News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Abortion reform bill passed in Victorian lower house 

Abortion reform bill passed in Victorian lower house

12 Sep, 2008 12:09 PM
Victoria is one step closer to a more liberal abortion regime after landmark legislation was passed early this morning after a marathon session in the Legislative Assembly.

The Bill was passed 48-28 after 41 admendments were moved and defeated in a marathon sitting that ended at 12.48am.

The next hurdle is the upper house, where debate is due to begin next month and a tighter vote is expected.

After it was passed, Health Minister Daniel Andrews told Parliament that the debate had been "complex and challenging".

"But I think it has been conducted in a spirit that I think does every member and this institution great credit," he said.

Nationals leader Peter Ryan, who opposed the Bill, said the debate was conducted in the right spirit.

The Abortion Law Reform Bill has caused splits within parties, leading to the unusual sight of Opposition Leader Ted Baillieu sitting behind Premier John Brumby, while Deputy Premier Rob Hulls crossed the floor.

While opponents proposed a number of amendments, the Bill to decriminalise terminations up to the 24th week of gestation passed easily.

Abortions after 24 weeks will require the consent of two doctors.

The Bill marks the first time Victorian politicians have meaningfully tackled abortion law, and aims to remove terminations from the Crimes Act.

Current practice relies on common law and a 1969 Supreme Court ruling that outlines when abortion is legal.

About 20,000 abortions a year are performed in Victoria.

Mr Brumby said the Bill was not designed to increase that number, simply to remove the threat of criminal proceedings.

All parties have allowed a conscience vote, leaving the parties split.

Mr Baillieu supported the Bill while Mr Ryan, his Coalition deputy, voted against.

Sports Minister James Merlino was among the most outspoken opponents, saying the Bill would mean "open slather" and lead to more terminations. Mr Merlino led the opposition to the Bill, introducing a number of the proposed amendments.

The Bill has caused controversy, with protests inside and outside Parliament, as well as threats to pro-choice politicians. At least one threat has been taken so seriously the police are investigating.

Mr Brumby said on Thursday he was confident the Bill would be passed comfortably, although he conceded the vote would be closer in the Legislative Council.

"We've had a lot of debate," he said.

"At times it's been emotional debate, passionate debate, and we've seen that come through in the Parliament, but it's also been respectful debate."

Mr Hulls, also the Attorney-General, was the most senior Government minister to break ranks with Mr Brumby and vote against the Bill.

As close friends and colleagues since Mr Brumby's days in the Hawke Government, the two discussed the matter before the vote.

The Premier said he respected Mr Hulls's decision.

"I've made really clear in this debate that these are matters that are deeply held, and they are and that's why there is a conscience vote," Mr Brumby said.

"Rob thought long and hard about his position. He spoke to me about that yesterday [Wednesday]. His view, for personal reasons, was that he wished to oppose the legislation. He advised me of that, and I said he should vote as his conscience dictates."

Mr Brumby was asked to expand on Mr Hulls's reasons for opposing the Bill, but declined.

"That's a personal thing for him, and everyone's got their reasons," he said.

An amendment to reduce the limit for an abortion from 24 weeks into a pregnancy to 20 weeks was defeated 48-30.

The debate leading to the Legislative Council's vote on the legislation is due to begin next months. Amendments are expected to be proposed in that chamber as well.

Mr Brumby would not entertain speculation about what amendments might be acceptable to the Government.

He said he expected the legislation to become law by year's end.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm all for a woman's right to choose, but abortion at 24 weeks is just wrong, even 20 weeks is too far. Having given birth to a baby at 25 weeks I cannot comprehend how anybody could think it's reasonable to deliberately end the life of a child that age. Premmy babies are surviving younger and younger thanks to advances in medicine. It's madness, and at the risk of sounding cliche, it is murder. Babies who die after 20 weeks gestation are required by law to have a funeral and are issued a death certificate (I know, I had to bury my daughter born at 25 weeks). If a child is aborted at 24 weeks, do the parents then get to have a funeral and mourn the baby they had a hand in ending the life of? It just doesn't make sense. I really hope this bill doesn't get passed.
Posted by Nicole, 12/09/2008 3:03:19 PM
I'm sorry Nicole. But I have seen families struggling with Disabled children. There is so little help for single mothers, and they and their children suffer so much discrimination, especially in Canberra, that I wouldn't wish an unplanned pregnancy on anyone. Just look at the statistics! The number of pregnant women who are murdered, the pressures from partners to keep working because of the cost, and the pressures from the general community to force single mothers into the workforce! I didn't choose to be a single parent, but the lack of support is outrageous. The mother and her children are condemned to a life of poverty and eternal sacrifice. Apart from childbirth, adoption is a pretty cruel option.
Posted by Annie, 12/09/2008 3:55:34 PM
Agreed. It seems a little inhumane, if you dont want it put it up for adoption. I think the 3 month rule is good, if your still not sure when you've been pregnant for nearly 3 months then abort it... 24 weeks is insane. It is like murder.
Posted by Driver, 12/09/2008 4:16:33 PM
LOL @ DRIVER! I almost choked when I read your comment Driver! You stated, "if your still not sure when you've been pregnant for nearly 3 months then abort it... 24 weeks is insane. It is like murder.". So 20-23 weeks is okay...24 weeks is murder!! Don't know what gives politicians the power to determine when an embryo is a human.
Posted by Francis White, 12/09/2008 4:21:31 PM
Yeah ok.. So anyway. What i DID wrtie was 3 MONTHS IS OK... I BELIEVE 3 MONTHS IS 9 WEEKS?? Anything after that is bad... so maybe you should get off your high horse :) 3 months is generally the cut off for abortions and it should stay like that. If you knew anything "Francis" you wouldnt make stupid comments.
Posted by Driver, 12/09/2008 4:42:14 PM
** 12 weeks**
Posted by Driver, 12/09/2008 4:48:20 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
University of Canberra - click here
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...