News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Lesbians lose damages case 

Lesbians lose damages case

25 Jul, 2008 11:19 AM
A lesbian couple have lost a landmark case in which they sued a Canberra obstetrician for the cost of raising one of their twins to the age of 21.

In the first case of its kind in Australia, the former Canberra couple sought more than $400,000 in damages from prominent obstetrician and gynaecologist Sydney Armellin after one of them was implanted with two embryos during an IVF procedure, when she only wanted one.

The ACT Supreme Court rejected the couple's claim yesterday and ordered them to pay Dr Armellin's legal costs.

The couple are considering an appeal.

The court heard that after the twins' birth, the mother had lost her capacity to love.

The couple, whose combined income is more than $100,000, sought $398,000 from Dr Armellin to cover the costs of raising one of the girls, including fees for a private Steiner school.

In July 2004, the now 41-year-old social research and planning consultant gave birth to two healthy non-identical twin girls. She told an ACT Supreme Court hearing before Justice Annabelle Bennett last year that the unwanted twin pregnancy had soured what should have been a joyous time.

She and her partner had planned to go to England after the birth, but their plans were scrapped when they discovered they were having twins.

Justice Bennett dismissed the couple's case on the grounds Dr Armellin had not acted negligently. She also ordered that a suppression order protecting the identities of the women, who now live in Melbourne, be lifted in 28 days, giving them time to lodge an appeal.

The judge found that it had been the system in place at the Canberra Fertility Centre at the time that led to two embryos being implanted when the birth mother wanted only one. Because only Dr Armellin was named as a defendant their case failed.

''It is to be applauded that the plaintiffs intend to support their children at that stage of their lives but it is not reasonable to ask Dr Armellin to pay for this additional support,'' Justice Bennett said.

The judge went on to say that had she found Dr Armellin to be negligent she would have awarded the couple $206,000.

In August 2003 the couple began in-vitro fertilisation treatment at the Canberra Fertility Centre, at John James Hospital, for which Dr Armellin was a consultant.

In September the birth mother signed a form consenting to the implantation of ''one to two embryos'', but was told by a nurse that she could change her mind ''up to and including the morning of the procedure''.

The centre tried unsuccessfully to contact the birth mother on the day before the procedure, and by the morning of the embryo transfer she had not told anyone at the centre about her wish to have only one embryo.

Moments before she went under general anaesthetic, she told Dr Armellin, who was supervising an embryologist implanting the embryos, that she wanted only one.

Justice Bennett found yesterday it was reasonable for Dr Armellin to believe that the centre already knew of the woman's wish to have only one embryo, and that she was confirming the instructions to him. As such, he had not breached any duty of care.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I agree with all of you, but it has become a boon in disguise of curse. Now Hospitals have to start counselling before they go ahead with the IVF process. Well, not only IVF process, it applies to all fields as well. As long as the party is satisfied, the process should not take place. And it should be signed and agreed upon after thorough verification. Else, even the most reliable system will be blamed for giving a right or wrong justice to the right or wrong person. So all of us has got a new lesson to learn from this incident, Cheers!!!
Posted by Putuval, 25/07/2008 2:42:35 PM
Thanks goodness for common sense. That this case even saw the light of day in a court room says a lot about the laws in the ACT - change them! Dr Armellin is one of the most dedicated and hard-working people I have ever come across (delivered 4 of our babies) and I think it's ridiculous that his good name and reputation gets dragged through the mud nation-wide whilst the identities of the plaintiffs remains hidden. They want their privacy - where's Dr Armellin's? Is it any wonder that young, smart doctors are steering clear of obstetrics when they hear about court cases such as this.
Posted by Stu, 25/07/2008 2:53:19 PM
Great - people claiming 'wrongful' life in court. There have been other cases (in NSW) similar to this one: one where a woman underwent treatment that would 'probably' leave her infertile. She consented to the treatment and it's inherent risks. The procedure was successful, but 9 months later she pops out another kid. Instead of savouring this minor miracle of life, she (successfully) sues her OB-GYN and surgeon for the cost of raising her child. That sort of attitude is unacceptable, and a sign of Australian society becoming ever more litigious. And as doctors' insurance goes up, their fees go up, and private health insurance goes up. Thanks a lot.
Posted by heck, 25/07/2008 2:53:23 PM
I cannot believe these women. They should consider themselves lucky! I have a friend who is in her 8th year of trying for a baby through IVF. These women are ungrateful and undeserving of Dr. Armellin's skill in IVF. Dr Armellin is creating miracles for women who cannot concieve naturally and should be thanked for his efforts and work in this field!!! Im glad the ACT Court system through this out, it would be absurd for it to have gone any other way!! Keep up the good Work Doc.
Posted by Insulted!!, 25/07/2008 3:12:41 PM
I'ts hard to credit the monumental misunderstanding evident in the posts above. The case is not about the drivel cited but rather a series of medical and legal failures....to wit....the clinic advised that the decision on the number of embryos to be implanted could be amended at any time, the doctor ignored the instruction to implant only one embryo, and, on the basis of the judgement, the leagl team clearly failed the couple by confining the matter to the negligence of the obstetrician only. One can only hope that the parents will realise that doctors can't be beaten and lawyers meerly win for themselves.
Posted by opera44, 25/07/2008 4:20:57 PM
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that the motive here was the development of the child and not the social implications for the parents. If they were worried that having 2 children would not allow them to have enough control of the development of particular personality traits in their children - then I can tell them to quit worrying. They have a far better chance of getting the kind of child they want with 2 children! But the probabilities are still vanishingly small. My experience with my own children, and watching others, indicates that nature controls about 80% of the factors inherent in these outcomes. Most of us are taught by our children to sit back and enjoy the ride - those that don't suffer many disappointments. Acceptance, I think, is always the key.
Posted by long-time dad Giralang , 25/07/2008 4:28:35 PM
It's about time the govt introduced legislation to stop people litigating for everything they don't like which happens to them. It appears that there are some that expect financial compensation for any percieved injury or negative event in their lives. Money does not make you happy or change the past. Get on with your life it's the only one you'll get.
Posted by Stop silly litigation, 25/07/2008 7:01:57 PM
As a nurse that has worked with Dr Armellin over the last 5 years i've seen his dedication first hand and the respect and admiration he patients and nurses have for him. This is a man that always tries his hardest to find the best solution possible. Congrats to you Doc, fortunately your practice has not suffered as a result of this publicity, infact it's booming! Can't put a price on that advertising!
Posted by mydogisblack, 27/07/2008 1:58:37 PM
IVF and parenthood in general should be for heterosexual couples. The arrogance of this lesbian "couple" is beyond belief. If you want a homosexual lifestyle, don't be arrogant enough to deliberately deny children a normal set of parents.
Posted by Concerned Canberran, 28/07/2008 12:41:05 AM
I am so glad the two "loving mothers" lost this case. Perhaps having a child was just to accessorise their life/relationship and the fact they had twins ruined their ideal family image. children are a gift and should be accepted with joy and love. How will these little girls feel when they are old enough to understand that their mums only wanted one of them.
Posted by Canberra resident, 28/07/2008 12:25:56 PM
< previous |  1 | 2

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...