News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Sun King casts shadow on solar solution 

Sun King casts shadow on solar solution

29 Jul, 2008 10:40 AM
The Rudd Government's decision to means test the solar panel rebate could destroy Australia's fledgling solar energy industry, China's richest man solar billionaire Zhengrong Shi has told a Senate inquiry.

Known as the ''Sun King'', the former University of NSW engineer and senior research scientist now heads a Shanghai-based global solar empire worth $7.6 billion.

His company Suntech, which started in 2001 with backing of $US6million ($A6.3 million) from Chinese investors after failing to attract Australian Government support, is now the world's largest photovoltaic manufacturer.

It employs 8000 people, has grown at an annual rate of 227 per cent in the past three years, and is the solar energy provider for the ''Bird's Nest'' stadium at next month's Beijing Olympics.

Dr Shi has described the Federal Government's recent decision to impose a $100,000 means-test threshold on the $8000 rebate for solar panel installation as arbitrary, unjustified and an unnecessary invasion of privacy.

''The means test will only slow down the goal of the rebate to further develop clean energy and assist solar power to reach grid parity ... [it] is contradictory to the Government's commitment to renewable energy as a major element in the fight against climate change,'' he said.

It would also act as a disincentive, creating fears about the security or unauthorised use of private income details recorded on databases.

In a written submission to a Senate inquiry into solar rebate protection, Dr Shi said the Australian arm of his company, Suntech Power Australia which was established in December last year, fully supported proposals to ''bring solar to low-income households, but via a different avenue than a means test''.

The Senate's environment committee is investigating the impact of the Rudd Government's 2008-09 budget decision to limit eligibility of the $8000 solar panel installation rebate to households earning less than $100,000 a year.

The inquiry has already received 130 submissions, with most calling for the means test to be scrapped.

But Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan has emphatically ruled out any review of the decision. Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett has also defended the means test, claiming that solar has not ''suffered as a consequence of our action because this Government has produced more support for solar than any other government''.

Dr Shi has urged the Government to create a separate direct assistance program, similar to one already operating in California, to help low-income residents switch to solar photovoltaics without increasing monthly expenses.

''We understand the budgetary circumstances that led to the introduction of the means test. We support the Government's effort to curb inflation and put downward pressure on interest rates.

''However, we are concerned that the means test has the potential to undermine the success of the rebate program and the growth of Australia's solar industry,'' the Suntech submission says.

It argues that solar panel rebate recipients ''are the pioneers in our renewable energy sector'' and are helping transform the market and make solar energy systems more affordable.

''The solar rebate was not designed as income assistance, or social security measure. The purpose of the rebate was to offset the start-up costs of installing a power system, thereby encouraging Australian home owners to invest in solar technology.''

Dr Shi, who developed many of his solar thin-film technology patents while working at the University of NSW, remains an Australian citizen. His global solar fortune has made him Australia's fourth-richest man, and The Guardian newspaper recently named him among ''50 people who could save the planet''.

About 10 per cent of Suntech's sales are to China, with 80 per cent of solar products going to Europe, particular Germany.

During numerous recent public talks, Dr Shi has repeatedly stressed solar power ''and other alternative energy is definitely the answer to sustainable development of human life, especially to resolve global warming''.

In Melbourne yesterday, the Senate inquiry also heard evidence from Victorian secretary of the Electrical Trades Union, Dean Mighell, who was expelled from the Labor Party.

In a written submission, Mr Mighell said growth in uptake of solar energy had sparked interest among registered electrical contractors to invest in expanding their training to establish new solar installation businesses.

As a result of the means test, more than 50 per cent of jobs had been cancelled because people could no longer afford to install photovoltaic panels.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I sometimes wonder why we bothered to kick out the Howard government - all enthused as we were - with the prospect of the new Labor government tackling global warming. Australia, once a leader in solar technology, suffered over a decade of climate change denial by its government, with policy directed by the fossil fuel lobby. At least we knew that renewable energy had no hope under the Howard government. Now - we're lulled into thinking that things have changed. But have they? With Swan, Ferguson, and that sad disappointment, Garret, in charge - Labor "support" for renewable energy looks like hypocrisy. Very disappointed - Kevin - very much 07, not 08. Christina Macpherson www.antinuclear.net
Posted by ChristinaMac, 29/07/2008 10:35:09 AM
Early Adopters of new technologies, are the people with higher incomes, these people allow new businesses to get a solid foundation, which drive down the costs for everyone else. Cutting the rebate for solar installations for high income earners, shows the government isn't serious about getting renewable energy into the mainstream or supporting the small businesses trying to branch out into this area. Also people with this rebate are likely to get far bigger solar installations installed, producing a net excess of power, reducing emissions for the community as a whole.
Posted by Damian C, 29/07/2008 11:18:35 AM
Looks like the 'new' labor govenment has feet of clay re new technologies. What about the investment in the future .... some people have short memories. Its looking more and more like a one term Government unless its starts to get real with its voters Also how about getting china and India to commit to global C02 reductions or this just an excuse to raise taxes ?
Posted by Jake the Peg, 29/07/2008 12:49:41 PM
I vote Green, and while I was relieved to see the Howard Government, full of its denials and excuses, exit stage ultra right, the arrival of Labor has only confirmed that neither of the major parties Get It. They live in the age of industry. The world has changed, and they are slow to grasp it. Climate change is an opportunity to re-engineer our economy and bring it efficiencies undreamed of twenty years ago...er, except by the green movement. Rudd should find a nice way to save face, and abolish this silly means test.
Posted by Adrian Glamorgan, Perth, 29/07/2008 1:42:17 PM
Dissapointing the Government I helped to elect - for what I believe was the right reasons for this country and it's future - has this myopic outlook. I just hope it has the guts to be bold and not to be coersed by the oil industry. We need support, leadership and action now, not when its too late.
Posted by Sheepy, 29/07/2008 2:00:35 PM
Current solar energy systems have to be big to supply all needs for a typical household now. Solar power connected to the grid is cheaper but if the grid goes down you're f****d. A big enough stand alone system can cost around $30K after rebates. Prodding the industry into catching up might be a better idea.
Posted by hoi, 29/07/2008 4:45:22 PM
Perhaps we need something like this while we are waiting: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/06/27/1963676.htm .. a bit cheaper. Must say, though, after 11 years of Howard government, I feel we've done enough waiting already.
Posted by Steve W, 29/07/2008 8:19:51 PM
Apparently, the Federal Government introduced the means test on PV because the take up of the technology looked like it was going to exceed their budget before it would have time to replenish the fund in the next budget. Keep in mind that it is the tax payer that produces the money that is used to meet these rebates. Perhaps a far better solution is the Feed In Tariff model such as that being introduced by the ACT Government. To encourage the take up of renewable energy the Federal Government should force all states and territories to legislate support for FITs and itself, develop a system to assist home owners to obtain the finance necessary to install a reasonable grid connected system. The FIT model is a user pays solution where the cost of producing renewable energy is forced onto the utilities. The utilities will eventually have to pass onto their customers the premium they pay for the energy they are delivered through Feed In Suppliers, obviously, they will also be motivated to install their own RE solutions.
Posted by It is time, 30/07/2008 12:52:19 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
GLOBAL WARNING: Entrepreneur Zhengrong Shi, a former University of NSW scientist, heads a Shanghai-based solar empire worth $7.6 billion. Picture: DAVID MARIUZ
GLOBAL WARNING: Entrepreneur Zhengrong Shi, a former University of NSW scientist, heads a Shanghai-based solar empire worth $7.6 billion. Picture: DAVID MARIUZ
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Would you invest in solar technology if it wasn't means tested?

Yes
(71.7%)

No
(28.3%)

Total Votes: 778
Poll Date: 28 July, 2008

Most popular articles

LJ Hooker CIty

Feb Buy Smart
 
Feb Best Buys


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...