The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Trailer
A curious Hobbit, Bilbo Baggins, journeys to the Lonely Mountain with a vigorous group of Dwarves to reclaim a treasure stolen from them by the dragon Smaug.PT2M26S http://www.canberratimes.com.au/action/externalEmbeddedPlayer?id=d-267za 620 349 September 20, 2012
"In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means comfort."
- Opening lines of JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit
For Lord of the Rings fans, Elvish is almost back in the building!
Heading to New Zealand for the premiere of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, there are excellent reasons to be optimistic about Peter Jackson's return to the world of hobbits, dwarves, wizards and dragons.
First, of course, is Peter Jackson. Despite an earlier plan for Guillermo del Toro to direct two Hobbit movies (with Jackson producing and co-writing the script), no filmmaker could have a better feel for Middle Earth and its characters.
And now that he's drawing on Tolkien's notes for a planned revision and making three movies, few directors in cinema history have shown they can maintain such high storytelling standards over a trilogy.
There are other reasons to feel encouraged:
• Structurally, Tolkien's relatively slim novel tells of a quest by Bilbo Baggins and 13 dwarves to seize treasure guarded by the fearsome dragon Smaug. While it is episodic, Bilbo's growing confidence and his bonding with the dwarves seem readymade for a screen version.
• While Jackson says An Unexpected Journey has a running time of 160 minutes - substantial, but less than the 178, 179 and 201 minutes of The Lord of the Rings movies - he insists there is enough story for another trilogy. Given his pacing of the earlier trilogy was as near perfect as his control of tone and melding of human emotion with epic scale, that's good enough for me.
• Also heading back to Middle Earth is the behind-the-scenes team that won 17 Oscars and many of the key cast, including Ian McKellen as Gandalf, Andy Serkis as Gollum, Cate Blanchett as Galadriel and Hugo Weaving as Elrond. Amid all the acclaim, the strength of the performances was an under-appreciated aspect of The Lord of the Rings, as shown by only one of the trilogy's 30 Oscar nominations going to one of the actors - McKellen for The Fellowship of the Ring.
• English actor Martin Freeman (The Office, Love Actually, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and Sherlock) seems almost ideal to play Bilbo Baggins, with his Hobbitish looks and ability to play comedy with heart.
I can think of only three reasons to be not quite so confident:
• Lightning strikes rarely for even the best filmmakers. Considering all the obstacles that Jackson had to overcome on The Lord of the Rings - starting when Harvey Weinstein wanted to replace him with Shakespeare in Love's John Madden if he refused to make just one movie instead of two - its success was nothing short of phenomenal. Could a second trilogy work so well again? Precious few filmmakers have had anywhere near the same success when they return later to familiar territory, including Francis Ford Coppola with The Godfather: Part III, George Lucas with Star Wars - Episode 1: The Phantom Menace and, more recently, Ridley Scott with Prometheus.
SPOILER ALERT: The following paragraph contains a spoiler for people who have not read The Hobbit. Skip the next paragraph if you want to avoid the spoiler.
• There is a dramatic problem with the climax to the novel. When Bilbo and the dwarves finally confront Smaug, Tolkien has the dragon killed by a secondary character elsewhere, although only after Bilbo has identified its weakness. Dramatically, it's like having a guest character solve the crime in a CSI episode rather than one of your key cast. But it will be two movies before we know how they deal with the issue.
• Warner Bros is requiring critics to hold back on reviews until after the US premiere on December 3. The logic is that it allows reviews to run closer to the movie's US release on December 14; in Australia, it's out on December 26. In many ways, that's perfectly reasonable given the way social media amplifies extreme early reviews over the more considered words of valued critics. But there are cases - yes, difficult to believe - when an embargo is just to postpone the news that a movie hasn't worked.
No matter. We'll know soon enough. Now onto Middle Earth ...
What aspect of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey are you most looking forward to? What concerns do you have about the film adaptation? Leave a comment below.