News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Drying, dying, Murray loses wetlands 

Drying, dying, Murray loses wetlands

22 Oct, 2008 07:05 AM
Australia has failed to meet its global obligations to protect important wetlands across the Murray-Darling Basin, with 90 per cent already lost, a new report says.

An environmental group, the Inland Rivers Network, has called for the Rudd Government to amend the 2007 Water Act to create a national wetlands protection program, with explicit laws to prevent water diversion and theft.

It wants future federal management plans for the basin to ensure enough water is set aside to mitigate climate change impacts on wetlands.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the report had identified ''some of the very real challenges for the future in managing our important wetlands against a backdrop of drought and dangerous climate change''.

The report comes as federal delegates are preparing to attend next week's meeting in South Korea of signatories to the global Ramsar treaty on protection of the world's most important wetlands. Australia has 65 wetlands protected by the treaty: 16 of these are in the Murray-Darling Basin.

But since Australia signed the treaty more than 30 years ago the state of the nation's wetlands had ''declined precipitously'', creating a national conservation crisis, according to the report. Reduced river flows caused by over-extraction of water for big irrigation developments in Queensland has killed thousands of river red gums and coolibah trees in the Narran Lakes wetlands of north-eastern NSW.

At least 75 per cent of the lower Murrumbidgee floodplain wetlands have been lost, and four-fifths of the pelican populations in South Australia's Coorong wetlands had gone.

This decline had taken place despite more than 500,000ha of wetlands across the Basin being listed under the international Ramsar Convention as wetlands of world significance, the report's co-author Amy Hankinson said.

Australia has some of the world's best wetlands ecologists, but their research and warnings about threats to river systems had been ignored, she said.

Climate change is predicted to cut river flows across the basin by 11 per cent roughly 2500 gigalitres a year within 20 years.

The Inland Rivers Network, a coalition that includes the National Parks Association and Australian Conservation Foundation, has called on the Government to urgently review the 16 Ramsar-listed wetlands in the Murray-Darling Basin to determine if they should be placed on the Montreux Register of sites in danger.

Australian Greens water spokesman Rachel Siewert said management plans for Ramsar wetlands ''should become statutory plans under the Commonwealth Water Act to stop them being ignored and overridden''.

Senator Siewert said, ''We should also establish a wetlands management fund so that private water managers can help the Commonwealth meet its international commitments to manage wetlands that are on private lands.''

Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt said questions in Senate Estimates yesterday revealed that, despite spending $50 million on water entitlements and another $4 billion on water-saving projects, the Rudd Government's water buyback had yielded little more than a few bits of expensive paper.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The RAMSAR treaty recognises the conservation benefits of sustainable consumptive use of wetland fauna. This is something that the NPA and ACF can not come to terms with due to their preservationist ideology. The low value of wetlands in the minds of many in the (rural) community is a product of the success of preservationists lobby groups, such as the NPA and ACF, have had in getting wetlands locked up and made offlimits to the majority. Keeping the public out of wetlands can not ensure wetland conservation.
Posted by Colin Mortimer, 22/10/2008 11:03:31 AM
Of course the fact that the wetlands are in trouble means that they haven't been used sustainably! Do we have to put a dollar value on everything that is critical for our existence - tragedy of the commons - lack of common sense here - especially in the rural community and in government.
Posted by Concerned Canberran, 22/10/2008 3:44:22 PM
"Do we have to put a dollar value on everything that is critical for our existence?" Unfortunately you dont have to be an economics lecturer at ANU to answer that question in our capitalist society.
Posted by Colin Mortimer, 22/10/2008 9:17:34 PM
The dollar value is all the polluters understand. The thing I find difficult to understand is that we would pay the water users for our water. Maybe down the line we can eventually get damages paid by those who took the water (and the beneficiaries via wills etc) in the first place. I remember in 1968 there being argument that those who were building channels for channel irrigation were "diverting the course of water", hence breaking the law. Hopefully these businesses can be charged and made to pay compensation which can be used to treat the river systems which they have damaged.
Posted by Annie, 23/10/2008 10:25:50 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Design competition - click here
 
Canberras newest magazine - read now
 
Click here to enter the art show
 
Canberra Times photo sales - click here
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...