JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Weigh in

Make love, not war.

Make love, not war.

So, thanks to my somewhat pathetic, pleading blog post last month "Give me a TV show", I've hooked up with a production
company called R & R Media and we're going to shoot a "sizzle reel" for All Men Are Liars TV ...

What we intend to do is film a version of what will be a panel show - obviously with a series of guests - concentrating on 10 knotty questions about men and women.

The actual show will focus on a single topic but we'd like to showcase a breadth of subjects - and reflect the concerns of well ... you.

Below, I've listed some of the topics that jump out at me as "no-brainers" for discussion, but I'm sure y'all will have some thoughts of your own and we'd love to hear them.

Here goes ...

Who's really got the power? Feminism versus the patriarchy. 

The life of the average man is fairly depressing, some would argue, yet blokes are told they hold all the power in society. Why then are men considered so expendable, being continually sent off to die in war and our most dangerous industries?

Let us ponder what kind of power it is that bestows on men a 10-year-shorter life span than women and a higher incidence of disease, crime, alcoholism and drug addiction? What kind of power is it that blesses men with a self-destructive need to achieve and the duty to spend a lifetime supporting others, more often than not in an unsatisfying job?

It's easy to forget that, for men, inequality is often an end point, but for every woman it's where she begins life. Gender inequality is not limited to just one issue, one culture or one religion; it's the bass line of human dynamics.

Some argue the need for universal gender equality outstrips every other pressing world issue, including global warming and environmental degradation, overpopulation, Third World debt, poverty and disease. Indeed many say that if women's rights were addressed we'd go a long way towards solving many of these problems.

So who actually holds the power in society today and is it changing? Does the "patriarchy" of feminist theory even exist? And, with Western women flooding into the media and government, is it time they take equal responsibility for gender stereotypes, continued inequity and the lapsed feminist ideals of young females?

Is monogamy a natural state? Is it possible for the average woman or man, short of chemical castration or a chastity belt, to stay faithful to one person for life?

People who answer "yes", "unquestionably" or "without a doubt" are invariably in their 20s, 30s or 40s - the relationship equivalent of doomed adventure tourists doing karate kicks to warm up in Everest base camp.

We've heard all the theories; about monogamy being an unnatural state, that men are "meant" to spread their seed and we can even cite the cultures in which mistresses are widely accepted.

But is it just rationalising immorality? Why are men so quick to roll out the "evolutionary" compulsions for multiple sexual partners, yet they manage not to spear their neighbours or shit in the street like the cavemen they claim still to be?

Does monogamy really provide the necessary stability to bring up healthy children? Are women truly more monogamous than men? And is the secret to resisting temptation as simple as "not looking?"

Are you a misogynist? Do Aussie men actually like women? We live in a culture with a stringent demarcation between the sexes, whereby too many males struggle to relate to women as anything other than what the novel Puberty Blues described as a "piece of meat with a hole in it".

Why do Australian men so dislike hanging out with their women? Are the high-profile excesses of our football fraternities just an extension of a more pervasive misogyny? And are Aussie men all that bad when compared with the cultures of the Middle East, Asia and Europe?

Nowadays it seems the label of "misogynist" is often misused to silence reasonable criticism of women, or to describe attitudes that are merely sexist. Is it a reflection of society that the term "misogyny" is largely understood but "misandry" is not?

Do women's magazines promote an anti-man stance? Are women the worst misogynists of all? Are lads' magazines and TV programs such as The Footy Show a bit of fun or a bleak blueprint for the young misogynist? Can or will misogyny and misandry ever disappear? How do you challenge your peers' attitudes without losing your friends?

Kids: Selfless or selfish? Parents talk up the experience of child-rearing as if they're Easter Show urgers, saying "it changes your life!", "you don't know what love is until you have a child!!" or "it's the best thing I've ever done!!!"

Scattered among those exclamation marks, however, will be a person who'll occasionally admit "if I'd known what it was going to be like, I probably wouldn't have done it" or "I'm really struggling. I want my old life back."

What do you do if "the greatest day of your life" is actually the very worst? What are the options when you suddenly realise that little bundle of joy is actually a dreadful mistake you can never undo?

Critics will say "pull your head in", "parenting is about self-sacrifice" and "don't be so self-absorbed", which is funny when you consider that, in 2050, the projected world population is going to be 10 billion, more than double the number in 1984.

And you think it's hard to find childcare now?

Self-absorption is defined as "preoccupation with oneself, especially to the exclusion of others", which sounds like a mighty fine description for people who mindlessly shoot out offspring, ignoring the fact their little darlings are part of the biggest environmental problem facing our planet today.

Consolations for a broken heart: "One of the most profound mysteries of love is 'why him?' and 'why her?'" writes author Alain de Botton.

Why of all the possible candidates did our desire settle on this person and how did we come to treasure them above all others when their conversation is so dull and their personal habits so unappealing?

We've all asked ourselves this question and it comes into stark relief when a relationship ends. "What's wrong with me?" "Why aren't I good enough?" "Will I ever be happy?"

Every year science sheds more light on the compulsion to love, with some anthropologists now arguing it is a drive, no different from hunger or thirst, ensuring we search for (and hopefully find) the ideal co-parent to produce healthy children.

Is it as simple as this? Everyone endeavours to eliminate through the other individual their own weaknesses, defects and deviations lest they be perpetuated in our kids.

Perhaps the broken hearted can now take consolation from being dumped. "There is nothing wrong with us per se," writes de Botton, "our characters are not repellent, nor our faces abhorrent. The union collapsed because we were unfit to produce a balanced child with one particular person. The break-up was not their choice."

I'd wager that's small satisfaction if you're getting divorced and already have kids, though.

Jealousy, rejection and violence: The evolutionary compulsion behind most human emotions, be they anger, love, sadness, disgust or curiosity is pretty clear, but can you name a single good reason why jealousy exists, except to stuff up relationships?

How much jealousy is enough? Where does it come from? When does it veer into obsessiveness? Why does it end in violence so often and what can we do to combat it in ourselves and discourage it in our partners?

"If a man wants a woman who doesn't want him, he cannot win," says David Deida in his book The Way of the Superior Man.

It's the same for both sexes; unfortunately too many men are unwilling to deal with emotional pain caused by jealousy and rejection and try to enforce their will on women through violence, or turn to drugs and alcohol to escape it.

What do you do when someone doesn't want you? How do you reject a person without humiliating them? And what are the warning signs that a relationship has gone seriously wrong and you need to get out?

Madonna/whore syndrome v bad boy and SNAG: It's said women have two lists of attributes for men – one for when they're younger and looking for fun, and another for when they want to settle down and have children.

Why do so many women want to shag a bad boy, yet marry a Sensitive New Age Guy (SNAG) - and how is this confusing young men looking for their masculine identity?

Men's lists of attributes for women are no less contradictory. Many want a woman who'll act one way with them but not the rest of the world, who'll be the cliched "whore in the bedroom" and Madonna outside.

Are these tired generalisations and are they perpetuated by sexist socialisation? Is the new generation of sexually empowered young women forcing men into a more feminised role? And how can we expect men to treat women with respect when so many girls are hypnotically drawn to guys who treat them like shit?

Prostitutes and diamond rings: When I wrote an opinion piece in 2007 for The Sydney Morning Herald about visiting a prostitute it became the most read articles on Fairfax Media websites for the month.

The question I posed was a simple one: is it more morally correct to use a sex worker than to lie about your feelings to get a woman in bed?

More than 30 per cent of men admit to having visited prostitutes, yet we disdain these women above any other, perhaps because their trade strips bare the dynamics of the sexual contract.

The original marketing campaign for diamond engagement rings devised by De Beers is embedded in the male psyche because it ingeniously played on men's complexes about love, status and money: "If you don't buy her a diamond, you can't afford her."

So how does giving a woman a diamond engagement ring differ from paying a strange woman for sex? Is the ingrained custom of a man paying for his date also not prostitution of another stripe? Does the trade serve a purpose in sexless marriages and where do the unloved, the ugly and the disabled go for intimacy if not a prostitute?

Size matters: Men's dicks and women's breasts: It's one of our most enduring questions, one that men and women of all shapes, colours and creeds have asked themselves at one time or another: are they big enough?

Thanks to advertising campaigns, men's magazines, pornography and women's fashion it's now perfectly acceptable to use the proportions of penises and breasts to judge our own gender and belittle the opposite sex.

Flat-chested women are mocked as "masculine", while men with small penises are rebuffed as "not man enough". This has led to breast enlargement transforming from being a jaw-dropping obscenity just 40 years ago to a socially acceptable 21st-birthday gift for girls.

The cosmetic and plastic surgery industries have learnt their lesson well: "Make women hate their bodies and they'll buy stuff". So now it's the men's turn as they're bombarded with pills and ointments and surgeries to enlarge their dicks ... to make them "complete".

So does having a small penis or breasts affect how people live their lives? Has their size helped form their personality and the way they interact with peers, work colleagues, lovers and the opposite sex?

What do men really think of small breasts and what do women think of guys with little penises? What's it like to be rejected for an appendage and how do we move beyond the static of unrealistic expectations to see people as individuals, not just suits made of skin?

The games we play: How many times have you heard someone say "I just wish guys would be honest" or, "Why can't she say what's on her mind?" or "I'm so sick of playing games".

Why then does nothing scare off a potential mate quicker than plain old honest vulnerability? If you want to be a winner in the dating game, it seems you must hold your cards close to your chest, never letting the other know just how you feel.

But then what?

Is game playing necessary and who plays with the other sex's mind the most – men or women? What are the games each gender indulges in? Do we bring them on ourselves through jealousy and nagging? Are they a means of self-preservation, a shock-absorber for rejection?

Cheat within the sheets:  Is there a better feeling than cheating on your partner; having mad sex with a nubile stranger, then sliding into bed beside your snoring other half knowing you've got away with it?

When you've got a spouse, a brood of kids and the possibility of losing half of everything you own, including custody of your children, the sheer wild, stupid danger of infidelity must be nature's most potent aphrodisiac, because why else do it?

We've discussed monogamy, now let's look at its ugly cousin: infidelity. Why do men and women risk careers, financial ruin and social ostracism to cheat on their partners?

If you don't know, does it hurt you? Can a little bit on the side ever do a relationship good by reminding you what you have at home? And is it possible that infidelity and promiscuity is actually good for the species?

Are successful and financially independent women cheating on their partners more than their male counterparts? Does this mean women are just as promiscuous?

More to the point, how do you know if someone's cheating on you and, if you're the one doing it, how do you get away with it?

Feel free to offer your own topics.

SYDNEY WRITER'S FESTIVAL

I'll be talking with Alex Mitchell, author of Come The Revolution: A memoir and Kevin Rudd's former head of spin, Lachlan Harris, this Friday, May 18, 2012, at the Philharmonia Studio, Pier 4/5, Hickson Road, Walsh Bay from 1pm to 2pm. It's free. For more info, go here.

Sam de Brito's latest novel Hello Darkness is in bookstores now. You can follow him on Twitter here. His email address is here.

85 comments so far

  • " Let us ponder what kind of power it is that bestows on men a 10-year-shorter life span than women and a higher incidence of disease, crime, alcoholism and drug addiction?"

    Many men don’t make wise and/or timely decisions about their health, well-being, or safety, to the same degree that women do. I don’t understand why, though. Women are encouraged to care about these things more than men, because women are the child-bearers. And there’s more money to be made by the media by exploiting women’s health concerns, so men’s health problems are overlooked.

    Men still DO have the power to make healthy decisions; but if they don’t WANT to, that’s their own responsibility.

    Commenter
    The evil twin
    Date and time
    May 15, 2012, 8:55PM
    • What happened to "drug and alcohol abuse, depression, misogyny, social isolation, materialism and unrealistic expectations"? I'd watch a show on one of those topics, especially one that let people have their say, rather than playing for the headline grab. The list in the post above will be one of the 9-out-of-10 superficial news items on the topic of the hour. Please tell me this isn't you, Sam, because it's all a bit too Cleo/Current Affair/NotW/Women'sDay/HomeAndAway: heck, even the Wheeler Centre is in the midst of about five of these topics all at once, thanks to Bettina Ardnt;

      Who's really got the power?
      Is monogamy a natural state?
      Are you a misogynist?
      Kids: Selfless or selfish?
      Consolations for a broken heart:
      Jealousy, rejection and violence:
      Madonna/whore syndrome v bad boy and SNAG:
      Prostitutes and diamond rings:
      Size matters: Men's dicks and women's breasts:
      The games we play
      Cheat within the sheets:

      There are 77 question marks on this page. For all the banter I've enjoyed watching, I've been here all these years because I'm interested in what you think. Not always in agreeance, but interested.

      Commenter
      let sam be sam
      Date and time
      May 15, 2012, 10:18PM
      • I think you've just about covered it. The real trick will be to get new and interesting comments on these topics rather than the worn out, stupifying shite that normally gets trotted out.

        Commenter
        JEQP
        Date and time
        May 16, 2012, 12:45AM
        • So true. These topics have been discussed, blogged and explored endlessly... boring.

          I'd like to see some discussion about fantasies, fetishes, exploring sexuality and swinging/swapping. Those would be much more interesting and revealing topics.

          Commenter
          http://diaryofasexjunkie.wordpress.com/
          Location
          Cyberspace
          Date and time
          May 16, 2012, 11:11AM
      • You beauty, gives me a reason to turn on the TV.

        Are issues between men and women due to the fact that these days many women behave like men and many men behave like women ? Is this change in behaviour due to the brainwashing effects of TV, porn, advertising and popular culture ?

        If you're going to cheat, make it casual and avoid affairs.

        Commenter
        kermit the log
        Location
        sydney
        Date and time
        May 16, 2012, 1:24AM
        • Sam states:

          "When you've got a spouse, a brood of kids and the possibility of losing half of everything you own"

          Are you implying the male owns everything and a divorce leaves you with half? (exceedingly optimistic BTW)

          Or do you mean 1/2 of a 1/2 leaving you a 1/4? (which is probably closer to the mark)

          Commenter
          Akbers
          Location
          Sydney
          Date and time
          May 16, 2012, 7:41AM
          • A quarter! I got zilch and the kids. Go figure. I never understand folk who claim that it is half of accrued value of relationship. It as much as some slimy solicitor can get for himself ...the parties get left overs. But really, I lucked out as I've brought up the kids and they haven't complained about the lifestyle we've live.

            Commenter
            Fluellen
            Date and time
            May 16, 2012, 5:57PM
        • Sounds like a male version of The Circle. Not really compelling viewing because it's just going to be the usual talking heads from the usual PC drivel that always gets trotted out on TV in this situation.

          You could do this in a serialised TV show with a story and a protagonist. Exploring these themes that way would make for more interesting viewing.

          Commenter
          Bender
          Date and time
          May 16, 2012, 7:57AM
          • The big issues?
            -Who holds the remote control, and, does that person have permission to 'flick'?
            -Are you allowed to leave your partner if they continually don't put the lid back on the toothpaste?
            -Is it really gay, if it happens in prison?
            -When does a look become a perve?
            -Is it ok to pick your nose in front of your kids?
            -Is it ok to pick your nose in front of your parents?
            -Is it ok for your parents to pick their nose in front of your kids?
            -You can pick your friends. You can pick your nose. But can you pick your friends nose?
            Enough about noses.

            Other big issues is:
            -Who do you actually have to stand up for on public transport? Is a general rule 'if you look as old, or older then my mum, I will stand up for you?'
            -Do good looking people get away with a whole lot more?

            Thought provoking blog, Sam!

            Commenter
            brissy_pete
            Date and time
            May 16, 2012, 8:21AM
            • brissy ... your a bloke ... we should stand up for everyone else, even school kids struggling with bags.

              Commenter
              Fluellen
              Date and time
              May 16, 2012, 6:15PM

          More comments

          Make a comment

          You are logged in as [Logout]

          All information entered below may be published.

          Error: Please enter your screen name.

          Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

          Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

          Error: Please enter your comment.

          Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

          Post to

          You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

          Thank you

          Your comment has been submitted for approval.

          Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

          Executive Style newsletter signup

          Executive Style newsletter signup The latest news delivered to your inbox twice-weekly.

          Sign up now