News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Doctor denied residency due to Down syndrome son 

Doctor denied residency due to Down syndrome son

31 Oct, 2008 04:12 PM
The federal government must overturn an immigration department decision to deny Australian residency to a German doctor because his son has Down syndrome, the opposition says.

Bernhard Moeller moved with his family to rural Horsham, in central-western Victoria, two and a half years ago to help fill a doctor shortage.

Dr Moeller has a temporary 457 visa which is valid until 2010, but has been denied permanent residency because the department believes his 13-year-old son Lukas would be a drain on the health system.

Coalition disabilities spokesman Cory Bernardi says he has asked Immigration Minister Chris Evans to intervene in the case but continues to pass the buck to the department.

"Minister Evans has the discretionary powers to intervene and approve the residency application of Dr Moeller and his family, yet as media pressure has intensified he has chosen to hide behind the department," Senator Bernardi said.

"It is sad that in this modern day we are still viewing people with a disability, such as Dr Moeller's son, as a burden.

"While children with Down syndrome have some degree of intellectual disability, this usually falls within the mild to moderate range.

"They can and do make significant contributions to our society."

The nation should show Dr Moeller its gratitude, not discriminate against his son, Senator Bernardi said.

"I am sure the community at Horsham would agree with me that the benefits of allowing the Moeller family to stay outweigh what the Department of Immigration and Citizenship has deemed a burden to taxpayers."

The department insists its decision was made in accordance with the law.

The Australian Greens said Dr Moeller's case highlighted the need for cultural change within the immigration department.

"While Immigration Minister Evans has shown willingness to move forward from the regressive policies of the past, it is evident that some outmoded mindsets within his department remain," Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said.

"The public outcry about the Moeller family's case proves not only their value to the region in which they live, but also that the department's decisions are out of step with community attitudes."

A spokesman for Immigration Minister Chris Evans stressed the minister had no power to intervene in the case until after the Migration Review Tribunal had upheld the department's decision.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
During the 21st century, discrimination is one of the most tabooed behaviours of civilised society. To discriminate a family that was first encouraged to immigrate to Australia, and whose medical problems the government was no doubt informed of, is absolutely deplorable. Down Syndrome children, as mentioned before, can be valuable and active members of the community with only a mild to moderate intellectual disability. Many able-bodied people in todays society are much less than this yet, immigration would readily grant such individuals permanent residency.
Posted by Frances, 14/11/2008 11:47:27 AM
Our governments, past and present have actively sought out doctors from across the globe to fill our acute doctor shortage, and if the issue of his disabled son was going to cause so much concern then why bring him here in the first place. Surely the benefits provided to a community of many, by doctor Moeller, will far outweigh the costs from one disabled child. The Minister should wake up to himself and remember that we asked Dr Moeller to come here in the first place, do we now just slap him in the face and say bugger off, were finished with you, I hope not.
Posted by Bob, 1/11/2008 9:06:17 AM
Those people who are ranting about bureaucratic stupidity have no idea about what public servants are required to do. They must obey the law when they make an administrative decision. They just can't make it up as they go along. IF the doctor needs to stay: change the law. It's that simple. Secondly, for over a decade, Howard and his thugs treated so many good people like the doctor with greater contempt. And the Australian people voted for them at least twice on that premise. Not sure why now so many people want to jump up and down about people not being granted full residency.
Posted by Mark, 1/11/2008 6:34:23 AM
I can understand the incredulity displayed on this forum, but the rule of law has been followed, as it should be. Appeals will be made to the appropriate authorities, also as they should be, and common sense will win out in the end.
Posted by Lee, 31/10/2008 7:40:39 PM
come on, it seems simple to me, the isolated country areas have been crying out for doctors this man has come to the rescue of this area and now they are using a very bad excuse to send him away, then they will be crying out for doctors again in that area!! I realise that immigration needs rules but each application still needs to be looked at on a case by case basis.
Posted by boppa, 31/10/2008 7:35:27 PM
I can't believe that the old attitude towards DS is still alive and well. My 13 Y.O. reads at age, cares for his nieces and nephews better than anyone. I am shocked, amazed and saddened that our society sees the value of a human person as being measured in dollars. It isn't the first time this attitude has been shown but I hope it will be the last. The value of a person can't be measured in $ and cents. I feel upset and ashamed that Lukas and his family have been subjected to this in my country.
Posted by saddened, 31/10/2008 5:33:58 PM
I'm sure Dr Moeller will give more to Australian society than his family will ever ask of us. Some people in government need to step into the REAL world, and quickly. He and his family have our support I'm sure. Not all Australians are total morons.
Posted by DrD, 31/10/2008 4:24:11 PM
This is mindless bureaucracy at its worst. A poor decision made by a poor minister, and an under-performing department, in serious need of reform.
Posted by Jeff, 31/10/2008 4:03:57 PM
It seems just a question of how much a person will cost the state - so impersonal and cut throat. Also when adopting children, the government will not pay medical costs if you adopt a child with an existing disability - disgusting - who would wrought the system by adopting a child (usually from a developing country) simply to get money from the government! And it is not as if hundreds of these children are being adopted anyway. My husband and I would definitley consider adopting a child with a disability, but as development workers, we could not afford to pay the medical bills, it seem so heartless - but what can we do? Are we serious in this country about helping out those much less fortunate than we are? The law appears to suggest otherwise...
Posted by Emily, 31/10/2008 3:57:31 PM
this decision is so very wrong. This doctor came to help us with our huge shortage in doctors. This is how we repay him. This shows no respect for his son or his family. Our health system is in so much trouble and we can't afford to turn away decent hardworking doctors. Change the laws right now and this country retains another doctor we so desperately needs. Anyone who disagrees should visit any public hospital emergency room to see just how badly understaffed these hospitals are every single day.
Posted by kathy, 31/10/2008 3:45:34 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Bernhard Moeller and his son Lukas. PHOTO: The Wimmera Times
Bernhard Moeller and his son Lukas. PHOTO: The Wimmera Times

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...