News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Gallagher, Pell row over Calvary 

Gallagher, Pell row over Calvary

29 Oct, 2009 07:49 AM
Health Minister Katy Gallagher has hit out at the highest ranking Catholic clergyman in Australia, accusing him of interfering in the ACT Government's plans to buy Calvary Public Hospital.

The ACT Government has struck a deal to buy Calvary Hospital from the Little Company of Mary Health for $77 million.

Under the deal, the Little Company of Mary would buy Canberra's hospice, Clare Holland House, for $ 9million.

But the proposal can only go ahead with the Vatican's approval and Ms Gallagher said she was concerned Catholic Archbishop of Sydney Cardinal George Pell's criticisms could scuttle the plan.

''I think it is very concerning if people from outside the ACT are running a campaign that is not what this issue is about and potentially jeopardising the future arrangements for Canberra's health system,'' Ms Gallagher said.

In a statement, Cardinal George Pell said the Government's motives were ideological and driven by anti-Christian elements.

''... Religious freedom is under pressure. The push for a charter of rights should be seen in a wider context that includes the attempt by the ACT Government to force the sale of Calvary Public Hospital in Canberra, which is run by the Little Company of Mary. If it succeeds in this, other public hospitals run by religious organisations will be targeted next,'' Cardinal Pell wrote.

But Ms Gallagher said the sale was about owning an asset the ACT Government funded.

''He's simply not correct. Ideology and Christian values have never been part of the consideration by Government nor should they, I would argue,'' Ms Gallagher said.

''This is around the best way forward for our public health system and as a community it should be something our community decides, not outsiders with very strong views about the role of religion in public health care.''

Cardinal Pell is the highest ranking Catholic clergyman in Australia and Ms Gallagher said the Cardinal's lobbying could influence the Church's decision.

''He is an influential person and ultimately the Vatican does decide on the future of Canberra's own public hospital ... I'm sure the lobbying that is being done in the Church at the moment will continue right up to when that final decision is made.''

Opposition health spokesman Jeremy Hanson said Cardinal Pell's concerns highlighted the flawed nature of the proposal.

''He is entitled to make these comments and I'm sad that it's reached this point that he is accusing the ACT Government of driving an anti-Christian agenda,'' Mr Hanson said.

He said as part of the community consultation process, Cardinal Pell's position needed to be considered.

Earlier this month, vicar-general of the Canberra archdiocese Monsignor John Woods said there was concern that the Church's mission to provide health care would be compromised by the sale.

''The Government's motivation in this instance hasn't been itemised,'' he said.

''We're led to believe that because Little Company of Mary and the ACT Government find a synergy in the proposed sale, then it's self-evidently correct.

''But within the wider populace and within Church circles, that is certainly being discussed and questioned.''

Monsignor Woods' concerns were echoed at three community consultation sessions held by ACT Health.

Community submissions about the development must be delivered to ACT Health by November 12.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
CT says submissions to Dept of Health close on 12 November, but the Dept of Health web site has no link to allow submissions - how does a concerned citizen get his voice heard? Or is the opinion of citizens irrelevant?
Posted by tower1801, 31/10/2009 3:42:57 PM
Tower, the website is probably run by both the Labor Times - sorry, the Canberra Times - and the Govt - both have the same agenda. Voice heard? That's an election catch-cry, not meant to actually be REAL!
Posted by Catherine, 2/11/2009 6:50:37 PM
Why does the Treasurer object to Cardinal Pell's influence on the Calvary Hospital debate? She is aware that the Catholic Church is an international institution. Would she have similar objections to "outsiders" from other national or international institutions, such as Telstra, having a say on their ACT operations? Why does she now feel that the Government should own Calvary Hospital because it has funded it? Does she feel that the Government should also own Catholic schools which also serve the general community and enjoy Government funding? How does she justify her proposal to spend $77M of public funds on the purchase of an already viable institution? Why does the Treasurer insist that "ideology and Christian values" are not a consideration by Government and then qualify her objection to interference by "outsiders" as "those with very strong views about the role of religion in public health care." She clearly subscribes to an ideology that religious opinion has no place in public affairs notwithstanding overwhelming evidence of the enormous contribution to the common good religious institutions have made in past centuries and continue to make thoughout the world.
Posted by Gordon, 2/11/2009 11:40:41 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...