News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 $42b stimulus package sunk 

$42b stimulus package sunk

12 Feb, 2009 03:34 PM
The Federal Government's $42 billion economic stimulus package has been sunk in the Senate with independent Nick Xenephon voting against it.

The five Greens senators and Family First's Steve Fielding voted for it but the ballot was tied 35-all in the Senate, meaning the legislation was defeated.

It means low and middle income workers and families will not get the $12 billion in one-off cash bonus payments promised last week by the government and more than $28 billion worth of spending on school repairs and upgrades, building new homes and providing free ceiling insulation will not go ahead unless the government can find one more vote.

The government immediately laid the blame with Malcolm Turnbull and the Opposition for voting against the package.

South Australian independent Senator Nick Xenophon demanded $5 billion be brought forward from future years to buy back water and improve irrrigation infrastructure along the ailing Murray-Darling Basin.

The government offered $410 million, including about $200 million this financial year.

Senator Xenophon said that was not credible and he could not vote for the package.

"I didn't come to Canberra to make friends," he said.

"I came here to make a difference. I will not walk away from the people of the Murray-Darling basin".

As the Bureau of Statistics today said the unemployment rate had risen from 4.5 to 4.8 per cent, Senator Fielding said the package was "flawed" because it would leave 300,000 extra people unemployed.

He wanted to divert $4 billion of the $42 billion to an undefined job creation scheme, but the government rejected that idea.

"The government in its desire to push this package through swiftly, basically has held a gun to the heads of the cross bench.

"We were damned if we voted for it. We were damned if we voted against it," Senator Fielding said.

The Victorian senator said he walked the streets of Canberra for an hour at midnight last night.

"Family First wanted to support a stuimulas package," he said. "But I have reservations about this package".

He said he found himself between two hard places - the government and the Opposition - and a rock - the Australian people that are hanging on in desperate times.

The five Green senators voted with the government after winning several concessions from the government, including reducing the $950 cash bonus payments to $900 with the money saved being used to pay for community job schemes, bicycle paths and heritage projects.

Greens leader Bob Brown said the government had also promised to consider increasing the aged pension in the May budget, give more funding to the Bureau of Statistics and boost funding for a national bushfire research centre in Melbourne.

"We were moving to a wiser, greener, more socially just country because of these ammendments," he said.

The bill is expected to go back to the House of Representatives tonight.

Government Senate leader, Chris Evans, vowed Labor would keep trying to get the Senate to pass the Bill.

Liberal Senator Eric Abetz said the Opposition voted against the package to stop future taxpayers being crippled by the debt incurred by the package, which will plunge the budget into deficit and increase the government's ability to borrow money.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
single page



comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
well now you all need to think about using the 42 billion to remove asbestos in all 2,000 schools in nsw . my children go to a school which has asbestos in there playground i have to worry everyday they are in the grounds of this school no point in moving them to another school as after reading what schools have asbestos every public school has it in the hawkesbury i cant afford a private school as i am a full time carer on a carers payment, i just can not afford the fees and that's sad for the future of this country our children being put last on the list and being put at risk of being exposed to asbestos everyday at school so that means sometime in the future you will need more than 42 billion dollars when us parents take out a class action suit on the education department for failing a duty of care
Posted by lyla, 12/02/2009 4:26:10 PM
Thanks for that. It was the right thing to do. And bicycle paths?? the greens gotta be joking right. Jobs and future debt thats what it should be about
Posted by rob the rednek, 12/02/2009 4:40:14 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

University of Canberra Arts-Design



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...