News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Actew blames lawyers for blackouts 

Actew blames lawyers for blackouts

29 Oct, 2009 07:40 AM
Actew Corporation managing director Mark Sullivan has denied allegations of a cover-up after the territory-owned water carrier released heavily-censored documents about the cost blow-out for the enlarged Cotter Dam.

The ACT Opposition and Greens had called on the ACT Government to seek documents from Actew that would explain why the estimated cost for the project increased from $120 million in 2005 to $363 million, but large sections were blacked out of about 1000 pages issued on Tuesday.

Mr Sullivan said yesterday the redaction had been done in accordance with legal advice Actew had received to protect commercial-in-confidence information. This also explained why even his name had been blacked out from the documents.

''It was on very senior legal advice and it's legal advice which as an officer of a corporation I must follow,'' Mr Sullivan said.

''There was legal advice saying delete people's names and some of those deletions include telephone numbers ... If I'd known that in interpreting that we'd delete everyone's name including mine it wouldn't have happened.''

Among the documents issued to the Opposition and Greens was an independent review of the cost estimate process done by accounting firm Deloittes.

Although the report endorsed the methodology used to arrive at the revised estimate of $363 million, it criticised how some of the earlier price tags had been calculated, finding, ''The scale of the discrepancy between the initial and final project cost estimates indicates that a failure at multiple stages of the cost estimate process has occurred.''

Mr Sullivan blamed a misunderstanding about how the initial estimates should have been treated. Early estimates of $120 million and $145 million had been for the cost of the building work, not the overall cost of the project.

''I think [Deloittes'] conclusion is a simple one: the preliminary estimate should never have been portrayed as the total cost of the dam,'' Mr Sullivan said.

''I think then that in terms of progressing that dollar price through government and through the regular it grew a life of its own as the total project cost of the dam. What Deloittes is saying is that somewhere that went wrong because it was never that.''

ACT Environment Minister Simon Corbell defended Actew during a Legislative Assembly committee hearing yesterday, following intense questioning from Opposition leader Zed Seselja.

''I'm satisfied that that figure is soundly based, we've got independent confirmation that the final cost of the project is a robust one and there is not any significant prospect of significant change to it,'' MrCorbell said.

Mr Corbell said the revised cost was also justified because it cost the ACT as much to maintain Stage 4 water restrictions for one year.

''Anyone who is criticising the cost should have regard to the alternative, which is Stage 4 water restrictions having an economic impact on our city of $350million every year that they're in place,'' he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
And you're telling me that ACTEW and Stanhope are not rubbing their hands together in glee at the blowout!!!! ACTEW will be able to 'justify' to Stanhope the need to raise water charges and maybe Jon can levy a new tax on us. How else are they going to pay for this!!! And guess what folks.... the RBA will use this increase in water charges to 'facilitate' yet another 'factor' in raising interest rates as it will contribute to inflation (as have all the recent inflation figures suggested.... only govt charges have gone through the roof!!!)
Posted by phantom, 29/10/2009 8:51:56 AM
'Mr Corbell said the revised cost was also justified because it cost the ACT as much to maintain Stage 4 water restrictions for one year'. This quote sums up the whole saga (for me). His government has been developing new suburbs and high density building without any thought to infrastructure. Everyone except the government and ACTEW knew the rapid growth of our city was putting strain on all of our essential services but where was the planning for infrastructure, especially water - and even if they do acknowledge this then they still failed to act. ABS statistics say for ever head of population then 300 litres of water per day is required. This figure also allows for our usage by our industries. So it is pretty easy to work out how much we need for our needs given the present and future population. If they care to look at the history of the Warragamba Dam (serving Sydney) then they will see it was designed to cater for 4 million people back in the 1940s. Great foresight and vision by our leaders back then that is sadly lacking in todays 'leaders'. Or then again, maybe I have it all wrong and it is the drought....
Posted by olfella, 29/10/2009 10:55:19 AM
I think you're right olfella. these pollies don't think past the next election - the very epitome of selfishness. Their naive adherence to policies which assume ever increasing everything is a reflection of the ways babyboomers have stuffed up the world for their kids to (hopefully) clean up.
Posted by bo, 29/10/2009 2:11:54 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...