The tiny nation of Cyprus was bailed out by its eurozone partners and the IMF this weekend. That much is barely news. The bailout of a country with a broken banking system is now known as a slow Sunday.

But there was something different about Cyprus' bailout that sent shivers through the global banking system.

Deposit holders in Cyprus banks are being forced to pay for part of the deal. The original deal, which looks like it's now being revised, says those with 100,000 euros or more in Cyprus banks will have 9.9 per cent of their deposits levied – or taxed, or confiscated, or whatever you want to call it. Those with less than 100,000 euros will take a 6.75 per cent haircut.

This is rare, if not unprecedented, in modern bank bailouts. Deposit holders have long been considered sacrosanct. A bank's shareholders can lose everything when it screws up. Bondholders can take a hit, too. But deposit holders, particularly small retail deposit holders, are typically untouchable.

Another side to this story

If Cyprus had its own currency, it would be dealing with its economic problems by printing money. That would eventually cause inflation. How much? Let's say 6.75 per cent. In that case, those with cash deposits in Cypriot banks would lose 6.75 per cent of their money in real terms – the same amount being directly confiscated on most deposits through the IMF bailout.

Think of it that way, and Cyprus' bailout fee is only unprecedented in a semantic way. When a government directly takes 6.75 per cent of deposits, people freak out. When the government takes money indirectly through 6.75 per cent inflation, few are concerned.

There are two takeaways from this.

Best of a bad lot

The obvious one is that Cypriots are getting a raw deal – only if you consider the bailout fee in isolation. Compared with what would have likely occurred without a bailout, it isn't bad at all. Most estimates I've seen of what would happen if Cyprus were forced to leave the euro and return to its old currency predict a devaluation of 40 per cent to 60 per cent. The country was in a terrible position with no easy solutions. It took the least bad option.

The other takeaway is that when it comes to cash, the difference between inflation and a direct levy is minimal.

Most don't think of inflation as a fee because they don't see money being directly removed from their bank accounts. But the effect on wealth is the same in the end. While depositors might rarely (if ever) lose money from bank deposits the way Cyprus is proposing, an untold amount of deposit wealth has been lost to inflation.

There will always be inflation, and dealing with it is more useful than grumbling about it. There are plenty of options to invest money at rates of return above inflation.

Charlie Munger once said: "I remember the $0.05 hamburger and a $0.40-per-hour minimum wage, so I've seen a tremendous amount of inflation in my lifetime. Did it ruin the investment climate? I think not."

Foolish takeaway

The problem is that so many investors have willingly made themselves subject to inflation's mercy, ploughing into cash and bonds that yield little more than inflation. They are subjecting themselves to their own mini-Cyprus bailout fee year after year.

What's unfortunate is that they may not even know it. Cypriots are well aware of their fee. They see the headlines. They'll see the withdrawals. Money here today will be gone tomorrow. Other people around the world who invest in the comfort of cash and bonds yielding very little, I'm afraid, are much less aware.

Attention: If you're looking for quality shares that have been selected based on quality and strong dividends, Foolish, dividend-loving investors and BusinessDay readers alike can click here.

Click here to request a Motley Fool free report entitled "Secure Your Future with 3 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks".

Morgan Housel is a Motley Fool contributor. You can follow The Motley Fool on Twitter @TheMotleyFoolAu. The Motley Fool's purpose is to educate, amuse and enrich investors. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691).

Authorised by Bruce Jackson.