News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 New lake to flood out eagles 

New lake to flood out eagles

13 Aug, 2008 08:01 AM
A leading ecologist claims the ACT Government misled him over development plans for the Molonglo Valley when he was hired to provide an environmental assessment of the site.

University of New England bird expert Stephen Debus said he was not informed of plans to dam the Molonglo River and flood wedge-tailed eagle nests and habitat to form an artificial lake.

''If I had been told about the dam, I would have written a very different report,'' he said.

But a spokeswoman for the ACT Planning and Land Authority claims Dr Debus finalised his first report ''well prior to the technical reports that identified an online dam as a feasible option for stormwater management.''

Dr Debus, author of a field guide to Australian birds of prey, has accused the ACT Government of selectively cherry-picking science in the two reports he wrote to ''justify the proposed development or suggest minimal impact on raptors'' in the river valley.

In a six-page statement to be posted online later this week, he is urging Canberra residents to obtain his reports under freedom of information ''and compare what I said with what apologists for the development are saying''.

The ACT Government wants to build new suburbs to house up to 70,000 people in the Molonglo Valley area between Belconnen and Weston.

The Government has placed a 20-year moratorium on development in the central Molonglo region following community concerns over clearing of remnant native woodlands, but is currently considering a variation to the ACT Territory Plan so development can proceed in the eastern and western sections of the valley.

Dr Debus said his reports contained several warnings about the need to retain ''adequate foraging habitat around nest sites'' for birds of prey, but these were ignored by the ACT planning authority.

During his survey of the site, he was given the impression the Government ''was talking of building maybe a small pond to take some of the stormwater''.

Dr Debus said the Government ignored his recommendation for ''a much more in-depth study'' to assess the impact of the housing development on food sources and nesting sites of birds of prey across the region.

University of Canberra raptor ecologists Jerry Olsen and Esteban Fuentes surveyed the site in 2004 and were also not told of plans to dam the river.

Mr Olsen said, ''They kept it from us. The first we knew about it was from a glossy brochure in our letterbox.''

ACT Planning Minister Andrew Barr said the Government had ''no commitment'' to building a dam on the river.

''A lake is one of many water-management options under consideration. The Government has asked the Planning and Land Authority to undertake a thorough investigation of stormwater management options for the Molonglo.

''The analysis will include investigations from environmental, social and economic perspectives to compare the performance of these options. This information will inform the consequent environmental impact statement,'' he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
514 kangaroos died a tragic death at Belconnen near Molongolo to protect "endangered species" (even though cows, who have a grazing pressure 68 times bigger than kangaroos, were grazing on adjacent land). So much for the concern for "endangered species." It is now crystal clear that the government has only one concern - making money from housing. If it was half-way intelligent they might look at underground housing or building high rather than wide. Is there a movement to educate local Canberrans of these issues before voting time? Are the greens onto it?
Posted by menkit, 13/08/2008 5:51:09 PM
Why don't we engage in urban infill? That would solve the problems of encroaching on environmental areas, and provide housing for people in need of it, resolving the current housing shortage Oh, we can't have that, because of some silly urban plan devised a century ago.
Posted by Michael, 13/08/2008 2:58:08 PM
The scientists have forgotten the governing principle of the ACT - experts should be seen but not heard.
Posted by RN, 13/08/2008 1:21:50 PM
No development should proceed in the Molonglo Valley. It would make more sense to move to sensible higher density development - look to Europe (particularly Scandinavia) on how to build proper townhouses and appartments with adequate common parklands for residents - not the sort of stupidity happening in Civic currently.
Posted by Concerned Canberran, 13/08/2008 12:34:04 PM
Many submissions on the Molonglo development, I wrote one, identified the presence of a number of raptors in the Lower Molonglo, particularly Wedge-tailed Eagles. Submissions also highlighted the need to protect and restore the Lower Molonglo river corridor buffer, which planners appear determined to significantly reduce the size of in the original and, in spite of community objection, post consultation reports on the development. The Tasmanian Wedge-tailed Eagle is already a threaten species listed under the EPBC Act (1999) and the continued destruction of Wedge-tailed Eagle habitat across south-eastern Australia, will no doubt cause a decline in population. It is a protected species under the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act. To destroy its habitat or mate, remember they pair for life, may result in an eagle being unable to find a suitable relocation site due to their territorial nature and vigorous defence of territory. The Little Eagle was also declared vulnerable in March 2008 and, I believe, it is also present in the Lower Molonglo. The dam, intended to raise the sale price of land in public reports in the CT (so much for affordable housing), will completely destroy a significant area of habitat for Wedge-tailed Eagles and the encroachment of houses to within 300m is likely to drive out nesting pairs due to habitat disturbance of their hunting and nesting areas. This information has been known by planners for a long time, they have chosen to ignore the validity of it.
Posted by Anthony Green, 13/08/2008 12:25:42 PM
Who keeps voting Stanhope in? The guy is an embarassment and a fool - just like Andrew Barr. If you people keep voting him in you will be forever on the receiving end of his bungles. And while I'm on it, if 70000 blocks do become available they should be only available to ordinary citizens of the community and to people whom live in Australia- not builders, developers or overseas investors. THe builders and developers who keep ripping poor Canberrans off with way over priced housing. You can still have a house built in Victoria for $5000 pr square - Canberra is $17000 upwards using cheap materials. Absolutely disgraceful.
Posted by Jenny Gee, 13/08/2008 12:24:11 PM
Unfortunetely anonther example of the ACT government's practice of speciesism. They make many good decisions re homo sapiens but also not so good decisions when animals are in the way. I am one of the growing number of Canberrans who could not support such an anti wildlife government.
Posted by DW, 13/08/2008 12:14:15 PM
In answer to "fickel" I would like to remind the author that human impact has done a lot of damage to our environment in the past, and that is where we should leave it! I would like to believe that we have learnt by our past mistakes; that we will take more care to protect the environment that promises to protect us in the future.
Posted by coralie, 13/08/2008 12:02:34 PM
ACT Govt has done again !!! not listening to the concerns of the people, giving half baked information on future plans, Stanhope has no thought for wildlife in Canberra, Cangerra is a disgrace when it comes to saving natural habitiat for our wildlife!! Belconnen was a prime example and now its the Eagles, Why do politicions live in a sterile world without trees, bushland and the lives that lives within.
Posted by margaret, 13/08/2008 11:32:05 AM
Just exactly how many birds are we talking about? I think houses should have priority and am sure all of those against this development are already living in housing which damaged the environment??
Posted by fickel, 13/08/2008 11:18:32 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
FEATHERED FEARS: An expert claims wedge-tailed eagle habitats are under threat.
FEATHERED FEARS: An expert claims wedge-tailed eagle habitats are under threat.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...