News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 World's forests gasping for air 

World's forests gasping for air

13/01/2009 8:40:00 AM
The capacity of the world's forests to soak up greenhouse gases has dropped by 40 per cent in the past 20 years, according to a new report.

Friends of the Earth International says climate change is severely disrupting forest eco-systems, with ''forests as a whole'' predicted to lose their ability to absorb atmospheric carbon if climate changes forces a 2-degree rise in average temperatures.

It warns the world's forests are being cleared at a rate of 7.3million hectares a year, with loss of tropical forests increasing at a rate of more than 25 per cent.

The organisation, which is the world's biggest environmental network with 6000 member groups, has called for an end to logging of all the world's old growth forests, given their critical role in regulating the Earth's climate.

''The destruction of forests is likely to cause significant changes to weather and climate, both regionally and globally, and thus to ecosystems and food production,'' it says.

The report comes as anti-logging activists in Tasmania clashed with police yesterday over state Government plans to log 169ha of old growth temperate rainforest in the upper Florentine valley in southern Tasmania.

Australian Greens leader Bob Brown said the global report was ''yet another huge warning'' to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd that protecting old growth forests was ''pivotal to any serious plan to stem climate change''.

Senator Brown said despite Federal Government claims that ''land clearing was under control'', it remained a significant contributor to Australia's greenhouse emissions.

He said data showed the volume of forests logged and burned across eastern Australia had increased in recent years.

Meanwhile, the Friends of the Earth Australia spokesman Cam Walker said recently Australia's land clearing rates had only dropped by just 3 per cent in the past 10 years.

''There was an assumption that if Queensland got its clearing rates under control that would solve the issue, but other states have since emerged as major problems mainly Tasmania, Victoria, NSW and the Northern Territory. There are still huge problems with illegal land clearing, '' Mr Walker said.

Before the 2007 election, Labor had promised to introduce national standards and guidelines for land clearing, and to improve compliance and monitoring of clearing, he said.

''But we have seen little movement in this direction from the Rudd Government.''

A spokesman for Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said ''issues associated with land clearing'' would be considered in a number of government reviews of environmental laws and policies, including reviews of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act, the national biodiversity strategy and native vegetation policies.

The executive director of the Australian National University's climate change institute, Professor Will Steffen, said it was critical for Australia ''to retain as many old growth forests as possible''.

''If you map the value of ecosystem services across Australia, you'd find old growth forests were among the most valuable.''

The Friends of the Earth report, ''Forests In A Changing Climate'', warns hotter temperatures are causing widespread forest dieback, with recent studies estimating 55 per cent of the Amazon rainforest could die off within 20 years, releasing up to 26 billion tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere. The US could also lose 11 per cent of its forests.

The report calls for the United Nations to exclude timber plantations such as palm oil from global emissions trading schemes, arguing they are a major driver of global forest loss.

''Replacing old growth forests with plantations is not an option. At best, tree plantations store just 20per cent of the carbon that old-growth forests lock away,'' the report says.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Which report? Who wrote it? What are their qualifications? Who funded it? Was it peer reviewed? By whom? Where can it be viewed? What are the journalist's qualifications? Richard
Posted by Richard Clowes, 13/01/2009 8:28:09 AM
When are these doom and gloom merchants going to be made to stop reporting such garbage. It is fact that the planet has been cooling since 2000 not warming,and if our forests are in such a bad state how come we are finding plant life that has previously been thought extinct for hundreds of years??
Posted by mac, 13/01/2009 8:35:51 AM
Here we go again. If it were not for words like "might, if, possibly and could" the leaders of the new religion "Climate Change" would have absolutely nothing to say!
Posted by GT, 13/01/2009 9:16:39 AM
Sigh...still the climate change deniers (mac) are here commenting. So tiresome. How many times do you have to be told about the faulty scientific logic behind "global cooling" etc etc. Hey, if it makes you happy to deny it and cocoon yourself from the truth, carry on.
Posted by Matt, 13/01/2009 9:34:19 AM
What a lot of hot air, the report is not a scientific peer reviewed one but a briefing paper published last year. It did not focus on australian forests but tropical ones in developing countries and the Boreal foreests of the Northern Hemisphere. It was produced to promote discussion, not to be an authoritive reference. It is riddled with errors, misquoting the World Resources Institute and the IPCC confusing deforestation with forestry. Both the IPCC and WRI have forestry as a neutral source, but list the conversion of forests to other uses at 18% of world GHG. The FOE lump them altogether. The briefing paper also quotes the ANU analysis funded by the Wilderness Society on carbon in forests and plantations. This report, despite being promoted by the green movement in December 2007, is yet to publish its detailed calucualtions, its data or its modelling. Tasmanian forests are extremely well managed, be them the 1 million ha of old growth in reserves, or the 180 ha of the Florentine to be selectively harvested for high grade furniture and craft timber.
Posted by kraft of pristine Valley, 13/01/2009 10:30:31 AM
Here we go again. Every debate about the future of our earth involves possibilities, maybes and speculation by report author/s, each with their own biases. The simple facts are that trees inhale our toxic C02 and exhale life giving O2. Old growth forests are able to do this more effectively for reasons we do not fully understand yet. Why is it so unreasonable to preserve those that give us the very oxygen we breathe? It is possible to generate new industries if man is open to change. Arrogance, stubborness, laziness and overindulgence all need to be overcome by each individual to achieve this, however. Perhaps mainstream bias towards 'tree lovers' fitting a stereotype of long haired 'hippies' also needs to be debunked ?
Posted by JD, 13/01/2009 10:31:56 AM
Why are we still logging old growth forests? I dont understand people when they say that it is ok. Even if it didn't help prevention of climate change (which is does, all forest cosytems are massive carbon sinks) old growth forests contribute a large range of benefits, including water catchment quality, animal habitat and affects the micro-climatic conditons as well as global. Dont forests have a right to exist as members of this planet too? i mean we wouldn't be here without them. Don't just say this is hippy bull**** either that is just ignorance and conforming to a stereotypical approach. it takes hundreds of years to regrow these types of forests, no forest plantation will have to diversity of an old growth. what kind of lifestyle do people want to live in the future? i am a young person, 21 years old, and i, as well as many young people i have met while travelling do not want to live luxurious lifestyles all for what puprose? especially if it is at the expense of the beautiful world we live in. The earth is a sacred place, and if you don't realise this then all you need to do is look up at the sky at night and try and realise how lucky we are just to be alive and breathing in the air which has been produced by trees over millions of years. Think about the big picture instead of getting caught up with ridiculas day to day events which have no meaning. I wager that most people supporting logging of old growth forests such as this one have never been to this amazing forest or others like it in their life.
Posted by zasp, 13/01/2009 11:06:03 AM
Without getting into the great debate of who's got what info about the ifs, butt's & may bee's, I'd like to see the maintaining of jobs, forestry management & the reduction of religious based myths by Bob Brown. The forestry industry is beneficial to all countries & that's why Australia has to be smart in the way we manage it. To be able to plant & restore as fast as we remove adds to the job market but without over extending or knowing the boundaries is just as important. What is it that you really want Bob Brown? I'm sure we would all like to hear.
Posted by Atheistno1, 13/01/2009 12:56:57 PM
I visited the forest in the Upper Florentine recently. What I saw was rainforest (Antarctic beech, Celery Top pine etc) with an overstorey of huge eucalypts being logged and replaced by eucalypt plantations. I left the place with the view that those who destroy this forest should be charged by an international court with crimes against the planet.
Posted by Blue Wren, 13/01/2009 1:07:11 PM
Looks like the forest clearing industry is already geared up to combat this latest evidence of the necessity to stop logging old growth forests, from the tenor of the early postings. Be interested to know which science they are prepared to believe. Will it always be self-serving? In East Gippsland, clearfelling of the last unprotected old growth forests is underway. EG is part of the south-eastern forest that the woodchip mill at Eden has been exporting to Japan since the 1970s. Now most of its chips come from here. Hard to believe, after all the evidence that science and economics have provided, that we are still trashing our catchment protection and climate change insurance and actually subsidising this through rates and taxes. After the bulldozers and chainsaws have gone, climatic and other conditions allowing, biodiverse forests become production forests - a poor relative of the ancient wet forests they replace. Time for governments to show some vision - and concern for the future.
Posted by deb, 13/01/2009 1:10:25 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
MLG_Happy Hour- click here
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Wine and Roses festival - click here
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...