News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Is Palin losing her shine? 

Is Palin losing her shine?

29 Sep, 2008 05:03 PM
She arrived in a blaze of glory and at a stroke injected new life into John McCain's presidential election campaign like a dose of political viagra.

But one month after Sarah Palin was unveiled as the shock Republican vice-presidential pick, the surge of populist momentum provided by the Alaskan governor's elevation to national politics is waning, analysts say.

On Thursday, the photogenic 44-year-old mother-of-five faces the biggest test of her campaign so far when she goes head-to-head in a debate with her Democratic opposite number, the vastly experienced Senator Joseph Biden.

The showdown comes hard on the heels of a faltering performance in a prime-time television interview with CBS anchor Katie Couric last week, and at a time when even conservative commentators are questioning her credentials.

Professor Jack Citrin, professor of political science at the University of California Berkeley, said Palin had been remarkably successful in "mobilising and energising" support since her appointment, but interest was now cooling.

"She was an interesting new face in a kind of politics where celebrity, status and media attention is important," Citrin told AFP.

"Her views and self-presentation appeal to a component of the Republican Party coalition that were not so enthused about McCain.

"But the focus has turned now to figure out what she really knows and what she doesn't know, especially in the context of an economic crisis where people are anxious and alarmed," he said referring to the Wall Street meltdown.

Palin's interview with Couric -- only one of three the McCain campaign has granted to media since her unveiling -- reinforced scepticism surrounding the candidate's ability.

As well as stating -- without explaining how -- that Alaska's proximity to Russia had given her useful foreign policy experience, she said US forces had secured "victory" in Iraq, a bolder assertion than even McCain has offered.

Republican strategist Tony Fabrizio told Politico.com that Palin's interview was cause for concern. "You can't continue to have interviews like that and not take on water," he told the website.

The performance also drew a withering review from prominent pro-Republican columnist Kathleen Parker, who wrote in the National Review that Palin was now such an embarrassment to the party that she should step down.

"Palin's recent interviews with Charles Gibson (ABC News), Sean Hannity (Fox News) and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League," Parker said.

"As we've seen and heard more from John McCain's running mate, it is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem," she added.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp survey last week suggested that 49 per cent of voters believe Palin lacks the leadership qualities required in a president.

However, for some analysts, Palin's limited experience in foreign affairs is unlikely to affect her support among the rank-and-file Republican base, which responds to her staunchly conservative views on abortion, guns and religion.

"The party base doesn't care about foreign policy, so it should not be too much of a concern," said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political analyst at the University of Southern California. "But the media love affair is over."

And Jeffe said she believed it is doubtful that Palin may be able to attract undecided voters or former women supporters of defeated Democratic hopeful Hillary Clinton.

"There's no question she's injected the Republicans with an enthusiasm that John McCain could not," Jeffe said.

"Having said that, she hasn't been able to reach out to Hillary voters in any circumstance. And I think she's probably caused some of the independents and undecideds to think twice about her in the past couple of weeks.

"The polls now indicate that a majority don't think she's ready to be President. And that's not helpful."

Citrin meanwhile said McCain's advanced age -- at 72 he would be the oldest man ever elected to a first term as president -- meant more attention than normal was being paid to Palin's level of experience.

"Let's face it, you really don't need to know that much to be vice-president," Citrin said. "But when the president is a 72-year-old man the stakes are higher than they normally would be."

AFP

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
2

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Palin is testament to the kind of judgement John McCain offers America, indeed, the world. She is not qualified to lead the nation or serve as a leader in the world. The fact that McCain is old with multiple rounds of cancer and heart disease should immediately disqualify their candidacy. That it has not, and that McCain is running nearly even with Obama/Biden in the polls show how out of touch, stupid, or apathetic Americans truly can be. I am an American, proud of this fact too, but this election may very well serve as the tipping point for humanity. Speak up Australia and let your voices be heard!
Posted by Jeff - Oregon, 29/09/2008 2:28:13 PM
Obviously, if Mccain wanted to shock the country by choosing a woman VP, the choice whould've been Condoleezza Rice or even Dana Perino for that matter. Then the Mccain campaign could've had an justifiable back seat driver and given the american people a comparable choice. Instead I guess he thought that all the Clinton "female" supporters voted with their pu-nanny! And while it might be a totally feasable notion that men vote for certain things with their wang, I don't think this was the time to try to suggestivly demonstrate that. If the voters don't take notion an pay attention to what has or more than likely will happen and realize that the selection of Gov. Palin was a politcal mockery, our country will certainly face much more tramatic troubles than wall street and a competetive health care plan. In reguards to the Palin / Couric interview, I think what Gov. Pailin really meant to say (or should of said) in place of, "I"ll find out and get it to ya", is "I'M SARAH PALIN, AND IF YOU DON'T CHEW BIG RED THAN **** YOU!"
Posted by Eagle, 29/09/2008 3:15:49 PM
Greetings from Wash DC.. It's interesting how much interest the elections in the US gets worldwide attention. Sadly, the interest may qualify as almost morbid, with the John McCain camp bringing on perhaps the least qualifed person in American History to be a VP on his ticket. This woman has had wolves shot from aircraft and paid bounties when they turned in their front paw. She's taken $25,000 in gifts and ignored subpeonas in her state. She's basically a barbie doll being used to subvert the true point of being a candidate, and that's to distract us from McCains incredibly limited appeal to so many. He selected her based on a 5 minute meeting and a few quick phone calls. How many get hired for ANY job in 5 minutes? And the fact that McCain is OLD, and could easily become unable to serve or worse, could die while in office. This would leave this complete airhead as the President of the United States. This could reverberate around the world and simply scared the bejebbers out of me. If you know people in the US, tell them a vote for McCain is a vote for Caribou Barbie and implore them to not do it! The world can not afford John McCain's view of the world. He will drag everyone into war... Be very worried!
Posted by Expert47, 29/09/2008 3:18:13 PM
Sarah has never evolved beyond the publicity stunt that McCain needed. Sarah is snarky, sarcastic entertainment, a Joan Rivers, brought in to hopefully develop and entertain a swarm of giddy fans. Well, it worked...before it backfired. Sarah hasn't been anything more than Sen. McCain's grandstanding of the same type we saw with his 'campaign suspending.' Sarah has been fun entertainment. She needn't pretend to be more.
Posted by Leslie M, 29/09/2008 3:25:42 PM
Jeff , You are unkind and ufair. McCain's Mother is 96, he may live a long time. A person who has been ill has a right to live and prosper. God can heal any one. There is definitly a bigotry to your claims, it speaks of ageism as well as other prejudices. If you are for Obama you are out of touch he is an empty suit with good looks and empty words. He has never tried a case alone as a leader and cannot make a decision with out a team of advisers. Also although the Media and the rest of the world are dazzeld and fooled by Obama. Many of us in the USA are not. Go McCain Palin
Posted by Sandy, 29/09/2008 3:27:00 PM
Palin has been positioned as experienced given, as governor, she “ran” thinks as CEO of Alaska. That argument conflates running a corporation to running the executive branch of government. Under the American system, the legislative branch makes all laws, the executive branch executes the laws and the judicial interprets them. As a CEO, Steve Jobs serves at the pleasure of Apple’s board. If he’s got the board’s support, he doesn’t need senior management approval to launch a new product or take the company in a new direction. The President of the US – or a governor at the state level – has no such power. These executives can propose new laws, new policy, and new treaties, but, under the system of checks and balances, the President needs Congressional approval for them to be instituted. Isn’t that why we’re now seeing Paulson & Bernanke -- two executive branch officials -- urgently meeting with lawmakers? Only Congress can approve the funds and powers they are seeking. Senators in the process of making laws review in separate committee all matters of national importance. Some are briefed in classified intelligence. Is that not experience at the national level? What state official – at any level -- can make such a claim?
Posted by Kevin, 29/09/2008 4:08:21 PM
As a 43 year old (yes Palin's age) American woman of Irish decent who has visited over 20 countries (uh...not including "seeing Russia from my state"....) in her life as a military veteran of 20 years, I am amazed and appalled that I have more experience negotiating with foreign nationals than another who is running for VICE PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES. As an intelligent professional (communications engineer) I am embarrassed that one who believes the world is a few thousand years old, wishes to teach creationism in our schools, and supports banning books (really!) is even considered as second to lead our country. As a mother of two (not 5; I believe in birth control), I am jolted that one who recklessly brings more and more children into the world would be willing to mortgage her own children's future with increased national debt, decreased education and a dumbing down of America and total uninterest in her own children's education and well-being. Mostly I'm just humiliated that the country I love is seriously is offering up this person as an example of a qualified politician... woman... mother... patriot...person who could in any sense lead our country. I am so ashamed. My only hope is that there are enough smart people to see through the hype and through her silly American Idol Ass out on the Alaskan Tundra for time out and let her give her practiced lines while the real thinkers sort through our real issues and lead our country. God this woman scares me to death, and I don't scare easily.
Posted by tracyliz, 29/09/2008 4:20:36 PM
Sandy, God also sees all. I am Australian and my view of Obama is 1 of hard work and integrity. Technology/the camera is honest! Palin has demonstrated through the media in a small time frame that she is way out of her depth. I watched the debate between McCain and Obama live and I did not see any advisors assisting Obama, to me Obama had quick responses and his insight on all issues including your financial crisis was fully covered. Change is needed, McCain/Palin would be damaging to your economy and international political agenda.
Posted by JBP, 29/09/2008 4:32:39 PM
Sandy, you need to stop reading the right wing propoganda rags about Obama. He has had 12 years experience as a professor of constitutional law, 8 years in state congress in a state with 12 million people and then 4 years in federal congress. All of them have advisors, just that Obama's seem to have intelligence while McCain is the typical kneejerk reactionary who lies at every opportunity. Palin was a disaster from the moment she read a speech slamming Obama, a speech written for Leiberman. She is ignorant, foolish, thinks seductive is enough and not even poor Katie Couric could get a sensible answer out of her.
Posted by Marilyn, 29/09/2008 4:44:28 PM
"Palin's recent interviews with Charles Gibson (ABC News), Sean Hannity (Fox News) and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League," Parker said. /// The above comment is typical of the liberal bias of the media in America (in spite of the journalist's so-called Republican leanings). I suspect Parker aligns herself philosophically with, and votes for the candidate(s) rather than the party, which is completely the reverse of how it should be. The rest of this article is utterly disingenuous for failing to mention the Deomcrat's VP nominee. The gaffe-prone Joe Biden would be a disaster as VP. He makes Dan Quayle look like Winston Churchill.
Posted by Nick, 29/09/2008 4:48:02 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
DEBATE SHOWDOWN LOOMS: Sarah Palin
DEBATE SHOWDOWN LOOMS: Sarah Palin
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...