News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Stanhope faces hospice anger 

Stanhope faces hospice anger

13 Nov, 2009 08:11 AM
Outraged community members took Chief Minister Jon Stanhope to task last night over the proposed privatisation of Clare Holland House.

Mr Stanhope and Little Company of Mary chairman Tom Brennan faced an agitated crowd, largely made up of palliative care volunteers.

The public meeting at Ainslie Football Club was the final stage in the ACT Government's public consultation process surrounding the proposal to buy Calvary Public Hospital from the Little Company of Mary for $77million and sell the company the palliative care facility, Clare Holland House, for $9million. And the public wasted no time in getting their final thoughts to MrStanhope and Mr Brennan.

They fired passionate questions to both men and muttered their discontent when unsatisfied with some answers.

One woman demanded to know why Mr Stanhope found a question so hard to answer. Some audience members became too angry to wait for the microphone and leapt to their feet to speak.

Mr Stanhope was asked if the sale of Clare Holland House was to ''sweeten the deal''. He said it was not, but instead part of a ''broader negotiation''.

Asked if the ACT Government would consider splitting the sale of Calvary from the buying of Clare Holland House, he said the ACT Government would, but the Little Company of Mary would not.

Mr Brennan said the Little Company of Mary did not ask the hospice be part of the transaction, the ACT Government did.

According to Mr Stanhope, the sale of the palliative care facility would not impact on the care offered. What would change overnight?

ACT Palliative Care Society patron, Shirley Sutton, said the difference was it would no longer be a community facility. The sale of the hospice would reduce the Government's control over palliative care. For it to be in private hands would be a ''negative step''.

ACT Palliative Care Society member, Peter O'Keefe, said the hospice was nearly unique in the world.

Almost everywhere else, hospices were churches, businesses or charities.

''In 1995, Canberra opened a hospice. The community said dying should never be a matter of charity, churches or profit,'' he said. ''We own our own hospice because we wanted it that way. And it's up for sale.'' To Mr Stanhope, he said, ''It's our institution, Jon. Not yours. You haven't the right to sell what's ours.''

He concluded his speech to a standing ovation.

According to audience members, far from things not changing, things had already changed. Staff and volunteers were ''demoralised'' and ''upset'' and symbols of other religions such as Judaism and Buddhism had been removed. They wanted to know as the status quo had appeared to work, why change?

Mr Stanhope restated his stance that things would not change. The palliative care service would go from being a fully-funded service in a Government building to a fully-funded service on private land.

And Mr Brennan promised the Little Company of Mary would invest in quality research and teaching in palliative care in Canberra should the sale go ahead.

Society president David Lawrence concluded by demanding consultation be extended so the community could better understand the complex issues involved.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Most will think that the side-deal was cynically prearranged between the parties. The government considers itself above the 'community' or the 'electorate', which isn't really part of this equation.
Posted by Stephen, 13/11/2009 9:01:20 AM, on The Canberra Times
I don't really care for the sale, one way or the other but isn't Clare Holland House already managed by Calvary? What would change in terms of it's management?
Posted by Thomas, 13/11/2009 10:28:20 AM, on The Canberra Times
At this forum, John Stanhope kept asking - "what will change at the hopsice if it was sold tomorrow." Well: 1. a lot of staff will leave because they want to remain public servants under public awards, 2. The hospice will have difficulty attracting staff from the public sector 2. there will be no checks and ballances on the catholic influence which are currently provided by the public staff and the public ownership 3. there will be a catholic monopoly on palliative care in the ACT for many years 4. the government will effectively lose control over palliative care in the ACT 5. palliative care services in the ACT will become less integrated with the public system Is that enough or do you want me to continue. Not happy John. Don't sell our Hospice.
Posted by Don't, 13/11/2009 11:57:15 AM, on The Canberra Times
What I want is a guarantee that Jon Stanhope will put something into law, that will outlast "his/our" government's current term and will ensure that there cannot be a change of lease purpose clause. I am not so worried about the sale of the bricks and mortar from one palliative care provider to another as long as the lease purpose clause ensures the site's future use for palliative care only.
Posted by NormC, 13/11/2009 2:45:17 PM, on The Canberra Times
Thomas, part of the problem is that so few people really understand the situation. It is true that Clare Holland House (CHH) is managed by Calvary, or at least by the Little Company of Mary (LCM). But the public owns the building and the staff are public servants covered by public system awards and conditions. If LCM take over CHH staff will be forced to choose between staying with ACT Health and moving to one of the hospitals or staying at CHH and moving to a private award. Despite all the assurances there is enough history to suggest conditions will deteriorate, staff will be disadvantaged, services will not grow, and all for the sake of a few bucks to boost the ACT Govt coffers (and they also have history that shows good management (just a hint of sarcasm here)). Apart from very little public scrutiny there is the feeling that this is a done deal as Stephen mentions. Stanhope was suspiciously evasive at this meeting and was continually asked to 'answer the question', which he failed to do. No wonder morale is dropping at CHH.
Posted by Max, 13/11/2009 3:45:09 PM, on The Canberra Times
If the Catholics are so keen to have a hospice i the ACT then why can't they go and build one?
Posted by olfella, 13/11/2009 4:11:33 PM, on The Canberra Times
Don't. Who manages the Hospice at the moment. And if it is managed by Little Company of Mary don't they manage it with a catholic influence. As to your other points: 1. on what basis do you believe a number of staff will leave? Are conditions that bad in a private company compared to ACT Health? 2. Why will they have dificulty in attracting staff. I would think that certain people really care and enjoy working in that environment4 If the government loses control aren't they able to open a hospice in the future. Oh no they probably can't afford that or staff it. so yes i would like you to go on
Posted by concerned, 13/11/2009 4:50:35 PM, on The Canberra Times
Concerned. Yes, the Little Company of Mary manages Clare Holland House at the moment but their influence is limited to a pelthora of Catholic symbols and compulsory religous education for middle managers. While the staff are currently expected to work under the LCM mission and, more significantly, under the Catholic Health Australia Code of Ethics, most don't - it is not a factor in clinical practice. The LCM does not push the code of ethics at the moment precisely because it is a public building with public servant staff operating a public health service. But once they own the staff and the building, there is great concern that the Catholic influence will increase dramaticaly. Why should a non catholic patient have decisions about their health care made using a catholic ethical model? It is not appropriate in a public funded health service. Re staff leaving and difficulty with recruitment, I need to protect my sources but I do know that it has been made very clear that a large number, including many senior staff, would seek alternative employment if the sale goes ahead.
Posted by Don't, 13/11/2009 8:56:33 PM, on The Canberra Times
Get the money and build another monument to "no hope". Sell the farm as the saying goes. All this arty farty stuff is a waiste of money, no wonder no one wants to come here.
Posted by Noel, 14/11/2009 9:25:41 AM, on The Canberra Times
I worked for Calvary in Canberra a couple of months back. I'm not a particularly religious person, at all, but I actually found the hospital's values about respect and stewardship quite refreshing at a middle management level.
Posted by noncatholic, 14/11/2009 4:36:34 PM, on The Canberra Times
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Supporters give Peter O'Keefe a standing ovation. Photo: GRAHAM TIDY
Supporters give Peter O'Keefe a standing ovation. Photo: GRAHAM TIDY

Most popular articles

Australian Running Festival

Feb Best Buys


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...