News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Park fees a ticket to better transport 

Park fees a ticket to better transport

13 Apr, 2009 07:41 AM
Huge improvements to Canberra's public transport could be achieved at minimal cost with some white paint, existing computer software and funds from the introduction of paid parking at Russell Offices, a public transport advocate says.

Peter Moore, of the United International Public Transport Association, said all money collected from parking at Russell Offices and in the parliamentary zone should be committed to public transport.

Measures that would reduce bus travel time included priority at traffic lights, for which software had been available for years, and running buses in vacant lanes during peaks.

The inside lanes of Northbourne Avenue could be used for buses, running in the opposite direction to the rest of the carriageway.

This should be combined with free park-and-ride parking at Mitchell and Gungahlin for bus passengers.

Anticipating the ACT budget, Greens transport spokeswoman Amanda Bresnan said there must be a renewed commitment to improved public transport.

A rapid transit system should include improved bus services, links with taxis, bicycles and minibuses, and a modern ticketing system. ACTION hopes to introduce a new ticketing system next year.

Ms Bresnan said peak services should be extended past 6pm.

The ACT and Federal Governments acknowledge the link between increasing use of public transport and removing free parking at Russell and in the parliamentary zone.

But despite a recommendation in 2003 by a parliamentary committee that the National Capital Authority and the ACT Government prepare a detailed plan for paid parking in the zone, free parking continues.

A spokeswoman for the authority said the Federal Government had not advised a position on the recommendation.

It is estimated paid parking in these areas would raise up to $15million a year but Chief Minister Jon Stanhope has declined to commit this money to improving public transport.

For more, pick up a copy of today's Canberra Times

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Peter Moore from where? Google the United International Public Transport Association and you get nothing. Peter Moore should return to the public bus shelter from whence he came. The suggestion of paid parking at Russell and within the Parliamentary Triangle has nothing to do with improving public transport, but more to do with raising revenue - particularly when no guarantee is given that revenue raised will be dedicated to the cause of improving public transport. The likes of John Stanhope and others who advocate paid parking live in the luxury that they have their own (free) dedicated parking space within close proximity to their offices. These two clowns should try getting public transport to Russell. It's not that great when you have to go past Russell to Civic to catch a connecting bus back to Russell. ADFA and Campbell Park are no different. Granted some improvement needs to be made to the parking at Russell. They can start off by putting in gates on all bar 1 or 2 of the existing car parks and encoding the existing Defence pass so that only those who work at Russell park there. This will stop the Civic freeloaders from taking up the spaces. And to those to who ask why those who work at Russell should get free parking, should ask why anybody should not get access to free parking for work purposes. If I worked at Russell or anywhere in the Parliamentary Triangle, I'd be treatening stike action if they proceed with this 'initiative'.
Posted by PKA, 13/04/2009 10:01:01 AM
Minimum cost to whom? Obviously the government and not the couple of thousand people who park at Russell and elsewhere in the triangle with a fair proportion of them not working at Russell. If you doubt us watch how many people hope on the bus heading towards civic of a morning. We do need a better public transport system which would encourage people to leave their cars at home but this is not the answer. I would suggest removing the cross border fee that Deanne's and others have to pay would be a good start as to use public transport costs $15 a day so I, like many, chose to save money and drive.
Posted by Jabe, 13/04/2009 10:59:34 AM
"Huge improvements to Canberra's public transport could be achieved at minimal cost .." minimal cost to whom? It is a blatant tax grab aimed at workers, and continues the poor policy of paid parking. I remember when parking was free everywhere, covered by our existing rates and taxes. In the absence of a decent public transport system, and the distance from the outer suburbs to the areas of work, made travel by car almost mandatory. The rhetoric about paid parking being good for the environment and to use public transport is as hollow as it is ineffective.
Posted by Greg P, 13/04/2009 11:07:03 AM
Having a proper park and ride system integrated with buses is crucial. They could run a lot more buses to more work destinations if they had this. They also need park and rides at the eastern entrance to the city, as there's a huge number of Canberrans now living in Qbn and surrounds, and the roads in from the east are clogged. these commuters are going to keep driving and parking, unless a sensible and working park and ride is set up.
Posted by ant, 13/04/2009 11:27:00 AM
I work in the Parliamentary Triangle and if I have to pay for parking I'll try really hard to car pool. Buses are not an option because, part from the fact that they go around the world and sixpence, adding up to an hour on what would be a 20 minute car trip, it doesn't allow those of us with volunteer work commitments or needing to visit a supermarket on the way home the freedom to do so. I agree it's got nothing to do with the environment and all to do with revenue raising
Posted by mannie, 13/04/2009 11:58:05 AM
Running buses on the inside lanes of Northbourne Ave in the opposite direction to traffic flow is seriously dumb. It is clearly absolutely dangerous and typical of the line of thinking of this self styled "expert"
Posted by Michael, 13/04/2009 1:33:36 PM
Yep, Another brainstorm from Stanhope and Co. In line with the half a freeway, the prison which took ages to open and the data centre. I'm guessing that this parking initiative is already a done deal.
Posted by Pete, 13/04/2009 3:25:58 PM
give them a go they need the money to pay their advisers to show and tell them how to run the act government
Posted by nigel, 13/04/2009 8:28:23 PM
I'm just amazed that this matter continues to get any traction at all. Address the real traffic issues such as the GDE off ramps etc. We are a town of 340,000 approximately and it's high time we lived within our own means and not some else's grossly stupid pipe dreams. Frankly there's not much point in chest thumping over "huge improvements" to a public transport system that outside of work peak times and school runs might as well close down for a siesta.
Posted by Thaddeus, 13/04/2009 9:03:05 PM
when services at Russell are as good as what is available in Civic or another centre in the ACT I will be happy to pay for parking. This includes Postal services, Canberra connect, a selection of eateries, some retail, maybe a coles or woollies. Until then i would suggest Dear Leader Stanhope and his clowns go away and have a good hard look at themselves
Posted by jase, 13/04/2009 10:18:54 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Australian Running Festival

Feb Best Buys


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...