News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 PS has 'too many senior staff' 

PS has 'too many senior staff'

26 Nov, 2009 07:15 AM
The head of the public service's professional association says the federal bureaucracy wastes taxpayers' money by employing too many senior staff.

The Institute of Public Administration's national president, Andrew Podger, said a lack of central control over recruitment and industrial relations had allowed ''classification creep'' to spiral out of control.

''We have an extraordinary number of deputy secretaries in some of our departments,'' the former departmental head and public service commissioner said yesterday.

''And it's not just that we're overpaying them and it's costing a lot of money.

''We crowd out the work for people down the line.

''You won't develop people if you don't give them responsibilities.''

The senior executive service grew by almost 40 per cent in the 14 years to 2008, rising from 1857 permanent officers to 2692.

But while most agencies managed with one to three deputy secretaries SES band-3 officers 12 agencies employed at least five.

The relatively small Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade employed 15 band-3 executives last year, most on salaries well over $200,000.

Treasury, which had only 973 permanent staff, had nine executives at deputy secretary-level, while the Australian Taxation Office, with a staff almost 25 times larger, employed just one.

A government discussion paper on the public service, issued two months ago, also identified the decentralisation of pay policy as a possible barrier to bureaucrats' mobility and development.

The paper, written by an advisory group headed by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet head Terry Moran, says the lack of a bureaucracy-wide pay classification system has caused ''growing disparity in remuneration levels across the APS''.

Mr Podger, who addressed a group of senior executives hosted by legal firm Deacons yesterday, warned far fewer graduates would enter the job market in 10 years time.

He said the public service needed to try harder to attract and keep the best workers.

''If you push all of the work up to the senior levels, you really are undermining professional development.

''Why are we doing it? ... Ministers and their staff like to have all those senior people. It doesn't actually help, but they think it does.

''We've got to work out a way to resist some of that.

''So let's go back to what is actually cost-effective and sensible for now and into the future.''

Public submissions to Mr Moran's public service review close on Monday next week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I agree 100% they need to recruit more graduates, junior level employees to replace aging PS. The working environment condition for APS1-6 need to be given more responsibilites. power to make decision.
Posted by simon, 26/11/2009 7:37:54 AM, on The Canberra Times
No kidding? Ask ANY APS6 or below, theres WAY too many EL+ levels in the PS. Theres next to nothing left for APS staff to do. Not to mention underqualified, overpaid contracters and admin staff, receptionists who cant call people for you, EAs who cant book meetings, Project officers who cant use Word... wasted staff and money everywhere.
Posted by APS Joke, 26/11/2009 8:50:46 AM, on The Canberra Times
Also - it seems like everyone is a "manager" even though though they done manage anyone......
Posted by Peter, 26/11/2009 1:09:09 PM, on The Canberra Times
Me'thinks he does protest too much. The real issues for the record. APS training at abinitio and middle level managment has dropped off over two decades to a simpletons suite of short courses by private providers. The APS has been de-skilled. APS structures have been pruned of the second-line of management and planning - the second in commands. With Executive culture driven by meetings rather than effective information exchange - writing - an SES fights hard to get any real productive desk time; hence they have to bring in "guns for hire", like me, to complete planning, policy and research tasks that would be clearly inscope for senior subordinate staff, if they had been adequately trained and mentored. The APS is inherently more complex now than 5 years ago and the APS still lags in developing corporate skills amongst it's lower and middle ranks. So rather than a CEO risking success on material developed by internal staff, they place senior proven staff to deliver on capability. How many agencies have a DCEO or ASEC who literally provides a one person capability for the agency? So before Andrew Podger perpetuates low cost labour, he must balance the APS.
Posted by Paul D. Patti, AFAIM, 26/11/2009 1:34:25 PM, on The Canberra Times
i could comment, but I better not.
Posted by Polytechnic Boy., 26/11/2009 1:42:19 PM, on The Canberra Times
It seems that senior managers only trust the advice of those they pay a lot - hence the reliance on high-cost consultants and contractors. Advice from internal sources, particularly those at the coal-face seems to have no value.
Posted by Retired (& relieved), 26/11/2009 4:59:42 PM, on The Canberra Times
It doesn't take much brain to work that one out. You don't need a Commission to do that, just ask most public servants. The only ones who'd be against it would be the overpaid underworked public service executives.
Posted by Suzie, 26/11/2009 7:24:48 PM, on The Canberra Times
It would be great if the public service could also get rid of the staff who don't pull their weight (including much of the senior management).
Posted by MadScientist, 26/11/2009 7:54:34 PM, on The Canberra Times
The bigger problem is the number of inexperienced people at pretty high APS and EL levels. Most graduates now reach the APS level within about 2-3 years of joining the public service, and some of them are EL1s by the 3 year mark. This presents a real problem, as enthusiasm and intellect is not the same thing as experience. And further, it is impossible to keep the grads for any decent length of time as they will simply seek and gain promotion somewhere else. Consideration shoud be give to centralised recruitment and minimum periods that people must spend at certain levels before gaining promotion.
Posted by you are missing the bigger problem, 26/11/2009 10:32:34 PM, on The Canberra Times
The underlying problem is the APS culture. Anybody with initiative soon becomes frustrated by the 'not in my duty statement', risk averse attitude, particularly in the lower and middle ranks. Efficiency and attitude could be improved by removing the concept of permanency, and introducing three and five year performance based employment contracts for all staff. And why pay isn't docked for the non productive smokers who loiter outside offices for up to 2.5 hours per week never ceases to amaze me.
Posted by Themis, 27/11/2009 8:41:32 AM, on The Canberra Times
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

University of Canberra Arts-Design



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...