News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Lesbians lose damages case 

Lesbians lose damages case

25/07/2008 11:19:00 AM
A lesbian couple have lost a landmark case in which they sued a Canberra obstetrician for the cost of raising one of their twins to the age of 21.

In the first case of its kind in Australia, the former Canberra couple sought more than $400,000 in damages from prominent obstetrician and gynaecologist Sydney Armellin after one of them was implanted with two embryos during an IVF procedure, when she only wanted one.

The ACT Supreme Court rejected the couple's claim yesterday and ordered them to pay Dr Armellin's legal costs.

The couple are considering an appeal.

The court heard that after the twins' birth, the mother had lost her capacity to love.

The couple, whose combined income is more than $100,000, sought $398,000 from Dr Armellin to cover the costs of raising one of the girls, including fees for a private Steiner school.

In July 2004, the now 41-year-old social research and planning consultant gave birth to two healthy non-identical twin girls. She told an ACT Supreme Court hearing before Justice Annabelle Bennett last year that the unwanted twin pregnancy had soured what should have been a joyous time.

She and her partner had planned to go to England after the birth, but their plans were scrapped when they discovered they were having twins.

Justice Bennett dismissed the couple's case on the grounds Dr Armellin had not acted negligently. She also ordered that a suppression order protecting the identities of the women, who now live in Melbourne, be lifted in 28 days, giving them time to lodge an appeal.

The judge found that it had been the system in place at the Canberra Fertility Centre at the time that led to two embryos being implanted when the birth mother wanted only one. Because only Dr Armellin was named as a defendant their case failed.

''It is to be applauded that the plaintiffs intend to support their children at that stage of their lives but it is not reasonable to ask Dr Armellin to pay for this additional support,'' Justice Bennett said.

The judge went on to say that had she found Dr Armellin to be negligent she would have awarded the couple $206,000.

In August 2003 the couple began in-vitro fertilisation treatment at the Canberra Fertility Centre, at John James Hospital, for which Dr Armellin was a consultant.

In September the birth mother signed a form consenting to the implantation of ''one to two embryos'', but was told by a nurse that she could change her mind ''up to and including the morning of the procedure''.

The centre tried unsuccessfully to contact the birth mother on the day before the procedure, and by the morning of the embryo transfer she had not told anyone at the centre about her wish to have only one embryo.

Moments before she went under general anaesthetic, she told Dr Armellin, who was supervising an embryologist implanting the embryos, that she wanted only one.

Justice Bennett found yesterday it was reasonable for Dr Armellin to believe that the centre already knew of the woman's wish to have only one embryo, and that she was confirming the instructions to him. As such, he had not breached any duty of care.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Thats silly. Dr Armellin is one of the best obstetrician's i know..heck i should know, he helped bring my 3 kids into the world ...
Posted by your welcome on 25/07/2008 8:15:38 AM
The Lesbians in Canberra who lost their case I say thank You Judge for rejecting the claim. What next ?Would lesbian cows be able to sue the veterinarians too ??? Kramilius Sydney
Posted by Kramilius on 25/07/2008 8:51:20 AM
Common sense prevails. (Not a frequent or predictable occurrence in Courts these days)
Posted by Voice of Reason on 25/07/2008 11:13:26 AM
Life is full of contingencies and twins occur in natural pregnancies. Any "loss of capacity to love" that the mother claims as a result of the birth of the twins should be treated like the post natal depression it obviously is symptomatic of. There are endless numbers of mothers who cannot conceive at all. Perish the thought that an IVF doctor can be sued for being too successful.
Posted by Anonymous on 25/07/2008 11:33:17 AM
What selfish women, the birth of your children were not soured by the fact that you were having twins, it was soured by your selfish desire to bring a child into the world without a father and then the fact that you would be relegated to a lower finacial social life because of the cost of raising two children. Get over yourself as a single mother I have and continue to raise three children on a $50,000 wage!
Posted by olivertwist on 25/07/2008 11:50:19 AM
Thank goodness for the decision. Imagine how those girls are going to feel when they're old enough to realise "Mummies" didn't want one of them! What will "Mummies" say when they ask was I the one you didn't want?
Posted by Mandy on 25/07/2008 12:02:49 PM
Appropriate outcome. This case is absurd. These women should consider themselves privileged to live in a society where there are services and facilities available for them to procreate! How dare they insult the system by suing for getting more than they asked for.
Posted by Nick on 25/07/2008 12:18:21 PM
How bloody ungrateful, the gift of life is priceless though through IVF it does cost some. The cost of raising children is not only a cost to your finances but also your independence, your social life and your mental health. If you don't appreciate what you have it is going to be a long haul for the next 20 years or more because having children is not all fun and games.
Posted by please Louise on 25/07/2008 1:20:50 PM
It is unfortunate that the sexuality of the parents is seen as relevant. As a lesbian I find it a sad affair and hope this case doesn't cause repercussions for other lesbian couples choosing to have children through the IVF program. To me the issue is about parents and their values principles and attitudes, regardless of their sexuality.
Posted by LW on 25/07/2008 1:36:59 PM
JUSTICE!
Posted by Francis White on 25/07/2008 2:25:06 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

12:15 PM AEDT | This week's YouTuber looks at a satire of George Bush's bailout plan, parodies of Sarah Palin and a dilapidated narrow walkway where only lunatics dare tread.
Yourguide to Your Toyota
Eurobodalla - search and book accommodation online
 
AIM 2020 Future of Leadership Convention
 
GOING PUBLIC - a conference for women in the publi
 
CPA Congress fresh thinking. real success.
 
Canberra Centre Magazine
 
Classifieds
 
CT Home Delivery
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...