Opinion 
 Blogs 
 John McNamara 
 Green lights to follow all footprints in a red shoe shuffle 

Green lights to follow all footprints in a red shoe shuffle

Monday

He’s a man in white and on a mission, the divine catholic greenhouse abatement society is holding a big show in Sydney, bringing abatement pilgrims from across the world to the city of dreams in a carbon neutral kind of way.

Flying into Sydney, the man in white, the chief executive officer, indicates it’s time the oldest corporation in the world actually and finally entered the business for which it was named, that the one true abatement society start reducing its carbon footprint.

“That’s why I wear the red shoes. Shoes, footprint, get it?” he says.

“From now on when you see the red shoes, you’ll think footprint. You’ll ask yourself the question: what am I doing to save the planet?”

Tuesday

< p>The man in white enters the retreat set up for him to rest at before his big day out later in the week. The retreat has its own solar panels, wind turbine and composting toilet.

Inspired by this man’s crusade, the banks put up interest rates.

“It’s all about the footprint,” says a bank spokesman. “By increasing interest rates, householders with mortgages have less to spend on carbon emitting activities, their carbon footprint, like driving, using electricity for heating, buying food - which we know are all responsible for emissions,” he says.

“We all need to do out bit and the red shoes just say it all really.”

The spokesman then charges a fee for the interview.

Wednesday

Cadel Evans’ footprint is pretty small. The champion cyclist will ride around France on no more than some lubrication for his bicycle chain, a succession of really big pasta meals and several leg massages.

In the Prime Minister’s office, red shoes and Cadel Evans come together in a flash of inspiration.

“What we need,” says an adviser, “is a stationary bicycle in every home, hook them up to the mains and pay a feed-in electricity tariff. We’ll fix climate change and obesity with one measure.”

The adviser grins at the minister, thinking this is the angle that will be a winner later that day at the National Press Club. Senator Wong has one of those moments when she wonders why she bothers.

Thursday

< p>The coal industry meeting is tossing around ideas for alternative uses for the stuff they dig out of the ground, now that burning it is going out of fashion.

“It’s black, it’s shiny and it’s very, very dirty,” says one industry heavy weight, “kids would love it. How about we get together with Lego to market a line in black building bricks, coal bricks.”

There’s silence around the table as the meeting thinks back to the good old days when coal was king and everyone wanted to be their friends.

Friday

Thinking about footprints and red shoes and such, Qantas decides to do its bit.

“There’s good news and bad news,” a spokeswoman says. “The bad news is - at this stage - we can only cut 1500 jobs, we’d like to do more but we can’t because we still do need people to fly the planes, sell the cigarettes in-flight and repair any punctured tyres on the landing gear and so on.

“The good news though is that those 1500 people, now jobless, will be doing their bit to reduce the company’s carbon footprint. Without jobs they won’t buy food and other so-called essentials – which produce greenhouse gases in their production.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
MOPPING UP THE LAST CRUMBS OF AN ANTIQUATED PARADIGM – CLIMATE NO CHANGE Who will speak for science when the barbarian is already inside the gate? Science today, that triumph of humanity over primitive superstition, that monument to the evolutionary miracle of the human brain, is now being debased by barbarians. The Church of green warming religions is very big in Christian Europe. Everyday anythings are now blamed on warming and reported uncritically by media. The dumbed-down, trumped-up science is the modern religious medicine used to mesmerise the masses. Institutionalised across the globe, politicians and activists of all persuasions, present their arguments in terms of what ‘the trumped-up science’ is telling them to do. The so called “world’s best thinkers” have grabbed and promoted this moral agenda emphasising sinful behaviour change over technological innovation - purchasing the absolution of carbon offsets for their sins. Climate environmentalism is a political mission with a religious agenda, offering disciples the delicious prospect of being in the right and running things under the motherhood banner of saving the planet - very attractive to the young and fearful old. Activists demand the high moral ground, with an epitaph chanting “O Mother Earth… pardon me for trampling on you.” Any movement enforcing this degree of moral certitude is a sign of uncertain things to come. The science of future climate is in its infancy and is multi-disciplinary, no one branch knows the whole story. The truth is - climate prediction is hard, half of the variability in the climate system is not predictable and modellers don’t expect to do well. We are being asked to take irreversible actions today, to produce un-testable postulates for tomorrow, based on computer simulated predictions in excess of 100 years. Very iffy stuff! When the Western world became increasingly pessimistic about Man’s carbon footprint, science was hijacked to decode nature’s message. The more scientists research global climate, the more we learn how much they don’t know. The more alarmists talk, the more we realize they know even less. We live on a majestically dynamic planet with intertwining complexes. Scenarios for future climate involve natural equations of infinite variables. Fluctuation in the Sun’s intensity is arguably the controlling factor in Earth’s climate. To assume human induced carbon emissions alone will significantly alter predictions is pretentious pseudo-science. Advocating carbon change will change the way you live, but will not change future climate. It’s a blatant tax on breathing. To accept the mantra of evil carbon is to invite the death of nationalism to dinner. That’s the thing about history…when you live it, you’re rarely there. Real science is alive and lives in time. It is what it is. Not what it should have been or would have been. It is what it is. So enjoy the journey, because the destination may not be that great. Look at the best educated generation in history… all dressed up with nowhere to go. Superstition is the mantra of the day. Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? Science, that once esteemed bastion of knowledge and fertile pillar to truth, has been neutered into the floppy-dick instrument of global politics and vested activists. Not only does the censorship of science render it impotent, it also looses its ability to objectively inform the public, producing an atmosphere of deafness towards insight and freedoms. What is at risk is not the climate but freedom. Today we live in the most censored of times. Is it not high time we entered a dialogue to awaken an audience to the enveloping clouds of non-news that invade our everyday? “Global warming” is only a vehicle that exemplifies part of the way the system works. It is the insidious procession of the erosion of human rights through the co-verted use of selective censorship, that we should be most interested in. Climate science is in the van-guard of such a procession. The scientific method is not perfect but it does “sophisticate the superstition” and provides a method upon which to gauge progress and proximity of truth. The funnelling of science to deliver a prescribed outcome happens everywhere everyday. In the past, science has arguably aided well for prescribed beneficial outcomes. But the stakes are sky high and connived in the case of global warming. The western world is not going to cripple itself to iron-out injustice. The moral or philosophical question here is, does the end justify the means or the start of a slippery slope? The real question is, what will they pick on next using “science” to substantiate their stance?
Posted by michael haylen, 22/07/2008 11:02:55 PM
John McNamara
John McNamara is Day News Editor at The Canberra Times. Two years working for Labor in oppositon has left him with a warped mind. He was once considered a serious journalist.
The man in white ... Pope Benedict XVI
The man in white ... Pope Benedict XVI

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...