News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 School-waggers will still get their fill of chicken 

School-waggers will still get their fill of chicken

10 Sep, 2010 09:53 AM
Students skipping class can still buy food at a Canberra chicken takeaway as the owner won't deny them a right to service.

School-wagging pupils have ''a right'' to be served, says Kingsley Varr, owner of Kingsley's Chicken.

He says a sweet drink might save a student's life, even if they are cutting class.

Kingsley's Chicken in Conder was approached by local school principal Bill Thompson, who asked the shop to stop serving students between 9am and 3pm.

Mr Thompson said Lanyon High School's 640 pupils are just 500m away from the ''temptation'' of shops at Lanyon Marketplace, Conder.

The teacher of 32 years and his staff are often at the shops herding small groups of students back into the playground.

The principal said it was the law for children younger than 17 to be in school or at training and shop owners who served students in school hours were ''aiding truancy''.

At least seven businesses selling food nearby have promised to do their best to stop serving to truant pupils, but Kingsley's Chicken has refused.

Mr Varr said refusing service could be legally dangerous.

''The questions raised in not serving any customer could lead to exposure to other legal and ethical consequences, [for example] a diabetic child who needs a sweet drink as a matter of urgency [and] who is refused and dies,'' Mr Varr wrote.

''Perhaps in future some government agency will request us to ask all adults if they are on a sickie from work.

''Where do we draw the line and require people to take charge of their own lives?"

For more on this story, including the response of Education Minister Andrew Barr, see the print edition of today's Canberra Times.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Anyone else think this is going to far? All Bill Thompson was after was a community to work together to support each other. This isn't about children, this is about money.
Posted by Nat, 10/09/2010 10:38:37 AM, on The Canberra Times
Shame on Mr Varr for using diabetic children as a means to excuse his lack of support for Mr Thompson's simple request. Parents and schools have medical plans in place for each child affected by a chronic illness. During school hours the best place for an affected child is to be at school where the appropriate medical attention can be given. As a community we should be supporting each other and this includes the staff who teach our children. Shame on you Kingsleys for not supporting this worthwhile initiative.
Posted by suze, 10/09/2010 1:27:46 PM, on The Canberra Times
I agree that the community has its role to play however how is it that no one is questioning why the students are regularly outside the school during school hours? The school staff and the parent body need to get together and develop some effective and meaningful consequences for these truants.
Posted by Liz, 10/09/2010 1:28:58 PM, on The Canberra Times
Nat I must disagree. How about the school takes some responsibility here rather then "encouraging" shop owners to act as Truancy police. How about they patrol the perimiter of the school during breaks and take rolls during class to see who is absent. And here is something novel - punish the kids who break school rules. And if it is against the Law for a 17yo to be out of school enforce the law.
Posted by concerned, 10/09/2010 2:28:42 PM, on The Canberra Times
What a poor response from the food seller. All he is being asked to do is to act like a community-minded businessman and help address a growing problem. Far-fetched examples do little to aid his credibility. Like the previous writer said, it's about profit, not consideration of others. I know one business that I and my family will stop going to, now that I've read this article.
Posted by Claude, 10/09/2010 2:45:53 PM, on The Canberra Times
I agree with 'concerned'. Also, how about the parents stop giving their children disposable amounts of pocket money. No money equals less likely to head to the shops in the first place. Parents need to take more responsibility.
Posted by MsCapri, 10/09/2010 7:22:01 PM, on The Canberra Times
I think the shop owner's response is really selfish. I, for one, will be boycotting his shop from now on.
Posted by mike, 10/09/2010 9:04:54 PM, on The Canberra Times
Come on, this is just silly. The shop owners are just doing their jobs and earning their livelihoods - if the school is so worried they should do something about it themselves.
Posted by CM, 10/09/2010 9:56:19 PM, on The Canberra Times
Good on you Mr Varr, you are a shining example that corporate greed is still alive and well in the ACT.
Posted by School Worker, 11/09/2010 12:39:05 AM, on The Canberra Times
The shop owner is 100% correct. This skipping school or classes is a matter entirely between the school,student and the students parents.
Posted by dusty, 11/09/2010 12:49:59 AM, on The Canberra Times
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

LJ Hooker CIty

Feb Buy Smart
 
Feb Best Buys


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...