News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Deserted cottage bill $3000 a month 

Deserted cottage bill $3000 a month

06 Sep, 2010 09:53 AM
More than two years after the ACT Government evicted the Farrell family from the caretaker's cottage at Weston it has spent almost $300,000 on the site and the bill is growing.

Further payments for security and gardening for the untenanted property total almost $3000 every month.

Documents obtained under freedom of information rules by the ACT Greens show vandals have been gutting the property and security costs have exceeded $110,000.

Chief Minister Jon Stanhope said he expected the property to be let in March next year.

He denied allegations that the Government had mishandled the project by letting the historic cottage fall into ruin. But the Greens say the episode has been mismanaged from the start.

Mr Stanhope said the house, which currently stands in the middle of a construction site, could not be let because of the surrounding development.

''We did significant works. We almost gutted and replaced the interior,'' he said.

''My understand is that it couldn't be tenanted sooner.''

The Farrell family was evicted from the property after the ACT Government accused them of squatting, but the Farrells maintain they were given the keys as caretakers of the cottage.

They admit they did not pay rent but invested $75,000 of their own money to refurbish the vandalised property and stop further damage.

Greens leader Meredith Hunter said ACT taxpayers had to foot the bill for the Government's blundering.

''The cost is not just monetary; the cost is also the cost of the heritage and the loss of heritage through vandalism,'' she said.

The freedom of information documents show the security company hired to protect the building has encountered difficulties.

''... security have advised that the break-ins at Stromlo are occurring at a regular time. They are simply waiting for the guard to leave then going in,'' the documents said.

Ms Hunter said, ''I think it would have been a better solution to have the Farrells to stay on the understanding that it may be used as a community facility ... my feelings are that the property would have been well maintained and safeguarded until there had been a decision about a future tenant.''

For more on this story, including comments of the Farrells on what they describe as "institutionalised vandalism", see the print edition of today's Canberra Times.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Here we go again Mr Stanhope is never wrong it's always someone elses fault but his. Pass the buck Stanhope, thesooner we get rid of him the better. MR EGO.
Posted by Sick and tired, 7/09/2010 9:59:04 AM, on The Canberra Times
What they need is some house-proud squatters to look after the joint....like they had.
Posted by dusty, 7/09/2010 7:25:30 PM, on The Canberra Times

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Peter and Jenni Farrell say it's upsetting to see the cottage in which they lived for 26 years ruined at the hands of vandals. Photo: LANNON HARLEY
Peter and Jenni Farrell say it's upsetting to see the cottage in which they lived for 26 years ruined at the hands of vandals. Photo: LANNON HARLEY

Most popular articles

LJ Hooker CIty

Feb Best Buys


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...