JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Why do we need any more semi-automatic pistols in Australia?

Date

Samantha Lee

Remembering the Port Arthur massacre ... as the law now stands, a licensed gun owner may legally purchase a military-style, semi-automatic pistol with a magazine capacity of 10 rounds.

Remembering the Port Arthur massacre ... as the law now stands, a licensed gun owner may legally purchase a military-style, semi-automatic pistol with a magazine capacity of 10 rounds.

April is an eerie time of year. Sixteen years ago this month, Martin Bryant opened fire at historic Port Arthur in Tasmania, killing 35 people and wounding 18 others.

This month also marks the anniversaries of the Columbine massacre of April 20, 1999 in the US, where 13 people were killed and at least 21 injured, the Virginia Tech massacre of April 16, 2007, where 32 people died and 25 were injured, and now Oakland's Oikos University massacre, which happened two weeks ago, in which seven were killed and three injured.

Timing is not the only factor these atrocities have in common; the other is the use of semi-automatic firearms.

A semi-automatic gun, also known as a self-loading firearm, is used in most of these types of massacres because of the weapon's automatic reloading capability. Each time the trigger is pulled, ammunition is automatically loaded into the chamber. A person can fire up to 20 shots without needing to stop and reload.

There are two main types of semi-automatics: longarms (also known as rifles and shotguns) and handguns (also known as pistols).

After Port Arthur, Australia banned semi-automatic longarms, but did not extend the ban to semi-automatic pistols. Why?

The explanations that various analysts have provided include that Bryant used semi-automatic longarms, not handguns; that in 1996 the law on handguns was near to uniform across Australia; and that it would have made it extremely difficult to obtain the National Agreement on Firearms if pistols were included.

Whatever the reasons for putting to one side the issue of handguns, this ongoing legal anomaly has become a major public concern for Australia, requiring immediate attention.

In 2002, in response to the Monash shooting in Melbourne, the then prime minister, John Howard, banned some types of handguns, but left many more legally available.

As the law now stands, a licensed gun owner may legally purchase a military-style, semi-automatic pistol with a magazine capacity of 10 rounds, along with an unlimited supply of ammunition.

A child as young as 12 in most states, or under 12 in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, may use a high-powered, military style pistol under adult supervision. Handguns are mostly used for target shooting within gun clubs.

Sporting shooters prefer semi-automatic handguns because they are lightweight, they have high firepower and a large calibre and they are compact - unfortunately, these are the very same reasons why those who commit drive-by shootings prefer them.

According to the Australian Institute of Criminology, handguns have become the weapon of choice for use in firearm-related crime. Although firearm-related crime is still relatively low in Australia, the use of handguns to commit such crime has been steadily increasing, especially since the banning of semi-automatic longarms.

In the last 12 months, Sydney has had to contend with a spate of handgun crime.

In January, the head of the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Don Weatherburn, said the spate of shootings was the "worst he has seen in a decade".

The number of drive-by shooting incidents had risen from 73 in 2010 to 88 last year, a rate of around seven drive-by shootings each month.

On Monday night in Sydney, there were no fewer than five shootings, police reported, as crime gangs use mostly handguns to settle scores and fight for control of the drug trade.

The Minister for Home Affairs, Jason Clare, and others have begun to make comparisons with the Cabramatta heroin-related crime wave of the 1990s.

Clare wrote yesterday that he has given the green light for a firearms intelligence and targeting team recommended by Customs.

But as obvious as this statement may seem, it still needs saying: drive-by shootings only occur because a person has gained access to a firearm.

How did they gain access to a gun? All guns start out legal before they become illegal. Both the Australian Institute of Criminology and the Australian Crime Commission have reported firearm theft as the major source for guns moving into the illegal market. Another source is the leakage of firearms from rogue retailers.

Despite the recent discovery of firearm parts being mailed to a Sydney post office, gun theft from the legal gun market still remains the major source for guns moving into the illegal market. Why take the risk of illegally importing firearms when you can get what you want right here?

In five years, 7723 firearms have been reported stolen across Australia. The majority were taken from private residential premises (77 per cent in 2008-09). Most were registered and most have never been recovered.

It is a simple premise: the more guns available in the legal market, the more guns available for the illegal market. Since the Port Arthur massacre, Australia has imported more than 100,000 handguns, most of them semi-automatic.

Banning the importation and ownership of semi-automatics will not suddenly stop drive-by shootings, but it will eventually make it more difficult to obtain high-powered firearms used to commit such crime, and it will reduce the likelihood of another massacre.

One day in the future, the month of April could commemorate an anniversary of an entirely different kind - the banning of all semi-automatic firearms in Australia.

Who will be the politician brave enough to make it happen?

Samantha Lee is co-chairwoman of the National Coalition for Gun Control and was awarded a Churchill Fellowship to research the use of handguns in crime.

twitter Follow the National Times on Twitter: @NationalTimesAU


121 comments

  • "It is a simple premise: the more guns available in the legal market, the more guns available for the illegal market."

    A simple premise that has been proven to be factually incorrect time and time again.

    Look at gun crime UK and look at the impact of the CCW laws in the US. Australia has a choice...

    Commenter
    davidb
    Date and time
    April 18, 2012, 8:29AM
    • Unless you are an animal farmer, a police or security officer, or a soldier, I don't really see a legal reason that you should be carrying a gun of any type. Just ban them all outside of those professions.

      Easier said than done I guess. As usual as it is with politicking.

      Commenter
      Adrian
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      April 18, 2012, 8:36AM
      • By golly yes. Let's ban everything that has ever killed anyone. This is the same thesis that is used to justify banning drugs and we all know how well that's worked.

        Commenter
        Nicho
        Location
        Sydney
        Date and time
        April 18, 2012, 8:47AM
        • Samantha is missing one important point, guns don't kill people, people kill people. If you follow her logic through we should also ban knives as I think you will find they are 'responsible' for the death and injury of thousands of people every year. Does she really think that the bikie-gangs and the crooks of this world care what you ban ? They will get what they want, when they want it from a variety of illegal sources as recently seen in Sydney when they were having their new Glocks delivered to their local post office from Germany.

          Commenter
          EddieD
          Location
          NSW South Coast
          Date and time
          April 18, 2012, 8:53AM
          • typical scare tactics used always and without fail by LR? - may use a high-powered, military style pistol under adult supervision.

            False - A person can fire up to 20 shots without needing to stop and reload - in Australia we are restricted to a capacity of 10.

            and why pick 20?, a significant portion of handguns maximum manufacturer magazine capacities are actually less than 20.

            this is just the tip of the iceberg of your typical ignorant sweeping statements about law abiding firearm owners who have been treated like criminal scum for as long as I've been shooting for (10years) and even longer than that.

            more resources should be put into stopping illegal activity with firearms and not legal use. re; customs has more holes than a leaky sieve - guns illegally imported via Australia post and into the hands of criminals.

            Commenter
            your joking right
            Date and time
            April 18, 2012, 8:55AM
            • Semi-automatic handguns have a legitimate military purpose as a 'sidearm' - a lightweight weapon of last resort. They have no legitimate civilian purpose whatsoever, outside of law enforcement, and even that is debatable. Ban the lot of them.

              Commenter
              Mazdafarian
              Location
              Sydney
              Date and time
              April 18, 2012, 8:56AM
              • Cars kill people when accidents occur. It's a simple premise: the more cars on the road, the more people will die. Why don't we ban cars on the road to eliminate the risk of people being killed on the roads?

                Yes, I'll agree that is quite different to guns, but perhaps the policing of gun ownership should be stricter. Perhaps inspections of gun safes needs to be more frequent. Perhaps those caught with stolen guns or parts need to be penalised more heavily.

                Rather than ruin a perfectly legal practice such as owning a gun for sport, hunting, vermin control, etc, why not go after the people who are committing the crime.

                And no, I don't have a gun licence and hence I don't own any guns, but I am applying for the licence and then will apply for a gun, and I will be a responsible gun owner.

                Commenter
                Jezeremy
                Location
                Sydney
                Date and time
                April 18, 2012, 9:08AM
                • People that need guns. Police and some farmers for livestock protection.

                  The rest of you stop overcompensating.

                  Commenter
                  J
                  Location
                  sydney
                  Date and time
                  April 18, 2012, 9:10AM
                  • Totally agree with you about the short arms, and can I say it's a pleasure to read an article by a journalist who actually show some knowledge of the subject.

                    The deficiencies of the legislation were apparent in my local, rural area when convicted crims set up their own gun club so they could legally use pistols.

                    One quibble - in my younger days I was a "sporting shooter" for some decades and NO sporting shooter ever carried or used a handgun in the field. Anyone who was known to use them was shunned just as much as drinkers and random sprayers as uncouth, unsafe, idiots.

                    Commenter
                    BillR
                    Date and time
                    April 18, 2012, 9:11AM
                    • Agreed - why allow handguns at all?

                      _If_ someone wants to own a handgun they should mandatorily be both a member of a registered gun club, and have to store their weapon and amunition at secure monitored facilities owned by that club.

                      "But the cost would be prohibitive" I hear? What cost a dead child? What cost 35 dead tourists? If people want to own the weapons they need to accept the consequences. If they don't accept them or can't afford them they need to surrender their weapon.

                      Commenter
                      Aunty
                      Date and time
                      April 18, 2012, 9:14AM

                      More comments

                      Comments are now closed
                      Featured advertisers