News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Education revolution failing: expert 

Education revolution failing: expert

02 Nov, 2009 07:47 AM
The Rudd Government's education revolution is all talk and very little action, education commentator Brian Caldwell says.

The professor and former dean of education at the University of Melbourne said Australia risked ending up with one of the most centralised and bureaucratically organised systems of education in the world.

Also, the $16billion spent on Building the Education Revolution would largely be seen as squandered.

A year since he co-wrote the book Why Not the Best Schools?, based on workshops he conducted across more than 4000 schools in 11 countries, Professor Caldwell will deliver a blunt assessment today, rating the Rudd Government a failure in overall educational reform.

''When it comes to changing education, the Rudd Government is faltering. We've been through all the areas they are tackling in education and on 10 key criteria, we can only score it 43 out of 100 at best. A number of education policies can only be described as missing in action,'' he said.

Professor Caldwell gave moves towards a long-overdue national curriculum the top score of eight out of 10, noting Australia was just one of three nations in the Asia-Pacific region that didn't already have one.

On the massive infrastructure boost to schools, Professor Caldwell scored it seven out of 10.

''There is no doubt the Rudd Government deserves praise for the school rebuilding program after years of neglect.

''The problem is the initiative is short term. It's clear from other countries the program needs to be planned over at least a decade.

''The haste is resulting in a focus on multi-purpose halls and libraries for primary schools [but] the top priority should be modernising learning spaces in all schools.'' On the issue of national testing and the threat of league tables, Professor Caldwell warned ''we are definitely heading for disappointment when it comes to the national testing program unless the current strategy is dramatically altered.

''Compulsory national tests have to go. Ministers should honour their promises to release results in a way that won't create invalid and arguably fraudulent league tables of school performance. For this type of behaviour ... the Rudd Government gets a four out of 10.''

And he gave just two out of 10 for the way public schools were treated when it came to autonomy. He said Australian school principals needed the capacity to select their staff and to become more accountable for their results.

He delivered a score of just one out of 10 to the Rudd Government for its lack of imagination in designing ''innovative approaches to governance in our systems of Government schools''.

Noting the rise of publicly funded, no-fee, privately operated charter schools in the United States, Professor Caldwell said Education Minister Julia Gillard was ''backing the wrong horse choosing school report cards over charter schools''.

He said while it was not too late to shift course, ''it ought to trouble the nation that the education revolution whose intent we support is drifting off course''.

Professor Caldwell also praised Tasmania for its innovative approach to providing vocational training courses in a split college system something the ACT is considering adopting.

Professor Caldwell said there were huge benefits in offering students who were not keen on an academic path in life a chance to undertake high quality vocational courses.

''The ACT has always been innovative in the field of education so I hope they follow that through,'' he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The National Curriculum does offer hope that structures may be created to deal more effectively with the common challenges in Australian education. Specifically, we need a structure to encourage and implement innovation. For example, we have a very sad track record in Languages (LOTE) education in Australia. DEST recognized in 2002 that spending any amount of money on "the same model of provision is unlikely to produce better results". And yet we are now spending much, much more money doing just that. "Talking to the Whole Wide World" is a different model of provision, integrating LOTE into the primary curriculum so that it is taught by generalists nearly every day and all children are bilingual in a purpose-built intercultural language before finishing primary, and are therefore equipped to make optimal use of high-school specialists to become trilingual an Asian language. All studies so far have confirmed it's effectiveness, but where is the body to address such an innovation and deliver it to Australian children? This innovation, like many others, was first developed in schools which had the discretion to do so. Australia will be much poorer if that discretion is curtailed.
Posted by Penelope Vos, 3/11/2009 9:18:45 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...