News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Rush to flood ACT with units 

Rush to flood ACT with units

29 Jul, 2010 12:00 AM
The territory's chief planning executive, Neil Savery, is warning developers attempting to cram too many units on land in older Canberra suburbs to forget it they won't get their plans approved.

The warning coincides with a surge of development applications in at least 11 Canberra suburbs, where developers are proposing to demolish homes to make way for clusters of five, 10 and up to 31 units.

While the ACT Planning and Land Authority will reject over-scaled or poor quality designs, it's also preparing discussion papers on increasing housing density in certain precincts.

''Because there is no question, Canberra can't continue to just expand at the edges,'' Mr Savery said.

Under proposed new change-of-use fees, developers could pay up to $70,000 a unit or more for redevelopment of infill sites, which has sent some into a panic, prompting new applications to avoid the rise.

In one proposal opposite Griffith shops in Stuart Street, five brick and tile homes will be demolished to make way for 31, one-bedroom and two-bedroom units. While declining to comment on the application, the proponent says this application was not triggered by the looming fee increase.

Two homes will be demolished in Cook for 10 town houses. In Deakin, two homes will be demolished for five town houses and basement garage and in Dickson, two homes will go to make way for 12 units.

Similar developments are proposed at Holder, O'Connor, Pearce, Turner, Wanniassa and Yarralumla. At Narrabundah, a church and two residences will be demolished to make way for 23 new units.

An architect awaiting planning approval said people had panicked thinking they would not make enough money to justify a redevelopment under the new fees structure.

ACT Treasurer Katy Gallagher sought to calm a property industry lunch gathering last week, saying the Government would not introduce a system that would stifle or stop development. She said a final report on codification of the fees was almost complete.

Controversy surrounding the proposed Hawker redevelopment and Brumbies' proposal for redeveloping Griffith Oval showed how hard urban infill was to achieve.

For more, pick up a copy of today's Canberra Times

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well, if councils planned properly in the first place, all suburbs, even the brand new ones, would have a mix of all styles of houses. Instead all the suburbs that have been built in the last 20 years are full of houses and decidedly lacking in townhouses and units. The only way to fix this problem is for developers to knock down houses and build what should have always been there. Btw, its also an easy way to solve affordability.
Posted by Jane, 29/07/2010 8:16:44 AM, on The Canberra Times
High government fees and a lack of available land for development, both on the city fringe and because of NIMBY pressure on natural urban infill is making Canberra unaffordable. Moves to slug developers with higher fees will only add to the cost. People in this town already have to pay $400+ each week in rent for the privilege of a roof over their heads. The Stanhope Labor government and their Green accomplices like to portray themselves as caring fuzzy protectors of the "poor". In reality they are running the poor out of town with their housing policies.
Posted by BabySunshine, 29/07/2010 9:07:08 AM, on The Canberra Times
The problem is ... people. Too many people. Most problems are caused by people and the less people the fewer problems. People caused the environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico because of their insatiable thirst for oil. The expanding population of the ACT is resulting in houses being replaced by units. But Jon Stanhope wants a bigger population for the ACT. It necessarily follows that we'll get more problems too because problems not only follow people - people are the problems!
Posted by Paul Neri, 29/07/2010 9:21:21 AM, on The Canberra Times
This is the result of Jon Stanhopes desire for a bigger population. A population that will supposedly result in a more liveable city. Well the result is that no-one will be able to afford to live in a detached house with a garden. Instead we will become a city of unit dwellers. So much for bush capital. The Greens are as bad as Labor on this issue. Failing to stand up against rampant population growth fuelled by unnecesary skilled migration.
Posted by Greg, 29/07/2010 10:00:07 AM, on The Canberra Times
Actually the biggest problem in canberra is the complete lack of affordable houses or flats, this has been acheived by the governemnt not releasing the land. There is no way that you can convince me that a 2 bedroom flat in canberra is worth 300K plus
Posted by Greg, 29/07/2010 10:04:55 AM, on The Canberra Times
More units is better for the environment. It makes public transport viable. It means we take back less land from the environment.
Posted by Eric, 29/07/2010 10:19:18 AM, on The Canberra Times
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out what is going on.... The ACT Gov and developers are greedy; small blocks mean more blocks per acre, which equals more rates and stamp duty. If you live in Gungahlin you drive past sheep and cows on your way to work, so land shortage my astrolab...
Posted by Ivan, 29/07/2010 10:34:36 AM, on The Canberra Times
Why is it when the ACT plans to grow we get an uproar ,and it sends me deaf,and at the same time Queanbeyan trumpets and screams from the rooftop it want's to go to 70,000 plus, not a sound.There is no need for Qbn to expand, it is not the National Capital,just a hang on. Double standards here folks.
Posted by Ginger of Conder, 29/07/2010 11:22:36 AM, on The Canberra Times
As a city grows (and in Australia that is what our citys are doing due to our growing, changing country) there will be need for more housing and townhouses and apartments in the inner suburbs are a good idea as that is where people want to live, otherwise it just drives up house prices even more! Why do we need Canberra/Queanbeyan to grow? Because we have jobs to fill! because our children need a future here! with jobs! schools! hospitals! We need to dense up Canberra and therefore be able to provide more services to areas...
Posted by Jman, 29/07/2010 11:55:20 AM, on The Canberra Times
Urban infill will alleviate the housing shortage. However this has to be done so as to respect the Garden City plan that Canberrans have enjoyed and taken for granted. Urban infil has to be LOW density ( ie dual occupancy in the form of detached housing per block of land ) to respect and maintain this Garden plan.The current rush of EXTREMELY high density development has no place in this plan . ( eg 8 units in 2 blocks of land ) This high density does not conform to the streetscape and the Scale is completely out of character with surrounding neighbours. Better if ALL Canberrans acknowledge the housing shortage and be responsive to this need for urban infil by allowing dual occupancy to ALL residential zones and not just to RZ2 zones . By doing so we ALL share the the burden and can continue to enjoy the suburban landscape that we have taken for granted.
Posted by colin, 29/07/2010 12:47:58 PM, on The Canberra Times
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Given the current housing shortage, do you think high density urban infill is appropriate for Canberra?




Most popular articles

Canberra Times Fun Run
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...