News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wilkie turns his back on $1b offer 

Wilkie turns his back on $1b offer

03 Sep, 2010 09:33 AM
Independent MP Andrew Wilkie knocked back a $1 billion incentive to side with the Coalition yesterday, choosing instead to bolster Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s chances of retaining power.

With Mr Wilkie formally backing Labor, Ms Gillard is closer to forming a minority federal government. Opposition Leader Tony Abbott needs the support of all three rural Independents – Bob Katter, Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott – whereas Ms Gillard only needs the backing of two.

The trio will issue their ideas on parliamentary reform today before taking the weekend to decide whether Labor or the Coalition will form government. They will reveal their stance early next week.

Mr Wilkie guessed ‘‘one or two – maybe three’’ of them would now side with Labor.

The Denison MP secured $100 million and possibly more to rebuild the Royal Hobart Hospital, along with a commitment to force the states to introduce a uniform smart card system on poker machines if they wouldn’t volunteer.

He revealed yesterday he had rejected an extraordinarily generous, but bordering on reckless, offer – including $1 billion to build a new hospital in Hobart – from Mr Abbott and decided to side with Ms Gillard. It came a day after Ms Gillard won support from the Greens to form a minority Labor government. In exchange for Mr Wilkie’s backing, she pledged $100 million to build a women’s and children’s hospital in Hobart and to call for a new round of applications for federal funding for major hospital projects.

Mr Wilkie said the Royal Hobart Hospital was in line for up to $340 million from the $1.8 billion Health and Hospitals Fund.

‘‘I think this is an example of where seeking a more modest amount but being more conscious of proper process, and more conscious of equity, so that hospitals around the country can benefit from $1.8 billion, is a much more ethical way to go than simply just grabbing a $1 billion for Tasmania,’’ he said.

Late last night, Coalition finance spokesman Andrew Robb said the $1 billion offer for the Hobart hospital was still on the table for the state.

Mr Wilkie’s agreement included a commitment for more protection for whistleblowers and a pledge to tackle problem gambling by imposing a $250 cap on withdrawals from ATMs in gaming venues excluding casinos, and smart cards to limit bets on poker machines.

For more on this story, including Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s comments on the agreement with Mr Wilkie, see the print edition of today’s Canberra Times.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Wilkies has quite a history with the Conservatives, and it is not a good one. He found it necessary to hold them accountable and gave up his cushy job in an endeavour to do so. since then he has tried to be elected to parliament. Now that he has succeeded, MHR Abbott and cohort reckon he can be bought off. Think again Tones, this guy has a Howard sized chip off his shoulder and has shown every indication that he is the patent opposite of a Sell Out.
Posted by peto, 3/09/2010 9:51:26 AM, on The Canberra Times
In relation to the 1 Billion for the Royal Hobart,I think it was all p!@# and wind,I dont really think Abbott really wants to form government,I for one,would be quite happy to sit back relax and watch the wheels fall off,so you think Labor had a bad out come at this election,wait till next time,it will be a hoot.
Posted by Charity Box, 3/09/2010 9:57:13 AM, on The Canberra Times
I'd rather work with a rattle snake than have anything to do with Andrew Wilkie. What he's trying to do to Tony Abbott will come back and bite him one day. He won't get away with it.
Posted by BT, 3/09/2010 10:00:40 AM, on The Canberra Times
Mr Wilkie, I thank you for your decision. Kind Regards Me
Posted by Jman, 3/09/2010 10:17:44 AM, on The Canberra Times
it was obviose that wilkie was going to support julia gillard from the start ,as he use to be a green candidate and the greens teamed up with labour. it is also obvios that the greens don't have the intrest of the country or their constituants in mind but only to achieve their own agendas at no matter what the cost may be. this fact has been proven by the deal that was struck with labour before the election by bob brown team,and then by the almost instant desition by adam bandt to go with labour, and then followed by the nock back of the one billion dollar offer by the liberals to mr wilikie. for a much less insignifant offer by labour. if the other indipendants are looking for a stable goverment for the next three years i don't think it's going to be labour with the greens telling julia gillar what to do. personally i'd rather see the whole thing go back to the poles. if labour wins we are in for a very rough and costly three years.
Posted by ben j falzon, 3/09/2010 10:38:15 AM, on The Canberra Times
it was obviose that wilkie was going to support julia gillard from the start ,as he use to be a green candidate and the greens teamed up with labour. it is also obvios that the greens don't have the intrest of the country or their constituants in mind but only to achieve their own agendas at no matter what the cost may be. this fact has been proven by the deal that was struck with labour before the election by bob brown team,and then by the almost instant desition by adam bandt to go with labour, and then followed by the nock back of the one billion dollar offer by the liberals to mr wilikie. for a much less insignifant offer by labour. if the other indipendants are looking for a stable goverment for the next three years i don't think it's going to be labour with the greens telling julia gillar what to do. personally i'd rather see the whole thing go back to the poles. if labour wins we are in for a very rough and costly three years.
Posted by ben j falzon, 3/09/2010 10:40:06 AM, on The Canberra Times
it was obviose that wilkie was going to support julia gillard from the start ,as he use to be a green candidate and the greens teamed up with labour. it is also obvios that the greens don't have the intrest of the country or their constituants in mind but only to achieve their own agendas at no matter what the cost may be. this fact has been proven by the deal that was struck with labour before the election by bob brown team,and then by the almost instant desition by adam bandt to go with labour, and then followed by the nock back of the one billion dollar offer by the liberals to mr wilikie. for a much less insignifant offer by labour. if the other indipendants are looking for a stable goverment for the next three years i don't think it's going to be labour with the greens telling julia gillar what to do. personally i'd rather see the whole thing go back to the poles. if labour wins we are in for a very rough and costly three years.
Posted by ben j falzon, 3/09/2010 10:40:30 AM, on The Canberra Times
Latest election news from Down Under: Independent MP seeking stability urges back stabbers to attack one-armed bandits and build new hospital. Not afraid to turn his back on opposition. PM uses past experience to move forward.
Posted by Graham Smith, 3/09/2010 12:24:21 PM, on The Canberra Times
I love how Abbot can just grab a billion bucks and go "here you go now pick me!" Who is he kidding.
Posted by Nads, 3/09/2010 1:18:16 PM, on The Canberra Times
this bloke was labor through and through,if the voters wanted labor back in they would have voted labor, with his ideas this is becoming a very dangerous style of future government, most problem gamblers already bet less that a $1,non problem gamblers have the money to bet at higher stakes
Posted by eggles, 3/09/2010 1:37:32 PM, on The Canberra Times
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tasmanian MP Andrew Wilkie said he wanted a Labor government for all its weaknesses and faults, and urged the other independents to follow him.
Tasmanian MP Andrew Wilkie said he wanted a Labor government "for all its weaknesses and faults", and urged the other independents to follow him.

Most popular articles

Australian Running Festival

CIT - Business ad dec
 
Feb Buy Smart
 
multicumulticultural festivalltural festival


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...