JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Roxon's calls on Slipper's crudities show questionable judgment

Peter Slipper ... resigned as speaker of the house.

Peter Slipper ... resigned as speaker of the house. Photo: Andrew Meares

Test: how long does it take to deduce whether the following text messages are sexual and in poor taste?

''Did you lose your maidenhood again?''

Roxon also said something that was untrue: ''We aren't bringing a strike-out application; Mr Slipper is.''  

''Your virtual hymen.''

''We say a person is a c**t when many guys like c**ts!''

''They look like a mussel removed from its shell. Look at a bottle of mussel meat!''

It takes about eight seconds to read these messages. Confronted with dozens of similar messages it would have taken less than a minute to realise that the former speaker of the house, Peter Slipper, sent numerous lurid, unsolicited sexual messages to a staff member. Which means the Attorney-General, Nicola Roxon, has a problem.

On Tuesday night, it emerged during a Senate estimates hearing that the Attorney-General was briefed on June 9 about the hundreds of dubious or distasteful text messages sent by Slipper to his staffer James Ashby.

Four days later, on June 13, Roxon instructed the Solicitor-General to seek to have Ashby's case struck out. She also gave instructions to seek a waiver for the government to be allowed to use the texts to have Ashby sacked.

Also on June 13, in a further attempt to shut down the case, the government offered to pay damages to Ashby to settle his sexual harassment claim.

Two days later, despite her knowledge of the scale and nature of the texts sent by Slipper, the Attorney-General held a press conference and said this: ''The Commonwealth strongly believes that this process has been one which is really for an ulterior purpose … the Commonwealth has obtained a vast amount of material … It will be clearly shown … that there were in fact clear intentions to harm Mr Slipper and to bring his reputation into disrepute and to assist his political opponents and that was the purpose for the bringing of this claim.''

The political mischief in this case has never been in doubt. What was misleading about the Attorney-General's statement was that the ''vast amount of material'' was not merely vexatious. It buttressed a sexual harassment claim. It was also political dynamite.

Roxon also said something that was untrue: ''We aren't bringing a strike-out application; Mr Slipper is.''

The shadow attorney-general, Senator George Brandis, told me yesterday: ''These texts, on any view, contain dozens of instances of predatory sexual conduct. So the Attorney-General's claim that this was merely a vexatious case was extraordinary. Any person who read the texts would know instantly that Ashby had a case.

''Yet she gave instructions to strike Ashby's case out. She gave a press conference in which she described the action as vexatious. It meant that everything she has subsequently said about Alan Jones and Tony Abbott being misogynists was said with the full knowledge that the government was protecting a real misogynist, Peter Slipper.''

It also emerged during the estimates hearing that the government deployed 17 solicitors and two barristers on this case, which explains why it cost the government $730,000, plus $50,000 in damages paid to Ashby in damages.

''Even a major case involving the Commonwealth would normally only require three or four government solicitors,'' Brandis said. ''So the resources used here were extraordinary.''

The Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, Senator Eric Abetz, was even blunter. He told me: ''The government was willing to spend three quarters of a million dollars of taxpayers' money to try to cover this up. I've never seen the first law officer of the land behave in such a partisan way. She has a lot to answer for and a lot to explain.''

During question time last Thursday, Julie Bishop asked the Attorney-General: ''When did the Attorney-General or her office first become aware of the content of the offensive SMS messages?'' Roxon declined to answer: ''I am really not able to go into each stage of the legal advice that we have been provided with at different times. It is before the court.''

Bishop then asked: ''How can the Attorney-General refute the obvious conclusion that the government settled the case with Mr Ashby in order to suppress the public release of the offensive SMS messages?''

Roxon: ''Clearly, if that was the intention, it did not work. The one reason you can be sure that it was not the intention is that it did not work … I do not think it is appropriate for us to speculate about what might happen in that matter that is still ongoing.''

The speculation is over. The Attorney-General finds herself on a slippery slope.

Twitter: @Paul_Sheehan_

Follow the National Times on Twitter

 

370 comments

  • The A-G is a fine woman, and a fine Labor woman. She never speaks ill of anyone, and is a model of class and sophistication in the chamber. She calls out sexists and homophobes regulalry, and is completely consistent in what she says. She displays intelligence of a grand degree, far more than any horrible Liberal. As a Labor man, I urge us all to get behind her, as she is doing a sterling job. It is my important view, and speaking on behalf of all good social democrats, that we should not question her in this way, and rather, focus ALL of our collective attention of the rabid Abbott.

    Commenter
    Evan
    Location
    Pymble
    Date and time
    October 18, 2012, 8:01AM
    • You're absolutely right Evan, senior members of the government shouldn't be held to account for anything....

      Commenter
      Jimc
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:19AM
    • Wait on Evan - is this the same Roxon who was forced to apologise to the court for letting Slipper in the back door of the court where she provided him access, to avoid media scrutiny (she has an office in the building).

      Are you talking about the same person that despite her intimate knowledge of the Slipper case, acted as judge and jury in declaring Abbott guilty of misogyny, which was a ridiculous assessment as most people agree.

      Roxon's lack of judgement has been extraordinary, and she has no excuse.

      Commenter
      Hacka
      Location
      Canberra
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:25AM
    • And through my rose coloured glasses I can see the Easter Bunny the Tooth Fairy OHHH hooray there's Santa Class
      Are you for real or just taking the P..s?

      Commenter
      19Binda
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:27AM
    • Particularly if she is a woman.

      Commenter
      mayday
      Location
      sydney
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:30AM
    • I take it that was sarcasm but can't be sure? Had to be.

      Commenter
      Sticks
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:31AM
    • I still find it amazing that the first law officer of this country has just 4 years work as a lawyer (2 years as an associate to a high court justice and 2 years as a lawyer in a law firm). I think this complete lack of experience is probalaly the main reason Roxon keeps on making mistakes, as a lawyer you need at least 6 years of experience to be good at your job. To those bagging Brandis, he has 27 years as a barrister, of which he has been senior counsel for 7 years. Hahaha Brandis has actually been senior counsel longer then roxon worked as a lawyer.

      Commenter
      Greg
      Location
      Here and There
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:32AM
    • Evan, you're joking I'm sure, if not then who was that Nicola Roxon who was quite rabid while tearing a colleague, a former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd to pieces before, during and after the leadership challenge earlier this year? not a bad word about anyone, yeah right, I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of Nicola Roxon, she is a very bad performing politician who blames everyone else for her lack of power to be anything but mediocre

      Commenter
      GJS
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:33AM
    • Dear Mr. Evan,
      The AG has set a new standard. I believe all future AG's should be measured by this new standard.

      Commenter
      Scruffy
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:40AM
    • Guys - Take it easy - Evan has been taking the p#ss with such statements for some time - I was actually wondering the other day what had happened to him in recent times having not heard from him.

      Commenter
      Smack
      Location
      City of the Fallen
      Date and time
      October 18, 2012, 9:41AM

More comments

Comments are now closed
Featured advertisers

Special offers

Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo