Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Code of silence at the top reveals little has changed 

Code of silence at the top reveals little has changed

DO YOU want to know what is wrong with rugby league and the frustrating issue relating to club attitudes and women? Look firmly across the Tom Uglys Bridge at the besieged and struggling Cronulla Sutherland club.

Three days after his club was dragged through the mud by the raising of sexual misconduct allegations against 11 players, the Cronulla Sutherland chairman, Barry Pierce, finally emerged from his bunker. And what he had to say is hardly an earth-shattering nor a seismic shift in attitude.

This was a club that had more than a quarter of its players and staff in a room watching and participating in group sex with a woman who made a complaint to the New Zealand police.

And what does the genial Pierce, who is so nicely naive he wouldn't have any concept of night-time activities, but who is also on the board of the National Rugby League, have to say about it?

Well, he reckons it wasn't his fault.

At the time the coach Chris Anderson was ill and Pierce's son, Greg Pierce, was the man in charge of the football activities. The younger Pierce went on to become the club's chief executive but has since moved on to another career. The then chief executive Steve Rogers has since passed away.

So chairman Pierce is the obvious man in charge who has the corporate memory of what went on. He wants the players involved to apologise for their actions but, no, he isn't about to name who those players are.

Ahh, the club's protectionist, insular motives come to the fore yet again. It seems not much has changed.

A few appropriate words are uttered: "The Cronulla club looks back on the events of 2002 with a sense of shame and extends its sympathies to the young lady in Christchurch," Pierce said yesterday."I look back now appreciating that more should have been done on our part."

As for his role seven years ago, Pierce reckons he instructed all players and all officials to co-operate fully with the police, adding the rider: "I was not a part of that process."

He doesn't want to unfairly taint innocent parties, saying it would be incredibly damaging to an ex-player or staff member who had nothing to do with the incident to be named. But he reckons he has helped the code change its attitudes towards women, not quite saying it, but inferring that his position on the NRL board has been truly effective.

OK, so if actions speak louder than words, the Cronulla club has certainly made progress in the past seven years. It has sacked Greg Bird, who glassed his girlfriend, and sacked Tevita Latu for headbutting a woman. But surely more progress and openness are still required.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I have concerns now about this football scandal that stories are now suddenly surfacing making all sorts of attacks on the young girl victim of these deviats. Seems curious to me and maybe the work of some footballers management.
Posted by emme, 16/05/2009 12:52:16 AM
these young men, have too much money and too much time on their hands..... I played for years and sure we all had nights of drunken foolery... but any incidents with women were few if at all any.... these incidents disgust me. It is shameful behaviour and shouldnt be tolerated at all. Footballers and their ego's.... it just isnt right
Posted by suzhousid, 17/05/2009 1:57:33 PM
Sexual assault laws in this country are just coming out of the dark ages, yet here we have a scenario with potential to dud us all over again. Why do many think it more plausible that one person might have lied, than that a group of people with a mutual interest in defending their jobs and themselves might have colluded in their story when accused of a crime? That is the bottom line, and women are the losers again in both the legal and PR stakes. Clearly now any woman who gets involved with sportsmen is taking an enormous risk. As in the bad old days, she is once again "asking for it".
Posted by Chris, 18/05/2009 12:45:29 PM
Get rid of the cheerleaders (like Souths did, go Russell Crowe). Because what on earth do nearly-naked women, parading around the stadium and jiggling about as the players run out onto the field, have to do with the actual game? If League wants to show it's not about objectifying women, then turf those cheerleaders!
Posted by Kathryn, 18/05/2009 1:10:49 PM
I agree with Kathryn, and you can throw in the alcohol sponsorships as well, doesn't anyone else see the connection
Posted by Notsurprised, 21/05/2009 12:08:00 PM
Just have a look at the news today. Melbourne lady claims to have had sex with over two hundred, wait for it, AFL PLAYER'S". Over a twelve year period. NOT ONE NRL player involved. Shame ABC shame.
Posted by intouch, 26/05/2009 12:07:07 AM
Another unfortunate fact of our existance is that we only have two sexes. Yes thats right, male and female. So man can only have one choice when it comes to ah,
Posted by intouch, 10/06/2009 2:53:51 PM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

Most popular articles

LJ Hooker CIty



The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...