Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Cherrypicker 
 Rock stars that need to retire 

Rock stars that need to retire

There's a frightening phenomenon sweeping down from the UK and the US, which is just starting to bite in Australia. We'll be feeling the effects for months, possibly years, and nobody knows quite how bad it's going to get. I'm talking of course about the wave of baby boomer nostalgia acts pouring, unchecked, into the country.

We've already had Neil Young, Leonard Cohen, Jeff Beck, Eric Clapped-out and The Who (or 'the two', now that Keith Moon and John Entwistle are playing the great gig in the sky), and it's just been announced that we're getting Simon and Garfunkel. Even Cheech and Chong (cough, cough) have announced a tour.

What's next, are they going to get The Band back together?

Kevin Rudd needs to act, quickly. I say, introduce compulsory retirement for rock stars past their prime, or some sort of screening process for the internationals, to save people from themselves. Because just as teenage girls find it hard to resist the sweet allure of alcopops (and it's sooo much harder to mix spirits with soft drinks), baby boomers can't resist an opportunity to relive the summer of love, in their winter of very content - no matter how bad the show is likely to be.

See, rock stars aren't meant to get old. It may not be fair, but that's how it is.

Other music genres are different. Beethoven allegedly wrote some of his best music in his dotage - and he was deaf, too, so maybe he just fluked those last string quartets - but he wasn't writing about sex and drugs and cars. Well, he may have been, who knows what that music's about? But he certainly didn't have to windmill a violin, a la Pete Townshend, after he was wheeled on stage. He didn't even have to play it.

Blues musicians seem to be able to age gracefully. John Lee Hooker and Muddy Waters still had their mojos working right up until they got their own little piece of heaven. They didn't get better as they got older, but they were still pretty damn good. There was almost some extra charisma about them that came from having lead a full life, and they could sit in a chair on stage without it seeming … wrong.

Mind you, Hooker did have the odd seniors moment. Van Morrison convinced a very old Hooker to join him onstage for a version of Them's Gloria. In the rehearsal Morrison did the standard spelling out of the girl's name: 'G, L, O, R, I, A', then called out, 'What's her name, Johnny?'

'Mary-Lou!'

Some of the jazz players kept it up into old age, too. Louis Armstrong might have slowed down the trumpet playing, but his essence, his irrepressible spirit, was undimmed, and that voice was still amazing.

But rock is different. Pop, too. Madonna at 60? She will have gone from Like a Virgin to like, aversion.

Madge will have to dance, because lip-syncing alone won't cut it, and dancing gets harder as you get older. When James Brown went 'ooooowww' as he went into the splits in his last Australian shows, it was because it HURT, man. Mick Jagger still insists on pulling out his strutting chicken moves, but it's obviously tougher now – and he looks ridiculous. Stand still, Mick, for Chrissakes.

Mick's guitarist, Keef, has other problems. He's flat out just dealing with the senior moments. Remember that Keith Richards single-handedly accounted for about a quarter of all the drugs consumed between 1965 and 1980. There are moments in Shine a Light, Martin Scorsese's film of the Stones playing live last year, when he looks like he's not sure where he is, let alone which song he's playing. He might be the human riff (or is that the human spliff?), but he's losing it.

(If it sounds like I'm being ageist here, I should point out I'm on the wrong side of 40. As my father regularly and gleefully reminds me, I'm over the hill and gathering speed - ha ha ha, good one, dad.)

Rock stars are supposed to die a spectacular death, preferably in a plane crash or by choking on their own vomit. Nobody put it more succinctly than The Who in My Generation: 'Hope I die before I get old'. Presumably, that's how a young Pete Townshend actually felt. However, it didn't stop a shrinking, bespectacled, 65-year-old Roger Daltrey singing that very line in Sydney a few weeks ago, with no hint of irony.

Hey, how about: Hope I get old before I die?

Townshend, to his credit, and ever one to swim against the tide (he must be the only performer at Woodstock who thought it sucked), updated the lyrics of My Generation to dispel all notions of belonging to the greatest generation, in the greatest time in history blah blah blah. He riffed on a theme of, 'My generation … f---ed it up', before yelling, 'It's over to YOU now'.

Thanks, Pete.

At least he's honest, which is more than I can say for Simon and Garfunkel. They've billed their upcoming tour as 'Old Friends', which is interesting seeing as they haven't talked to each other for a couple of decades. The tension was obvious even at the big tour announcement in New York. Pressed on whether they had put their troubles behind them, the best they could come up with was a clipped, 'We're fine, thank you'.

So I guess they mean 'old friends' in the same way that Peter Costello and John Howard are old friends.

The bridge over troubled water smells suspiciously like money to me. Simon put it this way: “We were both the beneficiaries of the '60s and also contributors to it. And that's something I think the people will get a lot of pleasure from seeing,” he said.

Right. The people will get a lot of pleasure from seeing how stupidly rich you've become.

Maybe they will. I have to say, though, that some of those songs are going to sound a bit dated. Feelin' Groovy, anyone? Maybe, in the spirit of Pete Towshend, they should try for a new version more in tune with the times: 'Hello streetlight, cracked and broken/ I've come to watch your junkies smokin'/ Ain't you got no ice for me/ dootin doo doo, feelin' random.'

I don't know. I'm just trying to help.

So what DO the fans want? Maybe it's enough just to experience the frission of being in a stadium with a bona fide music legend. Maybe it's worth 200 bucks to be able to tell people you were within two kilometres of Mick Jagger.

It must be worth something, because people go and hear crappy shows for those bragging rights. And let's face it, some of these shows are pretty bad. Singers struggle to hit the high notes and forget the words - or, like Lucinda Williams in Canberra a few days ago, read them straight off a music stand between every line. Endings fall apart. Guitarists miss cues and play bum notes.

But I've noticed something about nostalgia gigs: there's an emperors-got-new-clothes phenomenon at work.

For example. The last time Bob Dylan came to play Canberra, in 2003, I decided it was time I shared the same hemisphere with arguably the greatest songwriter of the last 50 years. I can't remember what I paid, but it wasn't spare change - maybe $120.

What did I get for my hard-earned money? I got a supremely grumpy Bob Dylan, who didn't even pick up a guitar until, like, the last two songs. He played piano instead. Piano! Acknowledge or talk to the crowd – what, are you crazy?

Singing-wise, I went to the show with realistic expectations. Counting on a soaring vocal performance from an ageing Bob Dylan is like expecting an incendiary rock gig from John Farnham. You're going to be bitterly disappointed.

But even with the bar set way down low, I was shocked. Dylan sounded like a dying frog gargling on gravel, stuck on one note, in the wrong key. 'Melody' was non-existent, and it wasn't until half way through a song, when I'd finally make out a line, that I'd think, 'Oh yeah, that's It Ain't Me, Babe'. It was like a segment of Spics and Specs: guess the song.

So it was absolute shite. But here's the thing: I checked out a few blogs afterwards and people RAVED about the show.

One blogger wrote, 'His keyboard playing is just stunning … and his harmonica playing fantastic [!]. As for his voice - it's strong and full of variety - as good as I've heard and just such a treat'.

Say what?! Were we at the same concert? I'm sorry pal, the emperor was starkers and you know it.

I guess if you've forked out $100 plus for a show, you're disinclined to say, 'Jeez, I pissed that away, didn't I?’ It's why I think people are deliberately vague when they talk about these shows. 'Oh yeah, I saw The Stones, man. They played a lot of songs. A lot! All the hits.'

It doesn't matter that they were sloppy, the sound was blown away by the cross wind and you were far enough away to be almost in a different state. It's apparently enough that you were technically at the same concert.

The baby boomer fans themselves are an embarrassment. They've either completely surrendered to middle age, spouting grey hair from their ears and noses, wearing comfortable clothes and being led around by large bellies – or, like Glenn A Baker, they squeeze into jeans, wear psychedelic shirts and put on ridiculous hats in a vain attempt to look young.

Many of them haven't been to a concert for years, possibly decades, with the result that they have forgotten that concerts are supposed to be a bit, I don't know, exciting. I saw couples around me at The Who concert who, for all their animation, could have been at home watching The Bill. They were catatonic.

Maybe they were actually THINKING about The Bill ('I wonder if Reg got out of that hold-up situation?'). Hey, I know I was – it was a Tuesday night.

So who still does a good show? The Who were surprisingly good, even if, as Townshend said recently, they're really like a Who tribute show now. They're a GREAT tribute band.

Leonard Cohen was by all accounts wonderful on his Australian tour - and he's 74 years old. A friend of mine described it 'life-changingly good - the most most most gracious, exceptional performance I've ever seen, by such a long way'. And this woman has taste, so I believe her.

Mind you, it wasn't exactly rock'n'roll, was it?

I'm sure part of the deal with Cohen was just a catch-up thing, where everybody has finally realised he wrote great songs (thanks, Jeff Buckley), and wanted to let him know before he carks it. It's weird, because he couldn't get arrested in the Seventies. In fact, he was considered kind of a joke.

Jeff Beck in Sydney was just plain lazy, figuring that stroking the guitar occasionally was enough (and it was – he got a standing ovation).

Who do you reckon still pulls their weight?

To wrap up, here's a verse from a song by Randy Newman on this subject, called I'm Dead (But I Don't Know It):

I have nothing left to say

But I'm gonna say it anyway

Thirty years upon the stage

And I hear the people say

Why won't he go away?

If the baby boomer artists are dead, and they don't know it, I reckon someone’s got to tell them. It might as well be me.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Having older brothers I was brought up on the Who music, I took my 16 year old to the Sydney concert and both he and I thought that they were brilliant. No comparison to the so called modern music and waste of space rap music.
Posted by Barry, 15/04/2009 3:09:39 PM
Dave, perhaps you should go see some of these bands before being so judgmental. I went to see The Who in Sydney; with the exception of a couple of 'new' songs it was a fantastic show, probably the best live show I've ever seen. Ok, I'd have loved to see them whilst Entwistle was still around, but even so, The Who playing live should be mandatory study for a number of todays Rock Bands.
Posted by Suggs, 15/04/2009 3:45:17 PM
"Jeff Beck in Sydney was just plain lazy, figuring that stroking the guitar occasionally was enough (and it was – he got a standing ovation)." The trouble with this sort of lazy writing is that one can just go to youtube to see and hear for ones self how Jeff Beck was playing in Sydney. If that is "stroking the guitar occasionally" the I suggest that Dave Curry gets a guitar and shows us how it should be done. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_uRFGBj0dM
Posted by Life on the Loire, 15/04/2009 4:52:14 PM
I went to see Johnny Cash and Kris Kristoffersen at Bruce back in about 1994. Kris looked like a homeless derelict and sang like one; while Johnny had a 'bad cold' and croaked through a dozen numbers. But the real nadir of the whole thing were the obese Carter sisters wobbling about like electrocuted blancmanges singing some sort of tuneless hillbilly songs. But right at the end, the show really hit rock bottom when Johnny's 'personal preacher' came on stage to offer us all a chance at salvation. He was wearing jeans and one of those western shirts with the leather elbows and shoulders; plus the big texan cowboy boots! So it's been going on for a while. Time they all retired.
Posted by Jack Richards, 15/04/2009 5:46:17 PM
i had the misfortune to be stuck listening to commercial radio for a couple of days over the weekend while helping someone move and all i can say is i think there are a couple of canberra radio stations that need to retire their Cd collections and start again, too.
Posted by Richard Wadd, 15/04/2009 6:54:05 PM
I'm 35. Apparently that puts me at the upper end of Generation X. I've been a Neil Young fan for a while now and if you had suggested that some of his latest albums were not great I wouldn't have disagreed. I went to his concert in January however and it was absolutely outstanding. I would describe his electric guitar work as totally mesmerising and awesomely good despite his age. On the other hand people say that it is amazing that Keith Richards hasn't died yet. Looking at his face, I'm not sure he hasn't been dead for 20 years.
Posted by StanleyBruce, 15/04/2009 7:07:10 PM
One entertainer who never disappoints is John Farnham. He is the best - always has been, always will be. I guarantee he always delivers a show that you walk away from feeling entertained - a rare thing these days. His voice is second to none, he talks to the audience and involves them and has the ability to make every person feel he is singing just for them.
Posted by TheWiz, 15/04/2009 8:55:49 PM
I have been to many "incendiary" John Farnham gigs, with the audience on it's feet from the first song. More recently I attended sound relief and stood amongst young and old as they spontaneously acknowleged John's incredible talent!! 50 I may be but I'm not dead! let us appreciate real music...not manufactured. Simple solution dont like it, don't buy a ticket!
Posted by Maree, 15/04/2009 9:03:33 PM
The global financial crisis has effected everyone. The bigger the investments the bigger the loss. You can't blame some from coming out of retirement they still have to live like the rest of us. No-ones asking you to go see them.
Posted by Lynne of Brisbane, 15/04/2009 9:34:23 PM
Where to start with this one? First off, the author needs to understand what nostalgia is: a sentiment for a time gone-by. With this in mind, The Who fit well into this category, as do Simon & Garfunkel. But S &G aren't billing themselves as anything other than that-- as "Old Friends." What makes The Who fit into the category of a nostalgia act is that they haven't put out anything new in decades. They continue to tour on old material. Their fans come to hear the old stuff. The fans hear it and like it, The Who makes money. Everybody's happy. As much as people want Dylan, Young, Cohen, Clapton, etc. to be nostalgic acts, the truth is that they are NOT. They keep putting out new stuff and performing it. This, by definition, keeps them out of the nostalgia category. Yes, they will have nostalgic fans who go to those concerts to recapture times gone by. Eventually those fans get their fill, or come away with bitter disappointment that they didn't get it, and cease to come back. Nostalgic Dylan fans are a perfect example of this: they come to see and hear the Dylan of the '60's and '70's. Many of them aren't even familiar with the stuff he's put out since the '80's. Probably most of them don't know he's got a new album due out April 27th. So, they go to his shows, thinking they will get the Dylan they remember. Instead, they got modern-day Dylan. They get upset that he's not nostalgic as they are. This brings me to my last point: the author here is more nostalgic than the acts he puts down for being so. He wants Dylan to be like he was; Young to be young, etc. He is nostalgic for those versions of the performers and is now upset that they aren't.
Posted by redkim, 16/04/2009 12:51:36 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >
Cherrypicker
Canberra Times reporter Dave Curry casts a discerning eye over the music world to bring you new and old gems from a variety of genres.
Pete Townshend
Pete Townshend

Most popular articles

Australian Running Festival



The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...