News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Data deluge to make sceptics feel the heat 

Data deluge to make sceptics feel the heat

30 Jul, 2010 01:00 AM
Three ''exceptional'' heatwaves across Australia in 2009 helped make it the nation's second hottest year on record and contributed to a new worldwide report which has found global warming is for real and has not ''stopped'', as some sceptics have suggested.

The 2009 State of the Climate report issued yesterday by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and British Met Office brings together for the first time nearly 50 independent records of global trends covering 10 aspects of climate change, from temperature rises over land and sea and increases in ocean heat content and sea level, to decreases in snow cover, the size of glaciers and the area covered by Arctic sea ice.

Australia's extreme conditions, such as the massive east coast dust storm, Victoria's deadly Black Saturday bushfires and flooding on the NSW mid-North Coast, are all featured in the report as examples of climate events attributed to global warming.

Australia's maximum temperatures were generally above average in 2009, with the biggest gap between 1.5 and 2 degrees experienced in inland NSW, southern Queensland and to the west of Alice Springs. Minimum temperatures were also above average through most of the country and Australia's average rainfall for the year had been 458mm 2per cent below average. The warmest year on record for Australia was 2005, but the report predicts this year may prove to be hotter.

Head of climate monitoring and attribution at the Met Office, Peter Stott, said greenhouse gases were ''the glaringly obvious explanation'' for the 0.56 degree rise in average global temperatures over the past 50 years.

''Despite the fact people say global warming has stopped, the new data, added on to existing data, gives us the greatest evidence we have ever had,'' he said. ''When we follow decade-to-decade trends using different data sets and independent analyses from around the world, we see clear and unmistakable signs of a warming world.''

with The Independent and The Daily Telegraph, London

For more, pick up a copy of today's Canberra Times

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There are two types of sceptics, which is something journalists and politicians can't seem to get their heads around. Firstly: there are those who just deny climate change outright even though there is clear evidence to suggest it is actually happening. Secondly: There are those who recognise that climate change is real but are not convinced that the cause is human made. I am in the second camp. One of the things that struck me during the political debate about the ETS was the manner in which politicians (particularly the Greens) dismissed scientific research tabled in Parliament that clearly articulated climate change as a regular occurence during history, well before the industrial age even commenced. If someone out there can - please convince me otherwise. But do it with facts, not emotion.
Posted by Straightshooter, 30/07/2010 9:30:01 AM, on The Canberra Times
Actually, I could do with a bit of global warming today. I'm not a skeptic about climate change - I think you are being unreasonable if you don't think the climate is changing. What I am skeptical about is if it is caused by man, or is this just the cycle of the earth? I just wish that we would not brain wash the children to believing it is man-made until we know for sure that it is.
Posted by James, 30/07/2010 9:53:49 AM, on The Canberra Times
The reason we are being told it is man made is because there is no money to be made from trying to change a naturally occuring event. The "blissfully unaware" in society keep pushing the barrow about the new religion "climate change" and have convinced themselves that they have to power to change nature. The news is "you dont have that power". Just like the religious folk that turn up at my door trying to lead me to "their version" of a better life I say "Get......(oops, I cant say that here can I)
Posted by GT, 30/07/2010 10:34:27 AM, on The Canberra Times
A few hot summers implies climate change according to the doomsayers, and we should all risk economic suicide in implementing very costly, unproven "solutions". History tells us our climate is surely like waves on the ocean, up and down, big and small, changing all the time. The real issue is are mankind generating this current warm period or is it just a natural occurrence? Let's see that science before wasting any more of my taxes on hair-brained half-solutions.
Posted by ex-Baron-of-Bruce, 30/07/2010 11:00:54 AM, on The Canberra Times
If a Dr told you that 90% of the science said you would survive an ilness using a certain medication and that had minimal side effects AND could actually make you healthier. Would you give it a go, or simply say "I'm a skeptic"???
Posted by Joe M, 30/07/2010 11:10:37 AM, on The Canberra Times
@Joe M. What are you trying to say? Are you suggesting that 90% of scientists say that we will stop climate change by cutting down on the carbon pollutions? If you are, I'm sorry, my friend, you are greatly mistaken. There is a great number of scientists who will tell you that we cannot change the climate. That is the whole point - the "Science" IS NOT THERE! What happens if we "give it a go" and it does nothing? Meanwhile, our economy is shot to pieces, and our children - the ones we are supposed to be "protecting" from this environmental "disaster" - end up spending their lives paying for the poor judgment of their parents.
Posted by James, 30/07/2010 12:20:19 PM, on The Canberra Times
What caused the last Ice Age to retreat? Neanderthals driving cars?
Posted by Baby Boomer Al, 30/07/2010 12:38:50 PM, on The Canberra Times
Does anyone seriously believe that we as humans have and have had absolutely no affect on the climate. So pollution is okay, ripping up forests is okay the degradaion of our rivers systems is okay and none of these things have affected the Earths climate. Yes there have been nature driven climate change. To argue because that is true that we have had no affect on the Earths climate defies logic. Maybe the earth really is flat because so many people have that kind of thinking.
Posted by jayell, 30/07/2010 12:46:02 PM, on The Canberra Times
I'm amazed. Every single time there is a new report that shows dramatic and alarming changes occurring to the Earth's climate, some people just turn it straight into a trivial political debate. And the crux of this debate seems to be a desire to simply not worry about it, howl down the so-called "doomsayers", and defend one's constitutional right to do absolutely nothing - just live out your life, watch TV, and eventually die. To all those who are saying they "accept" that the climate is changing whilst also denying that it has anything to do with human activity: Let's suppose for a moment (and I disagree) that you're completely right. Isn't the end result still exactly the same? The science broadly points toward a shift in the Earth's climate that will have devastating consequences for plant and animal life, as well as human society over coming decades. Do you think your children or their children will understand you for sitting back in your armchairs going "Wasn't me, guv'ner! The Earth did it!"? Or do we - as the only intelligent curators of the planet and the only ones with the ability to transform it - have an obligation to do what we can to help curb ecological disaster?
Posted by Hiber, 30/07/2010 12:48:49 PM, on The Canberra Times
"Two swallows do not make a summer" ...rampant world-wide population growth has and will cause infinately more enviromental damage. We could go back to the stone age in Australia and still not make a scrap of difference to world-wide climate variations which naturally occur at both ends of the scale.
Posted by dusty, 30/07/2010 2:35:42 PM, on The Canberra Times
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
SHRINKING FEELING: A combination of NOAA images issued yesterday show September Arctic sea ice in 1979 and in 2009.The areas of ice coverage range from 15 per cent (darker shades of medium blue) to complete coverage (lightest blue). The white circles over the pole indicate areas of no data.
SHRINKING FEELING: A combination of NOAA images issued yesterday show September Arctic sea ice in 1979 and in 2009.The areas of ice coverage range from 15 per cent (darker shades of medium blue) to complete coverage (lightest blue). The white circles over the pole indicate areas of no data.

Most popular articles

Australian Running Festival

CIT - Business ad dec
 
Feb Buy Smart
 
multicumulticultural festivalltural festival


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...