JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Most troops home by next year's end

Date

Michelle Grattan

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Gillard spells out Afghanistan exit plan

The bulk of Australian troops could be home from Afghanistan within 18 months.

PT0M0S 620 349

PRIME Minister Julia Gillard today will flag Australia's troops are set to start handing control to Afghan security forces in Oruzgan within months, with most of our soldiers returning home by the end of next year.

As she stares down critics - including a former senior officer who commanded the troops - Ms Gillard will insist that ''this is a war with a purpose''.

But last night retired Major-General John Cantwell, who commanded Australia's forces in Afghanistan in 2010, declared that ''at the human level'' the commitment was not worth it.

Australian soldiers on patrol in Afghanistan.

Australian soldiers on patrol in Afghanistan.

Against the background of new bloody attacks by the Taliban in Kabul, Ms Gillard will spell out the timetable for cutting back Australia's combat role, reassuring the public that ''this is a war with an end''. By the end of next year, Australia will no longer be conducting routine frontline operations with the Afghan forces. Some special forces would be among the Australian troops that remained.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai will soon announce the transition details in Oruzgan, where Australian troops are concentrated. It will take 12-18 months. After that, the majority of Australia's troops will have returned home, Ms Gillard will say in a speech to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. She plans to tell the May NATO summit in Chicago, which will discuss Afghanistan that Australia will stump up for long-term security aid for the country. ''I will use the opportunity … to announce the details of increased Australian development assistance to Afghanistan through to 2015-16'' and beyond.

She and President Karzai will sign an agreement for an ''enduring partnership'' covering development, security, trade and cultural links.

The weekend's renewed insurgent attacks in Kabul ''remind us that as the insurgency comes under greater sustained pressure in the field, the prospect of high-profile attacks aimed at disproportionate global public impact remains''.

But she will also point out that these attacks were successfully countered by the Afghan security forces.

Major-General Cantwell told the ABC's Four Corners that as a commander he asked himself many times ''is it worth it?''

''The only way I can see through this, so that I can sleep at night, is to differentiate. You could never look at any soldier, sailor or airman and say, your life's forfeit, for some political purpose. That's …unacceptable. But at the highest level of strategy, and in the dirty ugly world of international relationships, where 'it's you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours' that those lives become less important, and taking that … hardnosed, realpolitik view, that politicians do, and must, it's worth it. But not at the human level.''

Opposition leader Tony Abbott said that ''we all want our troops to come home as soon as possible'', but that it was important the mission was fulfilled before any withdraw began.

Mr Abbott - who has toured Afghanistan twice - gave his cautious support to Ms Gillard's expected announcement, saying that ''there was no reason to suspect the job could be finished earlier than later''.

Shadow attorney-general George Brandis said it was ''shameful'' if the decision to withdraw troops had been made for political purposes.

''It would be a shameful thing if ... this mission was foreshortened for reasons of domestic political convenience for the Australian Labor Party rather than on the basis of the military commanders in the field,'' Senator Brandis said today.

''Having said that, we will listen to what the Prime Minister has to say and address the situation again no doubt later in the day.''

With Jessica Wright

48 comments

  • Lives for votes! While I agree with the decision, this is not about the reasons we are there or the responsabilities that go with being there. It is purely a desparate grab for votes in an election year

    Commenter
    dazza
    Location
    Richmond
    Date and time
    April 17, 2012, 7:21AM
    • Oh, cut out the carping!! The PM made a good decision. Can we not leave it at that?

      Aren't you people sick of the constant whining and cheap shots? I sure am.

      Commenter
      Bug
      Location
      Melbourne
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 9:32AM
    • Wouldn't matter to you Dazza what Julia Gillard says, you would think up something nasty to say about her, did you complain when John Howard sent the troops into Afghanistan and Iraq, seems the Coalition sends in the troops without thought and then ALP have to bring them out, eg Vietnam, Iraq and now Afghanistan!

      Commenter
      M
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 10:23AM
    • M, you've bought into the populist nonsense that the "ALP" (i.e. the Whitlam government) withdrew Australian Forces from Vietnam. By the time Mr Whitlam was elected, there was just a small training team plus embassy guards left "in country". His government did indeed withdraw them, leaving long standing allies in the lurch. I'm hoping that the same doesn't happen this time.

      Commenter
      Andy Evans
      Location
      Little River
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 10:43AM
    • Andy Evans, I don't buy into populous nonsense, I look at the facts and it is garbage what you said about "leaving allies" in a lurch, so what do you suggest we do in Afghanistan? Stay until when?

      Commenter
      M
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 12:08PM
    • M, if you think you're across the "facts" then I suggest that you read Paul Ham's excellent Vietnam history before you comment further.

      Commenter
      Andy Evans
      Location
      Little River
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 1:20PM
    • Poor Andy, see you have been very busy this morning with your various comments, Have you been to Vietnam and talked to the people there? I have

      Commenter
      M
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 1:51PM
    • The biggest threat to Australia's security may be our alliance with the USA. If we hadn't supported the US invasion of Afghanistan, do you think we'd have been targeted in the Bali bombings? I doubt it. We ought to get out of Afghanistan fast and start thinking for ourselves. The US is an empire in rapid decline.

      Commenter
      SteveM
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 2:50PM
  • Sorry dont trust a word that comes from her mouth

    Commenter
    paulk
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    April 17, 2012, 8:01AM
    • Sorry dont trust a word that comes out of your mouth.

      Commenter
      zacca
      Location
      adelaide
      Date and time
      April 17, 2012, 11:53AM

More comments

Comments are now closed

Related Coverage

Featured advertisers

Special offers

Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo