News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Is Palin losing her shine? 

Is Palin losing her shine?

29 Sep, 2008 05:03 PM
She arrived in a blaze of glory and at a stroke injected new life into John McCain's presidential election campaign like a dose of political viagra.

But one month after Sarah Palin was unveiled as the shock Republican vice-presidential pick, the surge of populist momentum provided by the Alaskan governor's elevation to national politics is waning, analysts say.

On Thursday, the photogenic 44-year-old mother-of-five faces the biggest test of her campaign so far when she goes head-to-head in a debate with her Democratic opposite number, the vastly experienced Senator Joseph Biden.

The showdown comes hard on the heels of a faltering performance in a prime-time television interview with CBS anchor Katie Couric last week, and at a time when even conservative commentators are questioning her credentials.

Professor Jack Citrin, professor of political science at the University of California Berkeley, said Palin had been remarkably successful in "mobilising and energising" support since her appointment, but interest was now cooling.

"She was an interesting new face in a kind of politics where celebrity, status and media attention is important," Citrin told AFP.

"Her views and self-presentation appeal to a component of the Republican Party coalition that were not so enthused about McCain.

"But the focus has turned now to figure out what she really knows and what she doesn't know, especially in the context of an economic crisis where people are anxious and alarmed," he said referring to the Wall Street meltdown.

Palin's interview with Couric -- only one of three the McCain campaign has granted to media since her unveiling -- reinforced scepticism surrounding the candidate's ability.

As well as stating -- without explaining how -- that Alaska's proximity to Russia had given her useful foreign policy experience, she said US forces had secured "victory" in Iraq, a bolder assertion than even McCain has offered.

Republican strategist Tony Fabrizio told Politico.com that Palin's interview was cause for concern. "You can't continue to have interviews like that and not take on water," he told the website.

The performance also drew a withering review from prominent pro-Republican columnist Kathleen Parker, who wrote in the National Review that Palin was now such an embarrassment to the party that she should step down.

"Palin's recent interviews with Charles Gibson (ABC News), Sean Hannity (Fox News) and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League," Parker said.

"As we've seen and heard more from John McCain's running mate, it is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem," she added.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp survey last week suggested that 49 per cent of voters believe Palin lacks the leadership qualities required in a president.

However, for some analysts, Palin's limited experience in foreign affairs is unlikely to affect her support among the rank-and-file Republican base, which responds to her staunchly conservative views on abortion, guns and religion.

"The party base doesn't care about foreign policy, so it should not be too much of a concern," said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political analyst at the University of Southern California. "But the media love affair is over."

And Jeffe said she believed it is doubtful that Palin may be able to attract undecided voters or former women supporters of defeated Democratic hopeful Hillary Clinton.

"There's no question she's injected the Republicans with an enthusiasm that John McCain could not," Jeffe said.

"Having said that, she hasn't been able to reach out to Hillary voters in any circumstance. And I think she's probably caused some of the independents and undecideds to think twice about her in the past couple of weeks.

"The polls now indicate that a majority don't think she's ready to be President. And that's not helpful."

Citrin meanwhile said McCain's advanced age -- at 72 he would be the oldest man ever elected to a first term as president -- meant more attention than normal was being paid to Palin's level of experience.

"Let's face it, you really don't need to know that much to be vice-president," Citrin said. "But when the president is a 72-year-old man the stakes are higher than they normally would be."

AFP

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Jeff, I hate to say it but have you considered that sometimes you don't gain respect when you put down your own? I would never curry favour with foreigners by belittling fellow Australians, and let's face it there is enough name calling about Americans as it is. Now to Palin. Is Obama any more experienced? Answer - No. I'll give them both a chance but it seems the boot for the female candidate always hits harder.
Posted by Trixy, 29/09/2008 4:49:47 PM
As a woman and an Alaskan, I can only tell you that Palin is an embarrasment. But more important, she's dangerous. She is a living example of McCain's poor judgment and her own hubris. Many of us are participating in anti-Palin rallies, and we're always hoping you in the lower 48 find out about them.
Posted by Alaskan Woman, 29/09/2008 5:10:55 PM
Ronald Reagan was a governor before he became president. So was Bill Clinton and George Bush just to name a few. Can the readers of this article justify that the former presidents had better foreign policy experience as governors than Sarah Palin has now? Of course the Obama admirers can twist everything but American voters need more than admiration.
Posted by Percy, 29/09/2008 5:18:46 PM
Everyone thinks it is scary that if elected, Sarah Palin MIGHT be the next President of this country. It is even scarier that if Obama wins he will FOR SURE be the next president. Why does Obama's 3 years as a JUNIOR senator trump Palin's four years as Mayor and 2 years as Governor? She actually had to make decisions that she had to answer to. All he had to do is vote yes or no and most of the time he chickened out and voted 'Present'. What a loser. The last time I checked our Constitution the only thing it takes to be President or Vice President is to be a natural born citizen of the US, at least 35 years of age and you must have lived in the US for atleast 14 years. Check! Check! and Check, Yep, shes qualified! Of course Sarah isn't speaking to the media. Every time she has, they tear her apart and dissect every word she says. I am so glad the McCain campaign is smart enough to keep her out of the main stream media. What does the media think, that we are stupid and can't see the games they are playing? They will never show Sarah in a positive light no matter how well she does. She obviously scares the devil out of the Dems. (Tee! Hee!) I live in Alaska and Sarah has done an awesome job for our state. You don't become Alaska's most popular governor in the states history sitting on your thumbs. I think she is going to surprise everyone this Thursday. You would be wrong to underestimate her. Go Sarah and Go McCain/Palin!
Posted by Alaska Girl, 29/09/2008 5:23:54 PM
Sarah Palin's candidacy for vice president is a mockery of educated and intelligent women. It's beyond insulting. It's not that we can't weather this, but it shows us how little John McCain thinks of women and his “Country First” lie. Oops, HE DID IT AGAIN....Well, obviously, McCain puts the himself first and NOT "COUNTRY FIRST" as claimed by his campaign slogan. I don't want a President that is this fragile and reckless with his decisions (a la Bush).
Posted by undecided voter, 29/09/2008 5:50:13 PM
Nick, Biden has had 35 years in congress, he authored the Violence against Women Act and the act against trafficking of women, which is why the National organisation of women vote for him. You need to get a firmer grip on reality because Biden is a man of substance and character while Palin is an idiot.
Posted by Marilyn, 29/09/2008 6:51:37 PM
My problem isn't the amount of experience Palin has (or is lacking.) My problem is that she has no depth of understanding on the issues that our important to our country. She can only give a canned answers to questions that were thought of before by the campaign. A leader needs to fully understand the issues that we face and I don't think she has any interest or has given any forethought on her own. For the posters blaming the media, the media was nothing but too kind to her when she was first announced, giving her leading story and cover page exposure everywhere I looked. It wasn't until she gave interviews and had to think on her own two feet that it became painfully obvious that she is not and never will be ready to be in a position of such power. I encourage everyone to watch Katie Couric's interview with Palin in full. It was like a child giving a book report for which she wasn't prepared. It's a sad but necessary wake up call for our nation.
Posted by Please No Palin, 29/09/2008 7:52:07 PM
Well said, Alaska Girl! And as someone who has always voted Democrat, and who has never voted for a Republican, let me say I concur with you completely. And her popularity rate of 85% in a state where 60% are Independents is a confirmation of what you say and of her effectiveness. Obama's popularity is based on a plethora of words he loves hearing himself speak, and two autobiographies. Egotism has no limits to this do nothing-hang-out for years with criminals and terrorists -phony. And what are these comments about Sarah Palin's religion? She ACTS on her beliefs and values! It takes something altogether different that Obama's self-indulgence to decide on giving life to a Downs child. What are Obama's values in this regard? It’s one thing to be pro-choice, but it’s altogether another to be for infanticide. I know Obama wants to ‘nuance’ his position on the matter, but allowing a born baby to die without medical assistance, (who managed to live in spite of the abortionist’s knife) is to me callous and devoid of compassion. Obama voted 4 times to prevent these innocent babies this care. Full term babies are subject to this horror. And the majority are normal or have minor problems like harelips or cleft pallets! The nurse who presented her findings to Obama, stated that he was ‘unfazed’ by the pictures and her description of a live baby thrown into the trash, and of her story of holding a dying baby for 45 minutes before he died, whom the doctors would not aid, to her disbelief and disgust. To Obama this is kosher. To me, and anyone else who has even the tiniest amount of compassion, Republican, Democrat or Independent, this is a diabolical horror. And as far as Palin's intellectual capacity goes, she is quick, articulate and smart. Do you really think she needs what most of the other politicians have: a law degree? Isn’t that part of the problem? George W. Bush has degrees from Harvard and Yale. George Washington had a mere elementary school education. Lincoln was a dropout. And so was Harry Truman. How would you rank those four presidents in terms of greatness or effectiveness? She'll make a great Vice-President (unlike politics as usual Biden) and in 8 years (YES 8 years - the actuarial life tables give McCain's life expectancy to be approximately 94 years!!! His mother is even 95!) she'll have the experience to lead the country as the first female President of the United States
Posted by Another Democrat voting for McCain-Palin, 29/09/2008 8:36:27 PM
People who genuinely dislike Sarah Palin simply shrug their shoulders and won't vote Republican. Those who make too much noise about her have only one reason to do so. They are scared of an Obama loss that Palin could cause. If indeed these noisy cynics are concerned of Sarah's gaffe's why do they not see Obama's and Biden's that, if carefully scrutinized, are worse than Palin's. Obama once forgot that Russia is a veto-wielding member of the UN Security Council. How on earth could he suggest that Russia's aggression against Georgia be resolved by the Security Council? That gaffe from, read, a presidential candidate seems inaudible to the biased media. And, who is Katie Couric anyway? Is she any better? And Gibson? If I were Sarah Palin I'd answer Gibson this way. "The Bush doctine is a so-called doctrine that George Bush himself doesn't know exist." If you think opinion-makers are any better, I suggest you'd better think twice.
Posted by Percy, 30/09/2008 1:56:34 AM
I have the greatest respect for what John McCain did during his Vietnam experience - it makes him a legitimate American hero. However, to put Gov. Palin in the position he has put her in makes me sad to think what it says about him today. Either desperation or the stress of time and experience has taken away the mental sharpness and judgement he must have once had. DrJ
Posted by DrJ, 30/09/2008 7:05:03 AM
< previous |  1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
DEBATE SHOWDOWN LOOMS: Sarah Palin
DEBATE SHOWDOWN LOOMS: Sarah Palin
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...