Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Sexist pigs? 

Sexist pigs?

Imagine spending 10 years and hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to solve a problem only to make it worse, not better. That sounds a bit like marriage doesn’t it? Just kidding! (I hope my wife doesn’t this.) I am talking about the futile attempts of many Australian companies to recruit women into senior roles in business.

I have been working with a client recently trying to address this very issue, and as part of my preparation I did some research to find examples of best practice.

We ended up focusing on 23 global companies which had won awards in the last few years for their women’s initiatives.

What we found shocked me so much that I feel compelled to share it with you.

Of the 23 companies we studied we were only able to find evidence that six of them had made any substantial improvements in the number of women they had in senior roles. And none were Australian.

One European arms of a Big Four accounting firm even went as far to claim credit for 26% of their graduate intake being women. Some further search indicated that 50% of the available talent pool was female. Hardly an achievement worthy of commendation.

And here is the most disturbing part. The six who did were only able to do it with arbitrary quotas and targets. It turns out because we (and I am including women themselves in 'we') have such deep biases that our prejudice is mostly unconscious.

How is it that in 2009 we need to be “forced” to promote women into positions they deserve as much as the men with whom they compete for them?

I need to confess here that I feel like the pot calling the kettle black. In the middle of this research I hosted a lunch for 12 highly successful young entrepreneurs.

Only when we all arrived for lunch did it become evident that I had invited 10 men and one women. And it took the one woman to point that out to me.

Even as I was knee deep in this stuff, my unconscious biases were so strong I failed to take appropriate action.

Consider some of the following things that came out of the research:

• As a general rule senior managers overestimate their “open mindedness” and ability to make non-sexist judgments. It turns out that we are half as open minded and inclusive in their behaviour as they think they are.

• Women are just as capable of discriminating against other women as men are. Some researchers even suggest they are trying to protect their positions as the “only” woman on the board.

• Even when women’s networking groups exist, they are often excluded from the informal networks that count. That is, the networks where the most important decisions get made.

And what makes this most shocking is that ALL of the credible research shows that companies with greater diversity (namely women) in senior roles outperform the market by as much as 33%.

In other words, it is good for business but we don’t change?

Here are some insights from the six that have had progress which you may find interesting:

• Quotas work. As “insulting” as the need for a quota may be for many women, to get results we must forcefully break the biases which keep the status quo entrenched. Insisting that at least one female candidate be in the final three for each appointment and promotion to a senior position.

• Senior leaders are required to find at least 1 female that they will personally mentor and make it their personal responsibility to ensure they progress to the higher ranks.

• Facilitating much more intimate networks to form between aspiring women and senior managers (especially men) is far more powerful than formal women’s networks.

• Unleashing “change agents” with the power to enforce the diversity agenda, who actively seek out insight from women in the business and actively coach them to get on development programs in the like is a powerful initiative.

• Making it customer focused and NOT diversity focused. Just using the word 'diversity' makes people’s eyes glaze over, but when it was framed as enticing more women customers and improving the retention of female clients, the changes were more openly embraced and sustained.

I know I am a little late to weigh in on this issue, and I know I am a man, but when I learned that Australia is regressing, I felt the need to speak up!

I am proud to say since starting the starting this research, I have appointed a female board member and six of my seven new employees are women.

If you are in a position of power in your organisation what are you are doing when it comes to this issue? Do you believe it is a problem?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Peter Sheahan is a recognised authority on global workforce trends, generational change and the impact they have on the way we lead organisations. He uncovered the Generation Y revolution in the workplace with his best seller Generation Y: Thriving (and Surviving) with Generation Y at Work and has written five books. Peter’s latest book Flip shares insights gained from his work inside the boardrooms of some of the world’s most significant companies.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1




comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Look, this is a whole lot of nonsense. Women should be seeking more respect than equality! I find it so irritating that both Men and Women, are always going on about equal this and equal that with both sexes. My opinion is that Men should hold the most senior positions unless a Woman comes along , that is not going to have babies in the midst of it all and then foster them into work etc. Children need their Mums, and if Mum has to work, then do it part-time. We are the carers and nurturers of the family, so stop this equality bit. We are more important that way. You can't run the country on a part-time basis. If a Woman has NO Children, then it's a fair go in Office. I have seen Men be intimidated by a Woman, therefore he could not give his best performance at work. Women tend to cry 'poor me' if they don't get their own way, especially if the kids have disturbed her sleep. Maybe a woman could run the country better, but not with kids hanging onto the apron strings. I'm a practical woman, and don't believe a female should juggle family and work. However, I do believe both parents should work, thus showing a good example to their kids. Respect is what we need MOST!
Posted by Mamamia, 3/09/2009 12:59:52 AM
Most women are best suited to 'recycling data jobs'- repetitious paper movement, 'being nice' to answer the phone. And if compared to ants they work best in a process line, busily stopping- having a chat to the next 'working ant' and then moving on to the next working ant. Such 'gossiping' and 'passing paper' is endless but seems most women suit repetitious boring 'fill-in tasks'. Are men any better? No, they just expect women to be subservient, to 'take messages' and be responsible for 'small tasks'. Yes, it is a Man's pig-headed world' and men do a fine job of self egoing, expect being bowed to and wearing the suits. Women need to prove they are accomplished and many are far more, but too many just want to be 'slotted' into a sub-servient role playing eg even in marriage women expect less, give more, do the cooking, cleaning and running around while 'King' watches football. Time women stood their ground for higher expectations! If he doesn't 'lift his game' then deny him his basic need (if you understand-it's a trade off)
Posted by adaptapensioner.com, 7/09/2009 9:25:10 AM
When is Charlie going to get a crack at the top job, I think his mum doesn't trust him with the Royal jewells.
Posted by intouch, 7/09/2009 11:53:08 AM
Tend to agree with Mamamia - this prompt by the news services to get more funding is just a total waist of ones time - the sad thing is they propose to ask for money to view such content. The sex of a person does not matter - if it does, then your not the right person for that job - I would think that the women these stories described are the type of person who is afraid of drilling holes in their fingers, working, or lifting anything when they can order a male to perform their work. And given the amount of respect shown in such stories I would ask for at least 1000m space to be able to work without sexual harrasment. Regressing is a whole other issue given the Courts, with females in high level jobs are permitted to remove rights from children simply to speed the processes. Yes the Canberra court is run by an Old has been - but given the nature of the entire bench is to aquire money rather then protect an life - it is little wonder children have their rights removed by feminist syndicates who claim to act for the interests of women - when it is more like acting in the interest of media advertisment accounts run by Government ministers looking for a bonus to an allowance
Posted by one, 9/09/2009 3:12:36 AM
Perhaps women are too clever to spend the best hours of the day limited to a routine, and confined within the walls of a stuffy office, year after year. Although I'm highly qualified, I prefer to `sleep in' any day! So please don't equate the 9 to 5 timeslot with employment success. The real success lies with those who work the hours they prefer and with those who have sufficient leisure time to enjoy their lives.
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee, 11/09/2009 8:41:02 PM
Crikey Mamamia, you don't half like to make judgements based on stereotypes! Peter, for what it's worth, I thought your research was revealling and insightful. It must have only been on corporates/commercial entities - the NSW Public Sector has some strategies, but not "affirmative action", IYKWIM. These strategies include having at least one male and one female on an interview panel of three (it's about equal opportunity, not discriminating in favour of women). The public sector union also has specific female reps - or used to. In my public sector workplace, the culture is very corporate/commercial, and yet, more than half the senior execs are women and from memory about half the board members are women. Around half the workforce would be women, too. We have flexible work practices and women very happily return to their positions and do them extremely well - no crying poor in our office. And yet, it was only this week that we hear about a women being prevented access to appropriate breatfeeding facilities, by a female manager no less. But, on the bright side, we have a female GG, elected Qld Premier and boss of a "big four" bank.... Reasons to hope!
Posted by Lexi, 12/09/2009 8:28:43 PM
Women are not men, and should not pretend to be so.
Posted by Jen, 18/09/2009 10:37:14 PM
Long live Our Queen, the first elected Monarch in the whole Commonwealth, Our Australian Head of State, Queen Elizabeth II.
Posted by Jackson, 19/09/2009 12:22:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Dolly Parton in a scene from the movie Nine To Five 1986
Dolly Parton in a scene from the movie Nine To Five 1986

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
University of Canberra - click here
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...