JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Knives sharpened to cut Google's sandwich

The federal government is determined to collect more tax from global e-commerce companies such as Google and Apple and will use a combination of beefed-up transfer pricing rules along with the launch of a think tank to review the loopholes.

After delivering a blistering speech that fingered Google and its “Double Irish Dutch Sandwich” technique that is designed to pay minimal tax, assistant Treasurer David Bradbury unveiled an exposure draft on transfer pricing.

It follows last week’s release of draft legislation on tax avoidance, which adds to the ATO’s arsenal to plug loopholes and raise more revenue. It comes at a time when the Gillard Government is desperately trying to produce a surplus in the next federal budget.

The crackdown comes as the government struggles to keep a lid on its budget deficit, never mind meet its election promise to be in surplus by 2013.

Australia joins a number of countries, including Britain and China, which are increasingly concerned about the tax leakage from companies such as Amazon, Apple and Google.

It will be interesting to see how the US reacts to the global backlash given some of the money eventually flows back from the tax havens to the mother country.

Bradbury said to help attack the issue he has asked Treasury to develop a scoping paper, to be led by the head of revenue group Rob Heferen.

The discussion paper will set out the risks to the sustainability of Australia’s corporate tax base and look at the potential solutions. The Treasury analysis will be informed by a specialist reference group, made up of representatives from business, tax professionals, academics and the community sector.

The decision to amend transfer pricing and anti-avoidance law under Part IVA will have a profound impact on the ATO's powers, and that of business. Part IVA is the ATO's key weapon for fighting tax avoidance. However, after a string of losses in the courts, the ATO and the government decided that the 31-year-old law needed to be overhauled.
“It is not my usual practice to mention companies by name or to publicly canvass the tax position of particular taxpayers.  Nor is it my normal practice to publicly discuss strategies employed to minimise corporate tax.  However, I will be departing from my usual practice today as I believe there is a strong public interest in drawing attention to practices that have the potential to undermine the future sustainability of Australia’s corporate tax base,” Bradbury said at a conference today.

He said that increasingly, governments were discovering the lack of effectiveness in the digital age of international tax concepts created for the industrial age. “This has been highlighted by the compelling evidence revealed by the UK Public Accounts Committee examination of the Taxation of Multinational Corporations.”

Cranking up the scrutiny on big companies is a vote winner, particularly when it is aimed at companies that pay minimal tax, or whinge about the tax they are paying, such as multinationals engaging in elaborate transfer pricing rackets.

Besides singling out Google, Bradbury cited media reports that Amazon paid no tax in the UK yet made more than £3 billion in sales. It did this through an elaborate “routing” of transactions through Luxembourg, where it faced an effective tax rate of 2.5 per cent.

Draft transfer price reforms are designed to ensure robust transfer pricing rules are in place regardless of whether trade occurs between treaty partners or non-treaty countries. Submissions are open until December 20.

The first stage in the modernisation of transfer pricing rules is to make the tax retrospective to 2004. The next step is to widen the net to include non treaty countries, which should capture some of the activities of the e-commerce companies that use tax havens. It is a complex web but governments in need of revenue will pull out all stops to get back what rightfully belongs to the country.

As Bradbury said: “Many in business reject the notion that paying a fair share of tax forms part of a broader social compact, instead believing that it is just another cost of doing business. On this point, I vehemently disagree. These businesses benefit from operating in an economy built on social and economic institutions — our markets and regulators, the rule of law and our judicial system — not to mention physical infrastructure and human capital that is funded or supported by the taxes paid by others.

"Where some multinational businesses enjoy the benefits of these public goods but refuse to pay their fair share, they are free riding on efforts of others.  Whether it is a domestic company put at a competitive disadvantage because it is paying tax on all of its profits. Or whether it is Australian families that are expected to pay higher taxes or accept fewer government services.

"Losing sight of this perspective risks a community — and consumer — backlash, particularly at a time when the rest of the community is being asked to make sacrifices in the interests of fiscal sustainability.” They are fighting words that will resonate with the community at large.

44 comments so far

  • So these companies engage in tax minimisation which is legal, and then governments complain and want more? Don't they set tax law? I don't think any company would voluntarily pay more tax..the shareholders would have a case to sue!!

    Date and time
    November 22, 2012, 2:22PM
    • C'mon don't trudge out those inane comments. These companies are not paying tax in Australia for revenue that is earned in Australia. Further they are transferring costs to Australian operations that are not duly incurred in Australia. This is entirely done to avoid paying their fair share. If they don't want to pay tax - no problem - there are simple things we can do to ensure Australia gets revenue for use of its resources by foreign owned companies - we can enforce a transactional tax on their websites, We can charge massively increased registration and duties for company owned vehicles etc etc.

      Bottom line - individual taxpaying citizens and Australian businesses should not be subsidising tax avoiders.

      Date and time
      November 22, 2012, 3:00PM
    • If you're not minimising your tax then you need your head read. Quite frankly, I don't think the government knows how to spend it wisely.

      I think some other bloke said something like that

      Date and time
      November 22, 2012, 3:12PM
    • "Bottom line - individual taxpaying citizens and Australian businesses should not be subsidising tax avoiders"

      Hmm, therefore we shouldn't be subsiding general motors to the tune of $90 million annually

      If obama spent all that money to save gm and gm is now solvent, why are we paying them to make:
      a) filthy v8 cars that are fouling the planet and
      b) cars that people don't want?

      # It's not the taxpayers mission to keep a dinosaur corporation alive.

      Date and time
      November 22, 2012, 3:36PM
    • Bender, there's a big difference between minimizing tax obligations and outright avoidance. What the Government is doing is trying to close the loopholes that are being used to avoid paying tax. This is in the best interest of all Australians. How else do you expect the Government to provide infrastructure and services and still not go into debt? You need income in order to cover your expenditure. So does the Government. If the Government doesn't protect it's rightful revenue stream it is mismanaging the country and we are all the poorer for it.

      Good Job
      Date and time
      November 22, 2012, 5:56PM
  • In this time of straightened public finances, I predict much more of this and why not? Whether you're running a business or a PAYG taxpayer, you're being done over. Even the US Government is suffering as Apple etc leave bucket loads of cash in tax havens and then lobby to allow them to repatriate the money at a lower rate. For multinationals I'd like to see the tax go on gross sales rather than profits.

    John Holmes
    Date and time
    November 22, 2012, 2:23PM
    • Perhaps the bite out of the apple logo is quite symbolic!

      Good Logic
      Date and time
      November 22, 2012, 5:46PM
  • You know there is an easy way around this, get rid of all existing taxes, from corporate to PAYG to GST to Excise and replace them all with a flat 20% financial transaction tax.
    This would apply to every electronic transaction in the country.

    Date and time
    November 22, 2012, 2:29PM
    • Simplest solution around for financing society.
      Everyone pays based on a share of their earnings.
      Exempt the basics such as food, or lower the rate on essentials such as power/heat. Other than that, you earn $100K you spend $100K, you pay $20K. You earn $300K you spend $300K you pay $60K.
      Imagine how efficient government would be if this was the (only) means of collecting revenue.
      No tax on importing money, but tax due on exporting, so that companies like this cannot avoid their moral responsibility, namely to pay for the infrastructure and trading environment they depend on in which to make their profit.

      Date and time
      November 22, 2012, 4:06PM
  • No tax on 3 billion in sales?
    One can only boggle at the incompetence of governments that allow this to happen.

    Oh, and do no evil Google.

    Date and time
    November 22, 2012, 2:31PM

    More comments

    Make a comment

    You are logged in as [Logout]

    All information entered below may be published.

    Error: Please enter your screen name.

    Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Please enter your comment.

    Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

    Post to

    You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

    Thank you

    Your comment has been submitted for approval.

    Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

    HuffPost Australia

    Follow Us

    Featured advertisers

    Special offers

    Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo

    Executive Style