News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Yeti: truth a hair's breadth away 

Yeti: truth a hair's breadth away

28 Jul, 2008 07:59 AM
It is right up there with the Loch Ness monster: the subject of claimed sightings, passionately promoted by believers, dismissed by the scientific community. But now experts say they have found the best evidence to date that the yeti might just conceivably be real.

Tests at Oxford Brookes University on hairs which local people believe came from a yeti in an Indian jungle have failed to link them with any known species and are said to bear ''a startling resemblance'' to those brought back from the Himalayas by Sir Edmund Hillary half a century ago.

Ape expert Ian Redmond, who is co-ordinating the research, said, ''The hairs are the most positive evidence yet that a yeti might possibly exist, because they are tangible. We are very excited about the preliminary results, although more tests need to be done.''

The two short hairs 33mm and 44mm long were picked up in thick forest in the Garo hills in the mountains of north-east India five years ago after a forester reported seeing a yeti locally known as mande barung, or ''forest man'' for three days in a row breaking branches off trees and eating their sap.

The hills are one of several places in the world where similar creatures Bigfoot in the United States, the sasquatch in Canada, the sajarang gigi in Indonesia, and the yeti in Nepal are part of local legend and from where occasional sightings are reported.

After being brought to Britain, the hairs were magnified up to 200 times, and one of them was cast in varnish to make a better two-dimensional image.

They were then compared with hairs from animals known to live in the hills.

''We fully expected them to come from a known animal,'' Mr Redmond said.

The hairs will now be examined under an even more powerful microscope and sent to two different laboratories in Oxford and Cardiff for DNA testing. Follicles containing cells remained on the base of the hairs, Mr Redmond said, ''so there is every chance that we will be able to get even closer to the truth''.

If DNA analysis cannot identify the creature, it should be able to work out what it was related to.

''It could easily be an unknown primate, even if it is not a yeti.''

People in the Garo Hills believe that the yeti exists, and there have been repeated reported sightings of the creatures and their footprints, including by such famous mountaineers as Lord John Hunt, who led the Everest expedition.

In the 1960s and 1970s, during the first Chinese glaciological expeditions in the area of Mt Xixiabangma, Chinese scientists are also said to have found evidence of the yeti's presence at great altitudes, and reportedly had even attempted to catch one.

In 1979, Lord Hunt wrote in The Geographical Magazine, ''My own evidence in support of this unknown primate consists of personal observations of tracks, and hearing a yelp-like call attributed to the yeti by the Sherpa but also similar to the calls made by certain large apes.

''To my mind, the evidence points to the existence in Tibet and during the winter months, in the high valleys of the Nepalese and Indian Himalaya of an ape-like primate ...'' The Independent

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
like I said Twaddle!, & lets add Piffle! If it's anything large it's a Himalayan bear. And I'm a zoologist.
Posted by rzzz, 29/07/2008 9:44:44 AM
I'm amazed at times, by how closed some people's minds can be. The rate at which new species are being discovered is increasing, which definitely shows there is still a lot we don't know about what inhabits this planet. A white ape could easily go undetected in the Himalayas, especially if you consider that most of it is largely inaccessible. There's a good chance that there are other animals we don't know about up there as well. You only have to go to Indonesia, to find new species being found on islands that have been lived on for thousands of years. Think about it.
Posted by NetSurf, 28/07/2008 4:38:26 PM
twaddle!
Posted by rzzz, 28/07/2008 11:24:28 AM
The photo of the footprints seems to indicate that this yeti had only one foot, thus it hopped. I would expect that a two footed yeti would have left it's foot prints wider apart. The only two footed creatures I am aware of walking by placing one foot almost directly in front of the previous, model clothes and strut the catwalks. Thus the yeti only had one foot or the foot prints were made by something else.
Posted by JT4, 28/07/2008 11:01:14 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN: These footprints, attributed to a yeti, were found in 1951 and right, American television channel host Josh Gates displays what is believed to be yeti footprints.
ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN: These footprints, attributed to a yeti, were found in 1951 and right, American television channel host Josh Gates displays what is believed to be yeti footprints.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...