Everyone's entitled to an opinion, but online news sites are now less interested in giving readers' a chance to voice it.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
That's the view of Press Council chair Professor Julian Disney, who said cautious publishers were increasingly limiting the number of articles they opened for reader comments because of abusive posts.
Professor Disney said there had been a notable decline in the number of 'open' articles compared to two years ago.
"The quality of comments that are being received on a lot of streams have led newspapers to just not open them on many articles," he said.
"There are some topics which editors say, 'we know what we will get if we open a comment stream'– and that means that those who wanted to comment on that topic in a responsible way cannot do it, because of the excesses and abuses of other people.
"It is a classic example where overshoot means freedom of speech has been limited, because editors – for understandable reasons in my view – have just said, 'look it's not worth it for us, it's spoiling the brand'."
Nearing four years in the peak media regulation role, Professor Disney said his comments were based on an internal check about a year ago, as well as talking with editors directly.
But Fairfax Media's digital production managing editor Carlos Monteiro said the aim of its news sites was to expand audience engagement by increasing the number of comments published.
"We have not dropped the number - in fact, there has been a substantial increase since our new Comment section was launched last March," Mr Monteiro said.
"Our commenting volume is a monthly average of 85,000 comments approved and posted across the five masthead news websites."
"Our goal is to lift this to 150,000-plus a month and enable full reader participation around the clock and on weekends," Mr Monteiro said.
Rob Ashton, a comment moderator for Fairfax Media's five metropolitan news websites including canberratimes.com.au, said he had seen no move to opening fewer articles to reader comments.
Mr Ashton – who does not make the decision to open or close an article to comments, but can alert editors to issues – said articles reporting criminal charges were sometimes best not opened.
"For example, if someone is charged but not found guilty – because commenters will assume they are guilty - they will say, 'the criminal that did this', 'that crook' etc.," he said.
“If we open articles up for Muslim immigration, we’ll have a higher rejection rate – [but] that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t open them.
“We should be open to opening up articles on controversial topics such as Muslim immigration, same–sex marriage, asylum seekers arriving by boat, which we currently do."
Professor Disney, who will give the annual Kenneth Myer Lecture on media standards online in an internet world at the National Library of Australia on Thursday, said online standards had improved overall.
"I think it is more sophisticated – if I was speaking about the newspapers' websites, I think there has been a greater willingness in the last couple of years to recognise problems and address them, and that includes comment streams," he said.
Chief online producer of canberratimes.com.au Lucy Rickard said inviting comments on articles was important for engaging readers and generating conversation about local Canberra issues.
"We open comments on locally produced stories every day, and it's a balancing act to select stories that will generate some comments," Ms Rickard said.
"News about parking issues in the Parliamentary Triangle, for example, is the kind of topic that tends to generate a lot of discussion and useful insights and opinions from our readers.
"But if the comments come in and there's the potential for defamation or other legal issues, we choose to close them."
As a general rule, crime and court reports, especially ongoing cases, were a no-go for comments.
Comments submitted that simply attacked other commenters or did not add to the debate were unlikely to be published.
You can view Fairfax Media's policy on comments here.