Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Compulsory Super not enough

Many Australians will not be able to rely on compulsory superannuation contributions alone in preparing for retirement.

PT2M42S http://www.canberratimes.com.au/action/externalEmbeddedPlayer?id=d-28va6 620 349

Don't let government tinkering of the superannuation rules stop you from making voluntary contributions to superannuation. While the fiddling is likely to be never-ending, the government is always going to make sure there are decent tax incentives for ordinary people to save for their retirement.

The rules are not perfect, but relying on compulsory contributions alone will not be enough to provide a comfortable retirement, and the tax breaks on super remain attractive.

It is the lowering of the cap or limit that can be salary sacrificed into super that is causing the most concern.

No stash ... mothers are often behind the eight ball when it comes to stashing cash for retirement.

No stash ... mothers are often behind the eight ball when it comes to stashing cash for retirement. Photo: Camilo Jimenez

As part of the Howard government reforms that simplified superannuation, those aged 50 or older were allowed to salary sacrifice up to $100,000 a year of pre-tax income into their super from July 1, 2007.

All taxpayers subsidise the tax breaks on super, and those who can afford to put the most into super receive the biggest tax breaks.

The argument for high caps is that the more people save for their retirement, the less the government will have to spend on the age pension. But the reality is that relatively few people of pensionable age are truly self-funded. One of the reasons for that is the generous means testing of the age pension. On reaching pensionable age, a couple can have assets of about $1 million, excluding the family home, and still qualify for a part pension. Qualifying for even a small age pension gives full access to pensioner discounts.

That helps explain why the cap for over-50s was lowered to $50,000 by the Rudd government from the year 2009-10. The need to balance the budget explains why the cap was reduced to $25,000 for all ages by the Gillard government from 2012-13. Also, from 2012-13, those with incomes of more than $300,000 a year will have the tax on their super contributions doubled from 15 per cent to 30 per cent, affecting about 1.2 per cent of taxpayers.

Even though the contributions cap includes the 9 per cent superannuation guarantee, for most people salary sacrificing is still a very good deal. Someone on the average wage of about $70,000 can sacrifice $18,700 a year. Not many people, particularly those with children living at home, could afford to sacrifice up to the cap.

But there are people for whom the cap is a problem - mainly women who have broken work patterns. When the children become independent, many choose to return to full-time work. And with the mortgage paid off, they may at last have the capacity to put a large portion of their before-tax pay into their super.

It was with these people in mind that the government had intended to allow a higher cap of $50,000 for over-50s with super balances of less than $500,000. But it has deferred implementing the measure until July 1, 2014.