Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Wedded abyss: how to avoid a bitter, lonely marriage. 

Wedded abyss: how to avoid a bitter, lonely marriage.

A HEAVY-SET young man slumps in his chair, looking bored and disengaged, as his wife ticks off a list of complaints about him. In particular he had forgotten a plan to go on a picnic, which was typical of his failure to listen to her.

As the wife whined on, the man's eyes shifted, as if searching for an escape route. But he was trapped in John Gottman's love lab, behind a one-way mirror, being filmed and recorded as part of a 30-year research project. The study has explored what most of us want to know: what distinguishes happy, lasting marriages from those that disintegrate into bitterness or loneliness.

Just over 10 years ago, Dr Gottman published some startling findings of longitudinal research that made him famous. After watching couples interact for a mere 15 minutes in the love lab, he could predict with about 90 per cent accuracy if they would divorce within six years. This week Dr Gottman and his wife and therapist partner, Julie, were in Sydney to run workshops organised by Relationships Australia. "Look for the repair attempt made by the husband and see if she rejects it," he tells the audience of 150 relationship counsellors as the miserable couple loomed into focus on a big screen. "Gottman is the guru of marriage research and counselling," says Anne Hollonds, chief executive of Relationships Australia. "It's like the Pope coming to Sydney."

The former mathematician and rabbi's son from Washington State was the first to apply hard science to the study of marriages, and more recently of gay and lesbian relationships. Some of his findings have been controversial. For example, he found a strong predictor of a happy marriage was a husband's willingness to compromise in marital disputes and accept his wife's influence. It was twisted to imply that only weak men could win in marriage.

But that has not stopped thousands of couples from subjecting themselves to a scientific assessment of their relationship in the love lab or in their homes.

As a couple bats a hard subject back and forth, staff monitor their expressions and body language. Electrodes attached to their bodies measure heart rates and other responses, like the tendency to jiggle with impatience.

Through statistical analysis, Dr Gottman has named what he calls the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse that predict an ailing marriage: criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling and contempt. And the worst of these is contempt.

"You know what it looks like," says Julie, "when you roll your eyes and curl the corner of your lip up. It's a very good indicator a couple will break up."

The couples headed for disaster evince too many of these negatives in dispute. But the masters of matrimony, as the Gottmans call long-term successes, evince a ratio of at least five positive interactions for every negative.

"In a good relationship, people do get angry, but in a very different way," Dr Gottman says. "The masters see a problem a bit like a soccer ball. They kick it around. It's 'our' problem."

They deal with conflict gently and are also more responsive to "sliding door moments" - bids by one partner for an emotional connection. It can be as simple as a husband drawing his wife's attention to the sunset. Does she look up or keep reading her book? Enough positive responses build emotional intimacy.

For the heavy-set man and his whiny wife, the prognosis did not look good. He had thrown out a "repair attempt" - "I'm not remembering things important to you and you're not remembering things important to me," he says. But alas his wife ploughed on with her litany of complaint.

"Every marriage is a mistake," Dr Gottman tells the audience. "The question is what you do with it."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"enough positive responses build emotional inimacy". The problem is to conclude "every marriage is a mistake" is not good relationship observation- at all. A bad choice of words!Most marriages are composed of both sexes incapable of any emotional intimacy. The pre-conceived 'idea' that women are by 'nature' romantic is totally wrong. I have met thousands of females who have no idea about romance, who say the wrong thing just at the right time, put the 'worries of the kids' first before nurturing themselves first, their partners second and then the children. I have met so many women who 'talk shop' all night after the romantic candlenight dinner, the walk on the beach, the sharing of the holiday photos. They are expressive about deep feeling as cut glass in your face. I beated my head against the wall for romance, affection and 'time out' for us for 18.5 years 'within marriage' until she simply admitted "I can't love you the way you want me to". So, the whole family structure just shattered. The essential ingredient was "I'm not capable of loving you". And if you think Dr Phil has a 'good marriage' well that is his second marrige (to Robyn). Read his biography and he has untold references that people who have known him closely say- Phillip has intimacy problems. He himself admits "I have a very hard time in expressing any affection and feeling" And he is OUR expert, Dr Plil McGraw. Most marriages survive because of the shared letterbox, the money invested, the family structure created and expected- and the 'willingness' of the female to 'bung it on' after neither he nor she has any fire to please. Most marriage disintergrates and 'things' are needed, larger mortgages, swimming pools, extensions. Even the late ,great Actor Paul Newman- totally devoted to 'his wife' until death has said publically "I don't even know why we are together, we have nothing in common". So Joanne Woodward-a Pisces- cops it emotionally in public by an Aquarian who depicts her as "why go out and eat hamburgers when you can have steak at home". Please spare me your dirty laundry and hipocracy. Love is an untold knot of deepest mystery that no relationships counsellor can even touch 'the heart'. And more men should never even consider marriage as the level of intimacy is more obstinacy. Selfgratification and a marriage of convenience. When 'love' goes- I leave- that's the criteria. And love is not that 3 letter word. Hurt me emotionally and I will leave. With money or without, I 'give&receive'.
Posted by adaptapensioner.com, 16/05/2009 5:03:37 PM
Another septic who thinks he has all the answers.
Posted by yep, 16/05/2009 8:01:57 PM
Some good research here, but.... "Every marriage is a mistake"?? I don't think so. It's the mindset with which we enter marriage that is the potential mistake. Good strong marriages are the bedrock of society. The key ingredient missing in marriages in today's culture: God. God made marriage, and if God stays at the centre of a couple's marriage, it will be sustained and grow from strength to strength. Sounds foreign, maybe naive, and is a notion often ridiculed in today's culture which has replaced God with false "gods" such as money, material possessions, and lust. But when the real God is placed first, then everything else just works. It's also interesting to note that studies show that couples who sleep together before they are married have something like an 80% increased chance of divorce - a logical outcome given that the original plan for marriage was that we have ONE sexual partner for LIFE, and that sex occurs only within that sacred union, and not before or elsewhere. Wow, revolutionary, but guess what? It works. Take God out of the equation, and you're riding on pure luck. And it seems luck is where we are today - is it one out of two marriages that end in divorce now?
Posted by Lidia, 16/05/2009 9:53:42 PM
Why stop at marriages? Even being born can be a mistake for some people. We have the capacity to make right or wrong decisions about committing to someone, so how we deal with the consequences is anyone's guess! It depends upon a diverse range of circumstances and feelings, including the extent of our love or contempt for people we are close to. We can love someone, yet still dislike many aspects of his/her character. It's more a measure of one's orientation towards one emotion, such as love, and if the love is strong enough to cope with the periods when we feel totally alienated from a person. I don't pretend to know the answers, but I have spoken with friends who have experienced similar situations. Further research into this relationship area might prove to be useful.
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee, 16/05/2009 9:54:41 PM
This is very interesting research. Sit up and take note if you want to improve your life. Better relationship skills can be learned, so why get stuck in a rut repeating the same old destructive interaction patterns day in day out?
Posted by Chris, 18/05/2009 11:44:25 AM
The difficulty in considering the rant of the intellectual, is to accept cheap and purile commentary on the sanctity of Marriage. The dear Doctor, was from a marriage and has dione well from marriage, though, seemingly have a trite opinion on his first bond. Only in America - that is where this drivel ought to be buried, deep under the Holland Tunnel
Posted by Robert, 18/05/2009 12:50:59 PM
One word is the answer people: "communication" God has nothing to do with it, tho his name may be cried out at least once in a while, but hopefully not in vain...
Posted by daneright, 18/05/2009 4:28:54 PM
So because I roll my eyes at my husband when he's being an 'idjit' our marriage is doomed? HA! We still have the ability to make each other laugh, and that is the most important thing in a marriage.
Posted by LackADaisy, 18/05/2009 4:32:27 PM
Which God are you referring to Lidia? The one who Adolf Hitler said "I will always be a catholic" and "I fell to my knee's and thanked the almighty for his providence". or Yahwah who 'told' the Leaders to slaughter every man, woman, child and beast of the cities you kill by the sword or was it the 'adultery commandment' that even extends to not covet "thy neighbour's wife nor his ass nor his oxen". Seems "adultery" has a thread of 'abnormal beast prohibition" written further on. Or the 'Let Us make...' God who thought women 'needed' pain in childbirth as a judgement as 'man' is to "sweat all the days of his sorrow in toil to eat bread". Or the God is Good of the Bali bombers or the righteous killings of Isralites. I refer you to widen the research in "The God Delusion" by Richard Hawkins as the "God" factor is less credible, than in "the love factor" which deludes most sincere adults. I had "God" for 35 years and then divorced, still. (Must have been Gods will)
Posted by adaptapensioner.com, 18/05/2009 5:27:07 PM
All the studies in the world by the experts wont find the answers. Ask the couples with happy, successful marriages that only get better with the passing years. Learn how to laugh and not take things too seriously is the secret to our marriage of 15 years and having a shared sense of humour and sense of fun and lots in common, but time for our own interests. And we dont argue. What is there to argue about?
Posted by Cassie, 18/05/2009 10:21:39 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

Most popular articles

LJ Hooker CIty



The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...