number one pick, Swanny is your guy.
One to consider...
There is one other option. It's one that very few will even consider, let alone take. Matthew Boyd. He had the fourth best average in 2012, but was the only player in the top four to play every game, and as such, finished the season with more points scored in total than anyone else in the league. If you want the most points for you pick – not week to week, but as a season total – Boyd is as close as you can get to being a lock for every single game, and has consistently averaged around 115 for the year for three years running. People will call you mad if you take him at the first selection, and, okay, they're probably right.
That said, insanity may pay great dividends, my friends!
Article supplied by footyprophet.com – football analysis and opinion with a fantasy focus