News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Labor takes Greens for granted: Seselja 

Labor takes Greens for granted: Seselja

20 Oct, 2008 04:01 PM
The Liberals will have "good faith" discussions with the Greens tomorrow about forming a minority government in the ACT.

After Saturday's general election, Labor and Liberal appear to have won seven seats - two short of an outright majority - in the Legislative Assembly with the Greens holding the balance of power with three seats.

The Stanhope Labor government has lost its majority hold over the assembly on the back of a nine per cent swing against it in the poll.

Liberal leader Zed Seselja said he'd had a conversation with the Greens lead candidate Shane Rattenbury.

"I'm not going to give away my negotiating position as this point," he told ABC Radio today.

"We'll negotiate in good faith, we'll negotiate responsibly."

The ALP had taken for granted the Greens would support a Labor minority government, Mr Seselja said.

"If the Greens do that, I suppose they will be sending out a clear signal that they're not a third force, they're simply an add-on to the Labor party.

"My discussions with Shane Rattenbury indicate he's not taking that approach."

Mr Seselja would not rule out offering the Greens a ministerial position in a Liberal minority government, but said it represented a challenge.

Negotiations could take two weeks: Brown

Taking a week or two to decide which of the two major parties forms a minority government in the ACT is a good investment in future governance, the Australian Greens say.

Neither the Labor government or Liberal opposition has won an outright majority in the 17-seat Legislative Assembly, while the Greens hold the balance of power with three seats after Saturday's general election.

The Greens federal leader Bob Brown said today the ACT community voted for minority government.

"The people of the ACT have said they don't want a majority government here, we want better outcomes and we'll do that by having a number of parties involved in the next government," he told ABC Radio.

Senator Brown said he hadn't discussed any "deal-breakers" with the three Greens MLAs elected on Saturday.

"I've discussed the process in the Tasmanian parliament where the Greens got better outcomes by being in the balance of power.

"It comes down to the Greens sensibly being able to get a good, comfortable arrangement in government."

It would take a week or two before an arrangement for government was agreed upon, Senator Brown said.

"But that is good investment in time when you're looking at the next four years of governance for the people of the ACT."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Typical arrogant Stanhope - saying that the people of Canberra had decided that they want the ALP to lead them for the next four years! What a joke - didn't he notice the 10% swing against Labor, or was he watching something different to the rest of us? Best he stick to buying sculptures, because his numeracy skills seem similar to those of the NSW Labor government!
Posted by Scotty, 20/10/2008 10:39:33 AM
Minister for the Environment, Shane Rattenbury - doesn't that have a nice ring to it!
Posted by Kevin, 20/10/2008 11:30:08 AM
Not that the Liberals are much better how arrogant is Smyth who could not concede that 3% swing against a party in opposition was not an electroral disaster. No wonder the minor parties attracted so many votes.
Posted by gab, 20/10/2008 11:30:24 AM
Looks like the first thing that's going to be on the negotiations table is business - will Greens stick by their election promise to stop the power station/data centre due to Stanhope's illegal move to put that business on Broadacre land? Labor has to save face over their mis-handling of it all and will try and make the Greens look bad with Chris Peters being in print this weekend and on radio this morning talking on this very point. Let's re-iterate, Liberals and Greens want business done properly - maybe the perfect match to be united in the face of the power station/data-centre debacle under Labor's leadership.
Posted by Digga, 20/10/2008 11:42:33 AM
As always, a vote for the Greens is a vote for Labour. The people who voted Green because they were sick of a Labor government just re-instated the joke they call Stanhope!!
Posted by Dave, 20/10/2008 11:56:03 AM
It must be clear to almost all that the people of Canberra voted for a Labor/Green 'coalition', or minority Labor government. Liberal/Green cooperation would infuriate most Green voters and take the Green cause back to their beginnings.
Posted by Eric, 20/10/2008 11:59:33 AM
Lets not forget Zed has had to turn the Liberal parties public perception around completely with only a few months to do that so a 3% swing for the party overall is not as bad as it could have been for the Libs.. With a couple more months of Zed that swing would have turned around !Stanhope himself who has had 7 years to prove himself to Canberra received a 15% swing against him and his party a 10% swing overall. Should the Greens reward that by allowing Stanhope to be re-elected? I dont think so, and I really wonder what the results may have been if Labor did not have so much money from their clubs to pump into election advertising! We may have ended up with a competent government we deserve instead of a Green Labor combination that looks like we will get! Lets hope Shane uses his Brain and favours the Libs instead of the Insane!!
Posted by CV, 20/10/2008 12:18:56 PM
It's clear to me of the stupidity of voters not thinking about the outcome of who they give their vote to. Now we're likely to be stuck with the arrogance of stanhope for another 4 years. His "victory speech" was a clear indication that not much will change, with his statement that the Greens would automatically support him on top of him claiming the electorate wanted him back because he got the most personal votes, when he's a distant 3rd behind Zed and Katy. We're heading towards being another NSW..
Posted by dave, 20/10/2008 12:20:27 PM
Dave, most people who usually vote Labor, but this time around voted Green, would not be impressed by your comments. Three Greens and seven Labor to seven 'Liberals' seems an ideal result - and I know many people who, for now, think similarly.
Posted by Eric, 20/10/2008 1:38:33 PM
If the Greens get into bed with Stanhope they will be rolled on every issue because they are philosophically a left-wing party and will be persuaded around to Labor's way of thinking on everything. If they get into bed with the Libs, their natural inclination on every issue will be to question their position and decide the issue on its merits - got to be a better outcome for the ACT than four more years of (effectively) Labor majority government. Greens! Get into bed with Zed!
Posted by Swinging Voter, 20/10/2008 1:38:38 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Liberal leader Zed Seselja
Liberal leader Zed Seselja

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
University of Canberra - click here
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...