JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Exploring the brave frontier of a new name for the ACT

A clipping from a newspaper article on the naming of Canberra

A clipping from a newspaper article on the naming of Canberra

Continuing on last week’s naming theme – Frontierland, anyone? – a comment on the Canberra naming story from Ray caught my eye:

It is nice to reflect on the naming of Canberra and the effort that went into choosing a suitable name.

However, this raises the question as to why such little effort or imagination went into naming the Australian Capital Territory. 

Somehow we arrived at very nice distinct names for the capital cities for each Australian state, but only Tasmania stands up as a suitable name for an existing state or territory. Compare the existing names with those used in USA, Canada, UK or France. Such names as Texas, Arizona, Quebec or Provence etc. No need for the country, state, territory or province to be included in the name as they stand alone as representing their region.

Maybe 100 years would have been a suitable time to revisit the Territory name?

Good thinking, Ray. The Australian Capital Territory is indeed a stultifying – if technically correct – name for Canberra’s home.

And all the other states have dud names too! My partner is from Laos, and the provinces there have lyrical names, so much that he and three of his siblings are named after some of them. How did we get so boring?

Although, it must be said – and my colleague Ian Warden has mused on this fact before – the site for Canberra was chosen by fine, upstanding, hard-working Protestant-work-ethic type blokes who honestly thought cold weather and bracing air was better for productivity. That is why we’re so far inland.

Basically, they were just homesick for London (although, if we’re talking bad weather, I’m afraid Melbourne, not Canberra, takes the cake). I guess the country’s states were named by similarly no-nonsense types. From where I stand now, I wouldn’t have objected if they’d just named them after themselves.

So what would we call the ACT if we had the chance to rename it? How about Myola? Or even Federalia?

4 comments so far

  • How about Brindabella for the ACT and Uluru for the NT?

    Commenter
    Swampfire
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    January 30, 2013, 3:39PM
    • Queens' City

      Commenter
      Eudaimonia
      Location
      Kingston
      Date and time
      January 30, 2013, 5:24PM
      • How about 'Boring' or "Anywhere But Here'. How about Canberra RVM (Rear Vision Mirror) - the best way to see Canberra.

        Commenter
        sparky59
        Location
        Canberra
        Date and time
        January 30, 2013, 9:58PM
        • How about Hilland

          Commenter
          Helen
          Date and time
          January 31, 2013, 10:03AM

          Make a comment

          You are logged in as [Logout]

          All information entered below may be published.

          Error: Please enter your screen name.

          Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

          Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

          Error: Please enter your comment.

          Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

          Post to

          You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

          Thank you

          Your comment has been submitted for approval.

          Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

          Featured advertisers