News 
 Local News 
 Sport 
 Swimming 
 D'Arcy dumped from team amid claims he was misled 

D'Arcy dumped from team amid claims he was misled

08 Apr, 2009 08:41 AM
Nick D'Arcy is expected to quit swimming after claims the controversial butterflier was misled for more than a year that he could redeem himself and return to the national team.

D'Arcy was yesterday kicked off the Dolphins world championship team bound for Rome in July after the Swimming Australia board unanimously decided to terminate his contract for breaching a by-law.

In a decision which has shocked members of the swim team and devastated D'Arcy, the 21-year-old has been axed for being convicted of a criminal offence.

It is understood SA sought advice ensuring D'Arcy has no legal right to appeal his expulsion. It is likely to be the final straw for D'Arcy with those within swimming believing SA will not let him swim for Australia again.

SA refused to comment on the decision yesterday or explain why they had originally selected D'Arcy at the national titles and paraded him on a pool deck as a team member knowing he had already pleaded guilty to a charge of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm.

D'Arcy's coach Brian Stehr slammed the decision and believes his star swimmer will now quit.

''It goes above and beyond what most decent people think is reasonable punishment,'' Stehr said.

''I wouldn't be surprised if he wanted to give away the sport now. It's gone too far it is ridiculous.''

D'Arcy was handed a suspended sentence of 14 months and 12 days by a Sydney court for assaulting former swimmer Simon Cowley.

The Australian Olympic Committee expelled him from the 2008 Beijing team last year and in a third and final blow SA has scuppered D'Arcy's bid for redemption in Italy.

Stehr was angry SA had strung his charge along, letting him train then qualify for Rome without telling him that he could be dropped under its by-laws due to his conviction.

''Nick was always going to be convicted because he pleaded guilty,'' Stehr said.

''Why did they allow him to be selected on the team only to take it away from him again it just amazes me.''

The swim team is understood to be shocked at D'Arcy's sudden axing, with one member questioning SA's handling of the situation.

The swimmer agreed D'Arcy had been misled into believing that he could redeem himself if he turned his life around with a commitment to swimming.

''Maybe if he had have known and found this out a year ago he could have not kept on swimming all year and actually moved forward with his life,'' the swimmer said. AAP

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Not only is this beyond reasonable punishment, it is contrary to the rules of natural justice. Let the boy swim, you promised him he could by selecting him.
Posted by astonished, 8/04/2009 10:50:53 AM
He's a bad role model, has a conviction and could be refused entry in other countries, get back to basics!. Just because people are good at sports is not a reason to let them off the hook!.
Posted by colindale, 8/04/2009 12:06:48 PM
It was inappopriate for SA to take any punitive action until the completion of the court action: that would be a denial of natural justice. After that, SA has followed its procedures that Mr D'Arcy would have been aware of. Once again, it appears that people have no sense of responsibility for their actions - if Mr D'Arcy had not smashed a bloke's face with his elbow, then he would not be in this situation.
Posted by stumped, 8/04/2009 12:12:00 PM
What ever happened to rehabilation and compassion, it seems to me we have a bunch of perfect people running SA......hmmmm I doubt it!
Posted by Old Fart, 8/04/2009 1:45:46 PM
Let off the hook...take responsibility! Nick D'Arcy has pleaded guilty to the offence, received a suspended sentence and missed the Olympics. If our criminal justice system can see merit in trying to rehabilitate young offenders why can't swimming? Give the guy a break!
Posted by Newsurfer, 8/04/2009 2:44:33 PM
if he was a drug user he would be back after 2 years! are we all forgetting that he reacted to being slapped in the face...? SA need to give themselves an uppercut!
Posted by whaats, 8/04/2009 2:57:04 PM
"he reacted to being slapped in the face", ONE punch can kill, a slap highly unlikely, get over it!. Are you saying a country should wave a conviction because he is a swimmer?.
Posted by colindale, 8/04/2009 4:27:31 PM
If Mr D'Arcy had shown any contrition or sympathy for his victim AT THE TIME the offence occured, then I may have some sympathy for his predicament. He and his legal team had played the system from the start. Now the system bites back, thats Karma. I don't believe sporting ability is the only quality an individual requires to represent our Country, winning is not everything there is to sport. Don't cheapen the green and gold for the sake of a medal.
Posted by Jim, 8/04/2009 4:51:09 PM
Nick who?
Posted by dirty Joe, 8/04/2009 5:44:12 PM
Why is the Swimming Australia (SA) by-law there in the first place? I don't know the answer but perhaps SA could provide an explanation. What D'Arcy did was wrong and he deserved to be punished but how harshly and for how long and how many times? People who have done far worse have been punished far less! What does Simon Cowley think would be a fair thing?
Posted by Flynn, 8/04/2009 6:01:20 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
DUMPED: Nick D'arcy
DUMPED: Nick D'arcy

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...