JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Who's taxing who, and who pays the rent?

What is rent? You don't make it past the elementary economics class unless you know that's a trick question. In economics there are two kinds of rent: common or garden rent and ''economic rent''.

Obviously, ordinary rent is what you pay for the use of a building or land. By contrast, economic rent (also called quasi rent) is the amount paid for any ''factor of production'' - land, labour or capital - in excess of the amount it needs to be paid to keep it in its present use (which is its ''opportunity cost'').

The Abbott government's talk of all the damage the mining tax is doing to the economy is tosh. 

If you think you've never heard of economic rent before, you're probably wrong - unless you haven't heard of the minerals resource rent tax or of ''rent-seeking''.

It doesn't get talked about a lot, but economic rent is widespread in every real-world economy, making it something worth talking about. You never know, you may be getting a bit yourself (I'm getting loads).

Economic rent isn't a cost of production that contributes to the selling price of the factor - the land, the physical capital or the labour. Rather, it's earnings to the owner of the factor determined by the selling price. Economic rent is equivalent to ''producer surplus'' in the market for goods and services. When it's received by a business it's also known as ''above-normal profits'' or ''super profits'' (does that term ring a bell?).

Economists define profit differently to accountants. To an accountant, profit is sales revenue minus actual costs. To an economist, costs involve actual costs plus the opportunity cost of the financial capital invested in the business - that is, the most the capital would earn in a different industry with an equivalent degree of risk. (For unincorporated businesses, the opportunity cost also includes the highest wage the proprietor could earn in a different job.)

The opportunity cost of the capital invested in the business is what economists call ''normal profit''. Any actual profit in excess of actual costs plus normal profit is above-normal profit and likely to be the consequence of economic rents.

What is it that allows some factors of production to earn economic rent - higher returns than those needed to keep them in the business? Scarcity or, better, exclusivity. The factor possesses some highly desirable characteristic that means there's not enough of it to go around, so people fight over it and, in the process, bid up its price.

In a textbook economy such a situation wouldn't last long because the market would have an incentive to increase the supply of the desirable factor to meet the high demand. In real-world economies, economic rents can persist because they're not easily replicated. The supply of harbourside land, for instance, is fixed.

The exclusivity of factors may be natural or contrived. Governments often create economic rents by limiting the number of licences they're willing to issue to participants in particular industries - taxi plates, for example.

Patents and copyright are designed to allow creators to enjoy economic rents for a fixed period. This implies monopoly profits are a form of economic rent, although rents can be enjoyed by more than one firm in an industry.

And don't forget many workers benefit from rents. Unions may be able to limit the supply of a particular occupation and so force wages above what they would otherwise be.

In this, however, trade unions are amateurs compared with the colleges of medical specialists.

But some rents aren't contrived. If I were prepared to do my job for $60,000 a year but my boss paid me $100,000, I'd be enjoying economic rent of $40,000 a year. Why would he pay me more than my ''reservation wage''? Because if he didn't a rival employer would.

Of course, the people who do best in the rent stakes are film stars, sports stars and the like. Such people have far more talent than the rest of us, but they also a have a name - are a brand - that attracts more customers than other actors or players do.

The point of all this is that, from a social (community-wide) point of view, economic rent is a waste - a ''dead-weight loss,'' as economists say. It's a price customers pay that does nothing to increase the production of goods and services. If we could eliminate it - say by taxing it away - it wouldn't reduce production, just the incomes of the owners of scarce resources.

This, of course, is the justification for the minerals resource rent tax. There's a lot of economic rent associated with the exploitation of mineral deposits, particularly in Australia, because world reserves of certain minerals are relatively limited and because much of our reserves is high quality and easily won.

Since these resources belong to us, not the mining companies we permit to extract them, we would be mugs not to tax much of that rent rather than letting largely foreign companies walk away with most of it.

I hope by now you understand why the Abbott government's talk of all the damage the mining tax is doing to the economy is tosh, intended to mislead the economically undereducated. (Which is not to say Labor's tax was well designed - it wasn't.)

It's rational for workers to be ''rent-seekers'' in the sense that they equip themselves with scarce skills and work hard at being the best in their field. Similarly, it's rational for firms to seek out niches where prices far exceed costs.

But that's not what the term ''rent-seeker'' - which comes from the libertarian ''public choice theory'' - is usually taken to mean. It refers to groups that lobby the government for tax, spending or regulatory policies that benefit the lobbyists at the expense of taxpayers or consumers, or their rivals.

As The Economist magazine puts it in its business dictionary, it means ''cutting yourself a bigger slice of the cake rather than making the cake bigger''.


  • ""In this, however, trade unions are amateurs compared with the colleges of medical specialists."""

    Thanks...True, very true, really, really, true.....costs a fortune to pay out of pocket costs for xrays, ultrasounds, and specialist visits....

    I think I would liked to add banks in there too for large rent-seekers.

    The money they are getting by being allowed to charge us interest and fees for entering figures into computers is ridiculous.
    And then there is the gambling in the finance industry, .....why should they be able to invent shares and then pass them around making money out of them, and in many cases bleed perfectly good organisations who make products people demand, or sevice communites........ well as spliting them in to pieces and selling bits and pieces off to feed the rent seekers?

    But you are right the miners are causing the most damage I feel, by ripping everything up and polluting, which in rent seeker terms, costs the people and environment lots more than lost money in the's means all future minerals are gone from the ground, so no future generation is going to benefit from Auss minerals....and they will be left with the pollution and environment effects for generations to come.

    No-one knows
    Date and time
    March 01, 2014, 1:36PM
    • Recent US and Australian history proves that this line of argument will never be accepted by neocons who all have an ideological objection to taxation.

      Date and time
      March 01, 2014, 2:11PM
      • The problem with ideologues is they get trapped in a belief without knowing fact from fiction.

        Unfortunately most of those that voted for Abbott believed in his ideology or and worst he couldn't really hurt Australia...the result is we have a government that has no strategy, no plan and no idea ...they have three word slogans and ideology that will destroy Australia's reputation.

        Note the comments from Abbott on the world stage saying no country has or can use debt and deficits to fix its economy (What has US been doing for last 5 years? Its starting to grow and the deficit as a percentage is falling...). Ideologues don't learn.

        Good article and its a pity we haven't learnt the lessons.

        Date and time
        March 01, 2014, 3:25PM
      • Many of the people who voted for Abbott were ignorant, self-centred, xenophobic, misogynistic or racist or a combination of all five and that sadly is too true a picture of twenty first century Australia.

        Date and time
        March 01, 2014, 4:31PM
    • What I don't understand is why is China paying Australia for the natural resources extracted. We all know everything in this land belongs to China, from mining to farms to all real estate; so should Australians pay China instead some kind of rent...? Very soon this shall be addressed...very soon.

      Mr Smith
      New South Wei
      Date and time
      March 01, 2014, 2:12PM
      • Watching the FX markets its almost comical to see the Australian dollar respond to Chinese data more than its own. Currency traders don't care that Australia is experiencing the highest unemployment in a decade... all that matters is that China maintains its GDP.
        If the high AUD could kills the rest of the Australian economy, most of these little traders would just think of Glenn Stevens and laugh as they hit 'buy'.

        Date and time
        March 01, 2014, 2:33PM
    • The fact that I could easily again let the two spare bedrooms in my house tomorrow for $160 a week each on a month to month occupancy basis (no strings attached) which would then mean the whole common rent would be covered and I would even have some left over from economic rent in the second most disadvantaged socio-economic LGA in Melbourne suggests to me that if state governments don't address the dire crisis in the supply of housing soon, well, I don't know, I'm not a prophet but something's got to give.

      Date and time
      March 01, 2014, 2:37PM
      Comments are now closed

      HuffPost Australia

      Follow Us

      Featured advertisers

      Special offers

      Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo

      Executive Style